期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Hospital costs fell as numbers of LVADs were increasing: experiences from Oslo University Hospital
Terje P Hagen2  Ishtiaq Khushi3  Gro Sørensen4  Odd Geiran1  Arnt E Fiane1  Vinod Mishra2 
[1]Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
[2]Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
[3]Health Services Research Center Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
[4]Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
关键词: Cost analysis;    DRG reimbursement;    Hospital cost;    Left ventricle assist device;    Innovative technology;   
Others  :  1153033
DOI  :  10.1186/1749-8090-7-76
 received in 2012-04-20, accepted in 2012-08-13,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

The current study was undertaken to examine total hospital costs per patient of a consecutive implantation series of two 3rd generation Left Ventricle Assist Devices (LVAD). Further we analyzed if increased clinical experience would reduce total hospital costs and the gap between costs and the diagnosis related grouped (DRG)-reimbursement.

Method

Cost data of 20 LVAD implantations (VentrAssist™) from 2005-2009 (period 1) were analyzed together with costs from nine patients using another LVAD (HeartWare™) from 2009-June 2011 (period 2). For each patient, total costs were calculated for three phases - the pre-LVAD implantation phase, the LVAD implantation phase and the post LVAD implant phase. Patient specific costs were obtained prospectively from patient records and included personnel resources, medication, blood products, blood chemistry and microbiology, imaging and procedure costs including operating room costs. Overhead costs were registered retrospectively and allocated to the specific patient by predefined allocation keys. Finally, patient specific costs and overhead costs were aggregated into total hospital costs for each patient. All costs were calculated in 2011-prices. We used regression analyses to analyze cost variations over time and between the different devices.

Results

The average total hospital cost per patient for the pre-LVAD, LVAD and post-LVAD for period 1 was $ 585, 513 (range 132, 640- 1 247, 299), and the corresponding DRG- reimbursement (2009) was $ 143, 192 . The mean LOS was 54 days (range 12- 127). For period 2 the total hospital cost per patient was $ 413, 185 (range 314, 540- 622, 664) and the corresponding DRG- reimbursement (2010) was $ 136, 963. The mean LOS was 49 days (range 31- 93).

The estimates from the regression analysis showed that the total hospital costs, excluding device costs, per patient were falling as the number of treated patients increased. The estimate from the trend variable was -14, 096 US$ (CI -3, 842 to -24, 349, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

There were significant reductions in total hospital costs per patient as the numbers of patients were increasing. This can possibly be explained by a learning effect including better logistics, selection and management of patients.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Mishra et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150407023821904.pdf 419KB PDF download
Figure 2. 29KB Image download
Figure 1. 29KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Simon MA, Kormos RL, Gorcsan J 3rd, Dohi K, Winowich S, Stanford E, Carozza L, Murali S: Differential exercise performance on ventricular assist device support. J Heart Lung Transplant 2005, 24(10):1506-1512.
  • [2]Sharples LD, Cafferty F, Demitis N, Freeman C, Dyer M, Banner N, Birks EJ, Khaghani A, Large SR, Tsui S, Caine N, Buxton M: Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of the Ventricular Assist Device Program in the United Kingdom (EVAD UK). J Heart Lung Transplant 2007, 26(1):9-15.
  • [3]Urban M, Pirk J, Dorazilova Z, Netuka I: How does successful bridging with ventricular assist device affect cardiac transplantation outcome? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011, 13(4):405-409.
  • [4]Takayama H, Naka Y, Kodali SK, Vincent JA, Addonizio LJ, Jorde UP, Williams MR: A novel approach to percutaneous right-ventricular mechanical support. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012, 41(2):423-426.
  • [5]Mishra V, Geiran O, Fiane AE, Sørensen G, Andresen S, Olsen EK, Khushi I, Hagen TP: Costs and reimbursement gaps after implementation of third-generation left ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant 2010, 29(1):72-78.
  • [6]Classification of surgical procedures, clinical procedure code system guidelines Trondheim: permission from Nordic Medico-Statistical Committee NOMESCO Classification of Surgical Procedures (NCSP). version 1.14.:2009 http://www.helsedirektoratet.no/vp/multimedia/archive/00269/Ncsp_1_14_269099a.pdf webcite
  • [7]Nordic Centre for Classifications in Health Care- Uppsala Sweden: Nord DRG 2010 NOR Classic (Norway). http://www.norddrg.net/norddrgmanual/NordDRG_2010_NOR/index.htm webcite
  • [8]Activity based financing price list 2010: Oslo Ministry of health and care services. http://www.helsedirektoratet.no/vp/multimedia/archive/00274/Regelverk_innsatsst_274039a.pdf webcite
  • [9]Moskowitz AJ, Rose EA, Gelijns AC: The cost of long-term LVAD implantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2001, 7(3 Suppl):S195-S198. discussion S203-4
  • [10]Slaughter MS, Bostic R, Tong K, Russo M, Rogers JG: Temporal changes in hospital costs for left ventricular assist device implantation. J Card Surg 2011, 26(5):535-541.
  • [11]Miller LW, Nelson KE, Bostic RR, Tong K, Slaughter MS, Long JW: Hospital costs for left ventricular assist devices for destination therapy: lower costs for implantation in the post-REMATCH era. J Heart Lung Transplant 2006, 25(7):778-784.
  • [12]Moerer O, Plock E, Mgbor U, Schmid A, Schneider H, Wischnewsky MB, Burchardi H: A German national prevalence study on the cost of intensive care: an evaluation from 51 intensive care units. Crit Care 2007, 11(3):R69. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [13]McLaughlin AM, Hardt J, Canavan JB, Donnelly MB: Determining the economic cost of ICU treatment: a prospective "micro-costing" study. Intensive Care Med 2009, 35(12):2135-2140.
  • [14]Lietz K, Long JW, Kfoury AG, Slaughter MS, Silver MA, Milano CA, Rogers JG, Miller LW, Deng M, Naka Y, Mancini D: Impact of center volume on outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy: analysis of the Thoratec HeartMate Registry, 1998 to 2005. Circ Heart Fail 2009, 2(1):3-10.
  • [15]Ruel M, Dickie S, Chow BJ, Labinaz M: Interventional valve surgery: building a team and working together. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010, 22(2):145-149. Review
  • [16]Wendler O, Walther T, Schroefel H, Lange R, Treede H, Fusari M, Rubino P, Thomas M: The SOURCE Registry: what is the learning curve in trans-apical aortic valve implantation? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011, 39(6):853-859. discussion 859-60. Epub 2010 Dec 22
  • [17]Lurz P, Coats L, Khambadkone S, Nordmeyer J, Boudjemline Y, Schievano S, Muthurangu V, Lee TY, Parenzan G, Derrick G, Cullen S, Walker F, Tsang V, Deanfield J, Taylor AM, Bonhoeffer P: Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation: impact of evolving technology and learning curve on clinical outcome. Circulation 2008, 117(15):1964-1972.
  • [18]Obremskey WT, Dail T, Jahangir AA: Value-based Purchasing of Medical Devices. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011.
  • [19]Haneya A, Philipp A, Puehler T, Rupprecht L, Kobuch R, Hilker M, Schmid C, Hirt SW: Temporary percutaneous right ventricular support using a centrifugal pump in patients with postoperative acute refractory right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012, 41(1):219-223.
  • [20]Esmore D, Kaye D, Spratt P, et al.: A prospective, multicenter trial of the VentrAssist left ventricular assist device for bridge to transplant: safety and efficacy. J Heart Lung Transplant 2008, 27:579-88.
  • [21]Moreno SG, Novielli N, Cooper NJ: Cost-effectiveness of the implantable HeartMate II left ventricular assist device for patients awaiting heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2012, 31(5):450-8.
  • [22]Sharples LD, Dyer M, Cafferty F, Demiris N, Freeman C, Banner NR, Large SR, Tsui S, Caine N, Buxton M: Cost-effectiveness of ventricular assist device use in the United Kingdom: results from the evaluation of ventricular assist device programme in the UK (EVAD-UK). J Heart Lung Transplant 2006, 25(11):1336-43.
  • [23]Rogers JG, Bostic RR, Tong KB, Adamson R, Russo M, Slaughter MS: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Destination Therapy. Circ Heart Fail 2012, 5(1):10-6.
  • [24]Messori A, Trippoli S, Bonacchi M, Sani G: s Left ventricular assist device as destination therapy: application of the payment-by-results approach for the device reimbursement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009, 138(2):480-5.
  • [25]Activity based financing price list 2012: Oslo Ministry of health and care services. http://www.helsedirektoratet.no/publikasjoner/regelverk-innsatsstyrt-finansiering-2012/Publikasjoner/regelverk-innsatsstyrt-finansiering-2012.pdf webcite
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:34次 浏览次数:29次