In silico vs in vitro analysis of primer specificity for the detection of Gardnerella vaginalis, Atopobium vaginae and Lactobacillus spp.

BMC Research Notes

Nuno Cerca¹  António Machado¹  Tatiana Cereija¹  Ana Henriques¹ 

[1] CEB-IBB, Centro de Engenharia Biológica - Instituto de Biotecnologia e Bioengenharia, Universidade do Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal

关键词: Lactobacillus spp.;    A. vaginae;    G. vaginalis;    In vitro primer testing;    In silico primer testing;    Primer sensitivity;    Primer specificity;   

Others  :  1165210
DOI  :  10.1186/1756-0500-5-637

 received in 2012-09-04, accepted in 2012-11-14,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common pathology of women in reproductive age that can lead to serious health complications, and is associated with shifts in the normal microflora from predominance of Lactobacillus spp. to a proliferation of other anaerobes such as G. vaginalis and A vaginae, which can be detected by PCR. The optimal PCR pathogen detection assay relies mainly on the specificity and sensitivity of the primers used.

Findings

Here we demonstrate that in silico analytical testing of primer specificity is not a synonym to in vitro analytical specificity by testing a range of published and newly designed primers with both techniques for the detection of BV-associated microorganisms.

Conclusions

By testing primer in vitro specificity with a sufficient range of bacterial strains, we were able to design primers with higher specificity and sensitivity. Also by comparing the results obtained for the newly designed primers with other previously published primers, we confirmed that in silico analysis is not sufficient to predict in vitro specificity. As such care must be taken when choosing the primers for a detection assay.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Henriques et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Schmid GP: The epidemiology of bacterial vaginosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999, 67(Suppl 1):S17-S20.
• [2]Pirotta M, Fethers KA, Bradshaw CS: Bacterial vaginosis - more questions than answers. Aust Fam Physician 2009, 38:394-397.
• [3]Joesoeff MR, Schimd GP, Hillier SL: Bacterial vaginosis: review of treatment options and potential clinical indications for therapy. Clin Infect Dis 1999, 28:S57-S65.
• [4]Mastromarino P, Macchia S, Meggiorini L, Trinchieri V, Mosca L, Perluigi M, et al.: Effectiveness of Lactobacillus-containing vaginal tablets in the treatment of symptomatic bacterial vaginosis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2009, 15:67-74.
• [5]Cos P, Tote K, Horemans T, Maes L: Biofilms: an extra hurdle for effective antimicrobial therapy. Curr Pharm Des 2010, 16:2279-2295.
• [6]Swidsinski A, Mendling W, Loening-Baucke V, Ladhoff A, Swidsinski S, Hale LP, et al.: Adherent biofilms in bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol 2005, 106:1013-1023.
• [7]Srinivasan S, Fredricks DN: The human vaginal bacterial biota and bacterial vaginosis. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis 2008, 200(8):750479.
• [8]Huws SA, Edwards JE, Kim EJ, Scollan ND: Specificity and sensitivity of eubacterial primers utilized for molecular profiling of bacteria within complex microbial ecosystems. J Microbiol Methods 2007, 70:565-569.
• [9]Morales SE, Holben WE: Empirical testing of 16S rRNA gene PCR primer pairs reveals variance in target specificity and efficacy not suggested by in silico analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75:2677-2683.
• [10]Pepin J, Deslandes S, Giroux G, Sobela F, Khonde N, Diakite S, et al.: The complex vaginal flora of West African women with bacterial vaginosis. PLoS One 2011, 6:e25082.
• [11]De Backer E, Verhelst R, Verstraelen H, Alqumber MA, Burton JP, Tagg JR, et al.: Quantitative determination by real-time PCR of four vaginal Lactobacillus species, Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae indicates an inverse relationship between L. gasseri and L. iners. BMC Microbiol 2007, 7:115. BioMed Central Full Text
• [12]Ferris MJ, Masztal A, Martin DH: Use of species-directed 16S rRNA gene PCR primers for detection of Atopobium vaginae in patients with bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol 2004, 42:5892-5894.
• [13]McKechnie ML, Hillman R, Couldwell D, Kong F, Freedman E, Wang H, et al.: Simultaneous identification of 14 genital microorganisms in urine by use of a multiplex PCR-based reverse line blot assay. J Clin Microbiol 2009, 47:1871-1877.
• [14]Menard JP, Fenollar F, Henry M, Bretelle F, Raoult D: Molecular quantification of Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae loads to predict bacterial vaginosis. Clin Infect Dis 2008, 47:33-43.
• [15]Zariffard MR, Saifuddin M, Sha BE, Spear GT: Detection of bacterial vaginosis-related organisms by real-time PCR for Lactobacilli, Gardnerella vaginalis and Mycoplasma hominis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2002, 34:277-281.
• [16]Byun R, Nadkarni MA, Chhour KL, Martin FE, Jacques NA, Hunter N: Quantitative analysis of diverse Lactobacillus species present in advanced dental caries. J Clin Microbiol 2004, 42:3128-3136.
• [17]Rekha R, Rizvi MA, Jaishree P: Designing and validation of genus-specific primers for human gut flora study. Electron J Biotechnol 2006, 9:505-5211.