Efficacy of an internet-based tool for improving physician knowledge of chronic kidney disease: an observational study

BMC Nephrology

Michael J Choi²  Jennifer Roth²  Stephen D Sisson¹  Michelle M Estrella² 

[1] Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N. Caroline Street, Room 7150 G, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA;Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1830 E. Monument Street, Suite 416, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA

关键词: Primary care;    Internet;    Education;    Kidney disease;   

Others  :  1083085
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2369-13-126

 received in 2012-06-07, accepted in 2012-09-22,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Early recognition and management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) are associated with better outcomes. Internal medicine residency should prepare physicians to diagnose and manage CKD.

Methods

To examine whether residency training and program characteristics were associated with CKD knowledge and investigate the effectiveness of an internet-based training module in improving CKD knowledge, we analyzed data from CKD training modules administered annually to U.S. internal medicine residents from July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2009. Baseline CKD knowledge was assessed using pre-tests. The modules’ effectiveness was evaluated by post-tests. Comparisons were performed using X² tests and paired t-tests.

Results

Of 4,702 residents, 38%, 33%, and 29% were program year (PGY)-1, PGY-2, and PGY-3, respectively. Baseline CKD knowledge was poor, with mean pre-test scores of 45.1-57.0% across the four years. The lowest pre-test performance was on CKD recognition. Pre-test scores were better with higher training levels (P-trend < 0.001 except 2005–2006 [P-trend = 0.35]). Affiliation with a renal fellowship program or program location within a region of high end-stage kidney disease prevalence was not associated with better baseline CKD knowledge. Completion of the CKD module led to significant improvements from pre- to post-test scores (mean improvement 27.8% [SD: 21.3%] which were consistent from 2005 to 2009.

Conclusions

Knowledge of diagnosis and management of CKD improves during residency training but remains poor among graduating residents. Web-based training can be effective in educating physicians on CKD-related issues. Studies are needed to determine whether knowledge gained from such an intervention translates to improved care of CKD patients.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Estrella et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Coresh J, Selvin E, Stevens LA, Manzi J, Kusek JW, Eggers P, et al.: Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA 2007, 298:2038-2047.
• [2]U.S. Renal Data System, USRDS 2011 Annual Data Report. MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda; 2010. [Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States]
• [3]McClellan WM, Wasse H, McClellan AC, Kipp A, Waller LA, Rocco MV: Treatment center and geographic variability in pre-ESRD care associate with increased mortality. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009, 20:1078-1085.
• [4]Rosenberg ME: Adult nephrology fellowship training in the United States: trends and issues. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007, 18:1027-1033.
• [5]Israni RK, Shea JA, Joffe MM, Feldman HI: Physician characteristics and knowledge of CKD management. Am J Kidney Dis 2009, 54:238-247.
• [6]Charles RF, Powe NR, Jaar BG, Troll MU, Parekh RS, Boulware LE: Clinical testing patterns and cost implications of variation in the evaluation of CKD among US physicians. Am J Kidney Dis 2009, 54:227-237.
• [7]Agrawal V, Ghosh AK, Barnes MA, McCullough PA: Awareness and knowledge of clinical practice guidelines for CKD among internal medicine residents: a national online survey. Am J Kidney Dis 2008, 52:1061-1069.
• [8]Sisson SD, Hughes MT, Levine D, Brancati FL: Effect of an Internet-based curriculum on postgraduate education. A multicenter intervention. J Gen Intern Med 2004, 19:505-509.
• [9]Kern DE, Thomas PA, Hughes MT: Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. 2nd edition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2009.
• [10]Case SM, Swanson DB: Constructing written test questions for the basic and clinical sciences. 3rd edition. Philadelphia: National Board of Medical Examiners; 2002.
• [11]Matsushita K, van der Velde M, Astor BC, Woodward M, Levey AS, de Jong PE, et al.: Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis. Lancet 2010, 375:2073-2081.
• [12]Reed DA, Fletcher KE, Arora VM: Systematic review: association of shift length, protected sleep time, and night float with patient care, residents' health, and education. Ann Intern Med 2010, 153:829-842.
• [13]Deano RC, Dekosky A, Appannagari A, Doll J, Georgitis E, Potts S, et al.: Resident time spent in clinical and educational activities at home: implications for duty hours. Arch Intern Med 2011, 171:1038-1039.
• [14]Walsh K, Rafiq I, Hall R: Online educational tools developed by Heart improve the knowledge and skills of hospital doctors in cardiology. Postgrad Med J 2007, 83:502-503.
• [15]Walsh K: Online educational tools to improve the knowledge of primary care professionals in infectious diseases. Educ Health (Abingdon) 2008, 21:64.
• [16]Casebeer L, Brown J, Roepke N, Grimes C, Henson B, Palmore R, et al.: Evidence-based choices of physicians: a comparative analysis of physicians participating in Internet CME and non-participants. BMC Med Educ 2010, 10:42. BioMed Central Full Text
• [17]Fordis M, King JE, Ballantyne CM, Jones PH, Schneider KH, Spann SJ, et al.: Comparison of the instructional efficacy of Internet-based CME with live interactive CME workshops: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005, 294:1043-1051.
• [18]Sangvai S, Mahan JD, Lewis KO, Pudlo N, Suresh S, McKenzie LB: The impact of an interactive Web-based module on residents' knowledge and clinical practice of injury prevention. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2012, 51:165-174.
• [19]Westmoreland GR, Counsell SR, Tu W, Wu J, Litzelman DK: Web-based training in geriatrics for medical residents: a randomized controlled trial using standardized patients to assess outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010, 58:1163-1169.
• [20]Dalal D, Brancati FL, Sisson SD: Factors affecting learner satisfaction with an internet-based curriculum. South Med J 2012, 105:387-391.
• [21]Horton WK: Designing web-based training: how to teach anyone anything anwhere anytime. New York; 2000.
• [22]Barnes BE: Creating the practice-learning environment: using information technology to support a new model of continuing medical education. Acad Med 1998, 73:278-281.