Virtual patients: the influence of case design and teamwork on students’ perception and knowledge – a pilot study

BMC Medical Education

Sigrid Harendza¹  Susanne Sehner²  Martin Abendroth¹  Martin Riemer³  Frederik Jäger¹ 

[1]Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany

[2]Institute for Biometrics and Epidemiology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany

[3]Department of Computational Neuroscience, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany

关键词: Virtual patients;    Teamwork;    E-learning;    CASUS;   

Others  :  1118059
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6920-14-137

 received in 2013-12-29, accepted in 2014-06-30,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Virtual patient (VP) cases are an effective teaching method, although little is known about how to design and implement them for maximum effectiveness. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of case design and teamwork on students’ learning outcome.

Methods

One hundred forty-six undergraduate medical students participated in a mandatory medical computer science course consisting of five seminars. At the end of each seminar, they worked on one VP case, either in teams of two or individually. Each student filled out an introductory and a final survey and a feedback sheet after completing each case. Additionally, there was a surprise multiple choice (MC) test after the last seminar with three questions regarding each case.

Results

Students with more clinical experience and students who had worked in a team performed significantly better on MC questions. Students with less clinical experience more frequently used information which had been positioned less prominently on the case material. Certain aspects of case design were rated more positively by students who had an interest in e-learning. In general, students preferred to work on cases for less than 15 minutes.

Conclusions

Clinically more advanced students and students working with a partner seem to benefit most from short VP cases with prominently presented information.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Jäger et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Ellaway R, Masters K: AMEE guide 32: e-Learning in medical education part 1: learning, teaching and assessment. Med Teach 2008, 30:474-489.
• [2]Triola MM, Huwendiek S, Levinson AJ, Cook DA: New directions in e-learning research in health professions education: report of two symposia. Med Teach 2012, 34:e15-e20.
• [3]Davis J, Crabb S, Rogers E, Zamora J, Khan K: Computer-based teaching is as good as face to face lecture-based teaching of evidence based medicine: a randomized controlled trial. Med Teach 2008, 30:302-307.
• [4]Cook DA, Triola MM: Virtual patients: a critical literature review and proposed next steps. Med Educ 2009, 43:303-311.
• [5]Cook DA, Erwin PJ, Triola MM: Computerized virtual patients in health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med 2010, 85:1589-1602.
• [6]Huwendiek S, de Leng BA, Zary N, Fischer MR, Ruiz JG, Ellaway R: Towards a typology of virtual patients. Med Teach 2009, 31:743-748.
• [7]Kolb S, Reichert J, Hege I, Praml G, Bellido MC, Martinez-Jaretta B, Fischer M, Nowak D, Radon K, NetWoRM group: European dissemination of a web- and case-based learning system for occupational medicine: NetWoRM Europe. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2007, 80:553-557.
• [8]Woelber JP, Hilbert TS, Ratka-Krüger P: Can easy-to-use software deliver effective e-learning in dental education? a randomised controlled study. Eur J Dent Educ 2012, 16:187-192.
• [9]Hege I, Ropp V, Adler M, Radon K, Mäsch G, Lyon H, Fischer MR: Experiences with different integration strategies of case-based e-learning. Med Teach 2007, 29:791-797.
• [10]Berman N, Fall LH, Smith S, Levine DA, Maloney CG, Potts M, Siegel B, Foster-Johnson L: Integration strategies for using virtual patients in clinical clerkships. Acad Med 2009, 84(7):942-949.
• [11]Edelbring S1, Broström O, Henriksson P, Vassiliou D, Spaak J, Dahlgren LO, Fors U, Zary N: Integrating virtual patients into courses: follow-up seminars and perceived benefit. Med Educ 2012, 46(4):417-425. Edelbring 1
• [12]Huwendiek S, Reichert F, Bosse HM, de Leng BA, van der Vleuten CPM, Haag M, Hoffmann GF, Tönshoff B: Design principles for virtual patients: a focus group study among students. Med Educ 2009, 43:580-588.
• [13]Kühne-Eversmann L, Eversmann T, Fischer MR: Team- and case-based learning to activate participants and enhance knowledge: an evaluation of seminars in Germany. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008, 28:165-171.
• [14]Edelbring S, Dastmalchi M, Hult H, Lundberg IE, Dahlgren LO: Experiencing virtual patients in clinical learning: a phenomenological study. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2011, 16(3):331-345. Edelbring 2
• [15]Kusurkar RA, Ten Cate TJ, van Asperen M, Croiset G: Motivation as an independent and a dependent variable in medical education: a review of the literature. Med Teach 2011, 33:e242-e262.
• [16]Riemer M, Abendroth M: Virtual patients: which kind of teaching method is most attractive to medical students? GMS Med Inform Biom Epidemiol 2013, 9:Docx1. Article in German
• [17]Fischer MR, Schauer S, Gräsel C, Baehring T, Mandl H, Gärtner R, Schwerbaum W, Scriba PC: CASUS model trail. a computer-assisted author system for problem-oriented learning in medicine. Z Arztl Fortbild 1996, 90:385-389. Article in German
• [18]Svirko E, Mellanby J: Attitudes to e-learning, learning style and achievement in learning neuroanatomy by medical students. Med Teach 2008, 30:e219-e227.
• [19]Bateman J, Allen M, Samani D, Kidd J, Davies D: Virtual patient design: exploring what works and why. a grounded theory study. Med Educ 2013, 47:595-606.
• [20]Kim S, Phillips WR, Pinsky L, Brock D, Phillips K, Keary J: A conceptual framework for developing teaching cases: a review and synthesis of the literature across disciplines. Med Educ 2006, 40:867-876.
• [21]Cook DA, Dupras DM: A practical guide to developing effective web-based learning. J Gen Int Med 2004, 19:698-707.
• [22]Moreno R, Mayer R: Learning science in virtual reality multimedia environments: role of methods and media. J Educ Psychol 2002, 94:598-610.
• [23]Mahnken AH, Baumann M, Meister M, Schmitt V, Fischer MR: Blended learning in radiology: is elf-determined learning really more effective? Eur J Radiol 2011, 78:384-387.
• [24]Abendroth M, Harendza S, Riemer M: Clinical decision making: a pilot e-learning study. Clin Teach 2013, 10:51-55.