Allopolyploidy and the evolution of plant virus resistance

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Marc Fuchs²  Seiya Saito¹  Ramsey Lewis³  John Gottula² 

[1] Kearney Agricultural Research Center, University of California, Parlier, CA 93648, USA;Department of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, NY 14456, USA;Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, 4310 Williams Hall Campus, Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620, USA

关键词: Tomato ringspot virus (ToRSV);    Susceptibility;    Resistance;    Nicotiana;    Nepovirus;    Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV);    Allopolyploidy;   

Others  :  1118214
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2148-14-149

 received in 2014-04-17, accepted in 2014-06-25,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

The relationship between allopolyploidy and plant virus resistance is poorly understood. To determine the relationship of plant evolutionary history and basal virus resistance, a panel of Nicotiana species from diverse geographic regions and ploidy levels was assessed for resistance to non-coevolved viruses from the genus Nepovirus, family Secoviridae. The heritability of resistance was tested in a panel of synthetic allopolyploids. Leaves of different positions on each inoculated plant were tested for virus presence and a subset of plants was re-inoculated and assessed for systemic recovery.

Results

Depending on the host-virus combination, plants displayed immunity, susceptibility or intermediate levels of resistance. Synthetic allopolyploids showed an incompletely dominant resistance phenotype and manifested systemic recovery. Plant ploidy was weakly negatively correlated with virus resistance in Nicotiana species, but this trend did not hold when synthetic allopolyploids were taken into account. Furthermore, a relationship between resistance and geographical origin was observed.

Conclusion

The gradients of resistance and virulence corresponded to a modified matching allele model of resistance. Intermediate resistance responses of allopolyploids corresponded with a model of multi-allelic additive resistance. The variable virus resistance of extant allopolyploids suggested that selection-based mechanisms surpass ploidy with respect to evolution of basal resistance to viruses.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Gottula et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Clay K, Kover PX: The Red Queen hypothesis and plant/pathogen interactions. Annu Rev Phytopathol 1996, 34:29-50.
• [2]Jackson JA, Tinsley RC: Parasite infectivity to hybridising host species: a link between hybrid resistance and allopolyploid speciation? Int J Parasitol 2003, 33:137-144.
• [3]Prentis PJ, Wilson JRU, Dormontt EE, Richardson DM, Lowe AJ: Adaptive evolution in invasive species. Trends Plant Sci 2008, 13:288-294.
• [4]Moulia C: Parasitism of plant and animal hybrids: are facts and fates the same? Ecology 1999, 80:392-406.
• [5]Wolinska J, Lively CM, Spaak P: Parasites in hybridizing communities: the Red Queen again? Trends Parasitol 2008, 24:121-126.
• [6]Otto SP, Whitton J: Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annu Rev Genet 2000, 34:401-427.
• [7]Mette MF, Kanno T, Aufsatz W, Jakowitsch J, van der Winden J, Matzke MA, Matzke AJM: Endogenous viral sequences and their potential contribution to heritable virus resistance in plants. EMBO J 2002, 21:461-469.
• [8]Nawaz-ul-Rehman MS, Fauquet CM: Evolution of geminiviruses and their satellites. FEBS Lett 2009, 583:1825-1832.
• [9]Gibbs AJ, Fargette D, García-Arenal F, Gibbs MJ: Time–the emerging dimension of plant virus studies. J Gen Virol 2010, 91:13-22.
• [10]Lewis RS: Nicotiana. In Wild crop relatives: genomic and breeding resources. Edited by Kole C. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2011:185-208.
• [11]Chase MW: Molecular systematics, GISH and the origin of hybrid taxa in Nicotiana (Solanaceae). Ann Bot 2003, 92:107-127.
• [12]Kovarik A, Matyášek R, Lim KY, Skalická K, Koukalová B, Knapp S, Chase M, Leitch AR: Concerted evolution of 18–5.8-26S rDNA repeats in Nicotiana allotetraploids. Biol J Linn Soc 2004, 82:615-625.
• [13]Clarkson JJ, Kelly LJ, Leitch AR, Knapp S, Chase MW: Nuclear glutamine synthetase evolution in Nicotiana: phylogenetics and the origins of allotetraploid and homoploid (diploid) hybrids. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2010, 55:99-112.
• [14]Kelly LJ, Leitch AR, Clarkson JJ, Knapp S, Chase MW: Reconstructing the complex evolutionary origin of wild allopolyploid tobaccos (Nicotiana section Suaveolentes). Evolution 2013, 67:80-94.
• [15]Patel D, Power JB, Anthony P, Badakshi F, Heslop-Harrison JSP, Davey MR: Somatic hybrid plants of Nicotiana × sanderae (+) N. debneyi with fungal resistance to Peronospora tabacina. Ann Bot 2011, 108:809-819.
• [16]Renny-Byfield S, Chester M, Kovarik A, Le Comber SC, Grandbastien MA, Deloger M, Nichols RA, Macas J, Novak P, Chase MW, Leitch AR: Next generation sequencing reveals genome downsizing in allotetraploid Nicotiana tabacum, predominantly through the elimination of paternally derived repetitive DNAs. Mol Biol Evol 2011, 28:2843-2854.
• [17]Renny-Byfield S, Kovarik A, Chester M, Nichols RA, Macas J, Novák P, Leitch AR: Independent, rapid and targeted loss of highly repetitive DNA in natural and synthetic allopolyploids of Nicotiana tabacum. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e36963.
• [18]Clarkson JJ, Lim KY, Kovarik A, Chase MW, Knapp S, Leitch AR: Long-term genome diploidization in allopolyploid Nicotiana section Repandae (Solanaceae). New Phytol 2005, 168:241-252.
• [19]Dawson WO, Hilf ME: Host-range determinants of plant viruses. Annu Rev Plant Biol 1992, 43:527-555.
• [20]Brunt A, Crabtree K, Dallwitz M, Gibbs AJ, Watson L, Zurcher E: Plant viruses online: descriptions and lists from the VIDE database. [http://pvo.bio-mirror.cn/refs.htm webcite]
• [21]Christie SR, Crawford WE: Plant virus range of Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Disease Reporter 1978, 62:20-22.
• [22]Dijk P, Meer FA, Piron PGM: Accessions of Australian Nicotiana species suitable as indicator hosts in the diagnosis of plant virus diseases. Eur J Plant Pathol 1987, 93:73-85.
• [23]Dijk P, Cuperus C: Reactions on Nicotiana species to potato viruses A, X and Y and tobacco mosaic virus in relation to their taxonomy and geographical origin. Eur J Plant Pathol 1989, 95:343-356.
• [24]Goodin MM, Zaitlin D, Naidu RA, Lommel SA: Nicotiana benthamiana: its history and future as a model for plant–pathogen interactions. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 2008, 21:1015-1026.
• [25]Yang S, Carter S, Cole A, Cheng NH, Nelson RS: A natural variant of a host RNA-dependent RNA polymerase is associated with increased susceptibility to viruses by Nicotiana benthamiana. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2004, 101:6297-6302.
• [26]Holmes FO: Inheritance of resistance to tobacco-mosaic disease in tobacco. Phytopathology 1938, 28:553-561.
• [27]Cole AB, Király L, Ross K, Schoelz JE: Uncoupling resistance from cell death in the hypersensitive response of Nicotiana species to Cauliflower mosaic virus infection. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 2001, 14:31-41.
• [28]Taliansky M, Aranda MA, García-Arenal F: Differential invasion by tobamoviruses of Nicotiana megalosiphon following the hypersensitive response. Phytopathology 1994, 84:812-815.
• [29]Fraser R: The genetics of plant-virus interactions: implications for plant breeding. Euphytica 1992, 63:175-185.
• [30]Maule AJ, Caranta C, Boulton MI: Sources of natural resistance to plant viruses: status and prospects. Mol Plant Pathol 2007, 8:223-231.
• [31]Pehu E, Gibson RW, Jones M, Karp A: Studies on the genetic basis of resistance to Potato leaf roll virus, Potato virus Y and Potato virus X in Solanum brevidens using somatic hybrids of Solanum brevidens and Solanum tuberosum. Plant Sci 1990, 69:95-101.
• [32]Lewis RS: Transfer of resistance to potato virus Y (PVY) from Nicotiana africana to Nicotiana tabacum: possible influence of tissue culture on the rate of introgression. Theor Appl Genet 2005, 110:678-687.
• [33]Sanfaçon H, Wellink J, Gall O, Karasev A, Vlugt R, Wetzel T: Secoviridae: a proposed family of plant viruses within the order Picornavirales that combines the families Sequiviridae and Comoviridae, the unassigned genera Cheravirus and Sadwavirus, and the proposed genus Torradovirus. Arch Virol 2009, 154:899-907.
• [34]Andret-Link P, Laporte C, Valat L, Ritzenthaler C, Demangeat G, Vigne E, Laval V, Pfeiffer P, Stussi-Garaud C, Fuchs M: Grapevine fanleaf virus: still a major threat to the grapevine industry. J Plant Pathol 2004, 86:183-195.
• [35]Sanfaçon H, Fuchs M: Tomato ringspot virus. In Virus and virus-like diseases of pome and stone fruits. Edited by Hadidi A, Barba M, Candresse T, Jelkmann W. St. Paul, MN: APS Press; 2011:41-48.
• [36]Raski DJ, Goheen AC, Lider LA, Meredith CP: Strategies against Grapevine fanleaf virus and its nematode vector. Plant Dis 1983, 67:335-339.
• [37]Lamberti F, Golden AM: Redescription of Xiphinema americanum Cobb, 1913 with comments on its morphometric variations. J Nematol 1984, 16:204-206.
• [38]Dias HF, Harrison BD: The relationship between Grapevine fanleaf, Grapevine yellow mosaic and Arabis mosaic viruses. Ann Appl Biol 1963, 51:97-105.
• [39]Jovel J, Walker M, Sanfaçon H: Salicylic acid-dependent restriction of Tomato ringspot virus spread in tobacco is accompanied by a hypersensitive response, local RNA silencing, and moderate systemic resistance. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 2011, 24:706-718.
• [40]Ratcliff F, Harrison BD, Baulcombe DC: A similarity between viral defense and gene silencing in plants. Science 1997, 276:1558-1560.
• [41]Siddiqui SA, Sarmiento C, Kiisma M, Koivumaki S, Lemmetty A, Truve E, Lehto K: Effects of viral silencing suppressors on Tobacco ringspot virus infection in two Nicotiana species. J Gen Virol 2008, 89:1502-1508.
• [42]Schwach F, Vaistij FE, Jones L, Baulcombe DC: An RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase prevents meristem invasion by Potato virus X and is required for the activity but not the production of a systemic silencing signal. Plant Physiol 2005, 138:1842-1852.
• [43]Qu F, Ye X, Hou G, Sato S, Clemente TE, Morris TJ: RDR6 has a broad-spectrum but temperature-dependent antiviral defense role in Nicotiana benthamiana. J Virol 2005, 79:15209-15217.
• [44]Ying X, Dong L, Zhu H, Duan C, Du QS, Lv DQ, Fang Y, García JA, Fang R-X, Guo HS: RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase 1 from Nicotiana tabacum suppresses RNA silencing and enhances viral infection in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Cell 2010, 22:1358-1372.
• [45]Oliver J, Fuchs M: Tolerance and resistance to viruses and their vectors in Vitis sp.: a virologist's perspective of the literature. Am J Enol Vitic 2011, 62:438-451.
• [46]Gottula JW, Lapato D, Cantilina KK, Saito S, Bartlett B, Fuchs M: Genetic variability, evolution and biological effects of Grapevine fanleaf virus satellite RNAs. Phytopathology 2013, 103:1180-1187.
• [47]Vigne E, Gottula J, Schmitt-Keichinger C, Komar V, Ackerer L, Belval L, Rakotomalala L, Lemaire O, Ritzenthaler C, Fuchs M: A strain-specific segment of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of Grapevine fanleaf virus determines symptoms in Nicotiana species. J Gen Virol 2013, 94:2803-2813.
• [48]Jovel J, Walker M, Sanfaçon H: Recovery of Nicotiana benthamiana plants from a necrotic response induced by a nepovirus is associated with RNA silencing but not with reduced virus titer. J Virol 2007, 81:12285-12297.
• [49]Pagán I, Alonso-Blanco C, García-Arenal F: The relationship of within-host multiplication and virulence in a plant-virus system. PLoS ONE 2007, 2:e786-e786.
• [50]Ross AF: Localized acquired resistance to plant virus infection in hypersensitive hosts. Virology 1961, 14:329-339.
• [51]Schulze-Lefert P, Panstruga R: A molecular evolutionary concept connecting nonhost resistance, pathogen host range, and pathogen speciation. Trends Plant Sci 2011, 16:1360-1386.
• [52]Gunduz I, Buss GR, Chen P, Tolin SA: Genetic and phenotypic analysis of Soybean mosaic virus resistance in PI 88788 soybean. Phytopathology 2004, 94:687-692.
• [53]Bruening G: Resistance to infection. In Natural resistance mechanisms of plants to viruses. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2006:211-240.
• [54]Lambrechts L, Fellous S, Koella JC: Coevolutionary interactions between host and parasite genotypes. Trends Parasitol 2006, 22:12-16.
• [55]Fraile A, García-Arenal F: The coevolution of plants and viruses. In Advances in virus research Volume 76. Edited by Maramorosch K, Shatkon A, Murphy F. San Diego, CA: Elsevier; 2010:1-32.
• [56]Fritz RS: Resistance of hybrid plants to herbivores: genes, environment, or both? Ecology 1999, 80:382-391.
• [57]Chen ZJ: Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms for gene expression and phenotypic variation in plant polyploids. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2007, 58:377.
• [58]Rapp RA, Udall JA, Wendel JF: Genomic expression dominance in allopolyploids. BMC Biol 2009, 7:18.
• [59]Scascitelli M, Cognet M, Adams KL: An interspecific plant hybrid shows novel changes in parental splice forms of genes for splicing factors. Genetics 2010, 184:975-983.
• [60]Carr JP, Lewsey MG, Palukaitis P: Signaling in induced resistance. In Advances in virus research Volume 76. Edited by Maramorosch K, Shatkon A, Murphy F. San Diego, CA: Elsevier; 2010:57-121.
• [61]Boatwright JL, Pajerowska-Mukhtar K: Salicylic acid: an old hormone up to new tricks. Mol Plant Pathol 2013, 14:623-634.
• [62]Incarbone M, Dunoyer P: RNA silencing and its suppression: novel insights from in planta analyses. Trends Plant Sci 2013, 18:382-392.
• [63]King KC, Seppälä O, Neiman M: Is more better? Polyploidy and parasite resistance. Biol Lett 2012, 8:598-600.
• [64]Jackson S, Chen ZJ: Genomic and expression plasticity of polyploidy. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2010, 13:153-159.
• [65]Feldman M, Levy AA, Fahima T, Korol A: Genomic asymmetry in allopolyploid plants: wheat as a model. J Exp Bot 2012, 63:5045-5059.
• [66]Soltis PS: Hybridization, speciation and novelty. J Evol Biol 2013, 26:291-293.
• [67]Lou Y, Baldwin IT: Manduca sexta recognition and resistance among allopolyploid Nicotiana host plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2003, 100:14581-14586.
• [68]Vallad GE, Goodman RM: Systemic acquired resistance and induced systemic resistance in conventional agriculture. Crop Sci 2004, 44:1920-1934.
• [69]Palloix A, Ayme V, Moury B: Durability of plant major resistance genes to pathogens depends on the genetic background, experimental evidence and consequences for breeding strategies. New Phytol 2009, 183:190-199.
• [70]Floate KD, Whitham TG: The hybrid bridge hypothesis: host shifting via plant hybrid swarms. Am Nat 1993, 141:651-662.
• [71]DeVerna JW, Myers JR, Collins GB: Bypassing prefertilization barriers to hybridization insing in vitro pollination and fertilization. Theor Appl Genet 1987, 73:665-671.
• [72]Ritzenthaler C, Viry M, Pinck M, Margis R, Fuchs M, Pinck L: Complete nucleotide sequence and genetic organization of Grapevine fanleaf nepovirus RNA1. J Gen Virol 1991, 72:2357-2365.
• [73]Serghini MA, Fuchs M, Pinck M, Reinbolt J, Walter B, Pinck L: RNA2 of Grapevine fanleaf virus: sequence analysis and coat protein cistron location. J Gen Virol 1990, 71:1433-1441.
• [74]Huss B, Walter B, Fuchs M: Cross-protection between Arabis mosaic virus and Grapevine fanleaf virus isolates in Chenopodium quinoa. Ann Appl Biol 1989, 114:45-60.
• [75]Bitterlin MW, Gonsalves D: Serological grouping of Tomato ringspot virus isolates: implications for diagnosis and cross-protection. Phytopathology 1998, 78:278-285.
• [76]Gottula JW, Lewis R, Saito S, Fuchs M: Virus incidence data from: Allopolyploidy and the evolution of plant virus resistance. BMC Evol Biol 2014. Dryad Digital Repository. http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.3543v webcite