Under the (legal) radar screen: global health initiatives and international human rights obligations

BMC International Health and Human Rights

Wouter Vandenhole²  Gorik Ooms¹  Rachel Hammonds¹ 

[1]Institute of Tropical Medicine, 155 Nationalestraat, 2000, Antwerp, Belgium

[2]Faculty of Law, University of Antwerp, Stadscampus, S.V.132 Venusstraat 23, 2000, Antwerp, Belgium

关键词: Extraterritorial legal obligations;    Transnational legal process;    Right to health;    HIV;    Tuberculosis and Malaria;    The Global Fund to fight AIDS;    Human rights;    Global health initiatives;   

Others  :  855459
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-698X-12-31

 received in 2012-03-26, accepted in 2012-10-26,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Given that many low income countries are heavily reliant on external assistance to fund their health sectors the acceptance of obligations of international assistance and cooperation with regard to the right to health (global health obligations) is insufficiently understood and studied by international health and human rights scholars. Over the past decade Global Health Initiatives, like the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (Global Fund) have adopted novel approaches to engaging with stakeholders in high and low income countries. This article explores how this experience impacted on acceptance of the international obligation to (help) fulfil the right to health beyond borders.

Methods

The authors conducted an extensive review of international human rights law literature, transnational legal process literature, global public health literature and grey literature pertaining to Global Health Initiatives. To complement this desk work and deepen their understanding of how and why different legal norms evolve the authors conducted 19 in-depth key informant interviews with actors engaged with three stakeholders; the European Union, the United States and Belgium. The authors then analysed the interviews through a transnational legal process lens.

Results

Through according value to the process of examining how and why different legal norms evolve transnational legal process offers us a tool for engaging with the dynamism of developments in global health suggesting that operationalising global health obligations could advance the right to health for all.

Conclusions

In many low-income countries the health sector is heavily dependent on external assistance to fulfil the right to health of people thus it is vital that policies and tools for delivering reliable, long-term assistance are developed so that the right to health for all becomes more than a dream. Our research suggests that the Global Fund experience offers lessons to build on.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Hammonds et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Schachter O: International Law in Theory and Practice. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991:3.
• [2]Gostin LO: The unconscionable health gap: a global plan for justice. Lancet 2010, 375:1504-1505.
• [3]International covenant on economic, social and cultural rights. New York: United Nations General Assembly; G.A. Res. 21/2200A, 993 U.N.T.S. 3, UN Doc A/6316 1966. Please see article 2.1
• [4]Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: General Comment No. 14, The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health. 2000. UN Doc. No. E/C.12/2000/4. http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/%28symbol%29/E.C.12.2000.4.En webcite
• [5]Meier BM: Global Health Takes a Normative Turn: The Expanding Purview of International Health Law and Global Health Policy to Meet the Public Health Challenge of the 21st Century, Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence. 2011. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1974145 webcite
• [6]Howse R, Teitel R: Beyond compliance: rethinking Why International law really matters. Global Pol 2010, 1(2):128. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.111/j.1758-5899.2010.00035.x/pdf webcite
• [7]Koh HH: Why do nations obey international law? Yale Law J 1997, 106:2599.
• [8]Koh HH: How is international human rights law enforced? Indiana Law J 1999, 74:1397.
• [9]Coomans F, Gunfeld F, Kamminga M (Eds): Methods of Human Rights Research. Antwerp: Intersentia; 2009.
• [10]UN Human Rights Council: Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, Paul Hunt Addendum, Mission to Sweden. A/HRC/4/28/Add.2, 2007. para 133 http://www.vardforalla.se/files/vardforalla/paul_hunt_mission_to_sweden.pdf webcite
• [11]Berman P: A pluralist approach to international law. Yale J Int Law 2007, 32:301-304.
• [12]Salomon M, Tostensen A, Vandenhole W (Eds): Casting the Net Wider: Human Rights, Development and New Duty Bearers. Antwerp: Intersentia; 2007.
• [13]Clapham A: Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
• [14]Skogly S: Beyond National Borders: States’ Human Rights Obligations in International Cooperation. Antwerp: Intersentia; 2006.
• [15]Alston P (Ed): Non State Actors and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
• [16]Koh HH: Transnational legal process. Neb L Rev 1996, 75:181.
• [17]Declaration on the Right to Development. 1987. G.A. Res. 41/128, 1986; U.N. GAOR, 41st Sess., Supp. No. 53, at 186–87, U.N. Doc. A/41/53 (1987)
• [18]Aust A: Handbook of International Law. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.
• [19]Bueno-de-Mesquita J, Hunt P, Kholsa R: The Human Rights Responsibility of International Assistance and Cooperation. In Universal Human Rights and Extraterritorial Obligations. Edited by Gibney M, Skogly S. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2010:112.
• [20]Hunt P, Backman G: Health Systems and the Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health. In Realizing the Right to Health. Edited by Clapham A, Robinson M. Ulm: Ruffer and Rub; 2009:57.
• [21]UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: General Comment No. 3, The Nature of States Parties’ Obligations. UN Doc. No. E/C.12/1991/23, 1990. http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(symbol)/CESCR+General+comment+3.En webcite
• [22]Salomon M: Global Responsibility for Human Rights: World Poverty and the Development of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
• [23]UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Summary Record of the 10th Meeting. 2000. http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(Symbol)/d8711da53e337f75802568d9003bc930 webcite
• [24]UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: The right to social security, General Comment No. 19. 2008. U.N. Doc. E/C.12/GC/19, 2008; para 61
• [25]Whiteside A: HIV/AIDS, A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008:4.
• [26]AIDSPAN: A Beginner’s Guide to the Global Fund. 2nd edition. 2011, 10. http://www.aidspan.org webcite
• [27]United Nations General Assembly Special Session (UNGASS): Declaration of Commitment on HIV/AIDS. New York: United Nations; 2001. http://www.unaids.org/en/media/unaids/contentassets/dataimport/publications/irc-pub03/aidsdeclaration_en.pdf webcite
• [28]Sridhar D, Gostin L: Reforming the World Health Organization. JAMA 2011. http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/623 webcite
• [29]The Global Fund: Geneva: The Framework Document of the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. 2002. http://www.theglobalfund.org/documents/TGF_Framework.pdf webcite
• [30]Louis H: How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy. 2nd edition. Columbia University Press: New York; 1979:47.
• [31]Payne R: Persuasion, frames and norm construction. European J Int Relations 2001, 7:37.
• [32]Wendt A: Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. Studies in International Relations (no. 67)
• [33]Finnemore M: National Interests in International Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1996.
• [34]Sorenson G, Jackson R: Introduction to International Relations; theories and approaches. 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007:162.
• [35]Cover R: The folktales of justice: tales of jurisdiction. In Narrative, Violence, and the Law: The Essays of Robert Cover. Edited by Minow M, Ryan M, Sarat A. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1992:198.
• [36]The Global Fund Observer. http://www:aidspan.org/index.php webcite
• [37]Yamin A: Beyond compassion: the central role of accountability in applying a human rights framework in health. Health Hum Right 2008, 10:1.
• [38]Deacon B: Global Social Policy & Governance. London: Sage; 2007:127.
• [39]Vandenbogaerde A, Vandenhole W: The optional protocol to the international covenant on economic, social and cultural rights: an ex ante assessment of its effectiveness in light of the drafting process. Hum Right Law Rev 2010, 10(2):207-237.
• [40]Langford M, Vandenhole W, Scheinin M, Genugten W (Eds): Global Justice, State Duties. The Extraterritorial Scope of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; forthcoming
• [41]Health and Human Rights 2010. 12:1. http://www.hhrjournal.org/index.php/hhr/issue/view/5 webcite
• [42]Gostin LO, Ooms G, Heywood M, Haffeld J, Mogedal S, Rottingen J-A, Friedman E, Siem H: The Joint Learning Initiative on National and Global Responsibilities for Health. http://section27.org.za.dedi47.cpt1.host-h.net/2010/11/23/jali/ webcite
• [43]Guzman A: A compliance based theory of international law. Calif Law Rev 2002, 90:1826-1867.
• [44]Eakin J, et al.: Towards a critical social science approach to health promotion research. Heal Promot Int 1996, 11(2):157-165.
• [45]Nixon S, Benatar S: A critical public-health ethics analysis of Canada’s international response to HIV. Global Publ Health 2011, 11:1-17.
• [46]De Schutter O: International Human Rights Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010:53-54.
• [47]Simma B, Alston P: The sources of human rights law: custom, jus cogens and general principles. Australian Yearbook Int Law 1988–1989, 82.
• [48]Vandenhole W: Economic, social and cultural rights in the CRC: is there a legal obligation to cooperate internationally for development? Int J Children’s Rights 2009, 17(1):23.
• [49]Alston P: Out of the abyss: the challenges confronting the new u.n. committee on economic, social and cultural rights. Hum Right Q 1987, 9(3):332-381.
• [50]Young K: The minimum core of economic and social rights: a concept in search of content. Yale J Int Law 2008, 33:113.
• [51]Tobin J: A constructive approach to treaty interpretation. Harvard Human Rights J 2010, 23:1.
• [52]Langford M, King J: Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Past, Present and Future. In Social Rights Jurisprudence, Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law. Edited by Langford M. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
• [53]Carrin G, Evans D, Xu D: Designing health financing policy towards universal coverage. WHO Bulletin 2007, 85:652.
• [54]Baker B: CTT-for Health/FTT-with Health: Resource Needs Estimates and an Assessment of Funding Modalities. Action for Global Health and International Civil Society Support; 2010. http://www.actionforglobalhealth.eu/fileadmin/AfGH_Intranet/AFGH/Publications/CTL-HSS_Funding_Mechanisms_Final.pdf webcite
• [55]The Maastricht guidelines on violations of economic, social and cultural rights Hum Right Q 1998, 20(3):691.
• [56]Robertson R: Measuring compliance with the obligation to devote the “maximum available resources” to realizing economic, social, and cultural rights. Hum Right Q 1994, 16(4):693.
• [57]Tomasevski K: Unanswered questions about economic, social and cultural rights from the experience of the special rapporteur on the right to education (1998–2004): a response to Kenneth Roth, Leonard S. Rubenstein and Mary Robinson’. Hum Right Q 2005, 27:14.
• [58]Mann JM, Gruskin S, Grodin MA, Annas GJ (Eds): Health and Human Rights: A Reader. New York: Routledge; 1999.
• [59]Gruskin S, Ferguson L, Peersman G, Rugg D: Human rights in the global response to HIV: findings from the 2008 UNGASS reports. JAIDS 2009, 52(suppl. 2):S104-S110.
• [60]Gruskin S: What are health and human rights? Lancet 2004, 363:1408.
• [61]The Global Fund: Technical Note 1: Illustrative Contribution Tables. Geneva; 2010. http://www:theglobalfund.org/en/donors/repleinishments/thirdreplenishment1stmeeting/downloads webcite
• [62]Kingsbury B: The concept of compliance as a function of competing conceptions of international law. Michigan J Int Law 1998, 19(2):345.
• [63]Keohane R: International Institutions and State Power-Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder: Westview Press; 1989.
• [64]Abbott K: Modern international relations theory: a prospectus for international lawyers. Yale J Int Law 1989, 14:355.
• [65]Slaughter A, Stone A: Assessing the effectiveness of international adjudication. Am Soc Int Law Proc 1995, 89:91.
• [66]Koh HH: The “Haiti Paradigm” in United States human rights policy. Yale Law J 1994, 103:2391. 2405–09
• [67]Koh HH: Is there a “new” New Haven school of international law? commentary. Yale J Int Law 2007, 32:559.
• [68]Levit J: Bottom-up international lawmaking: reflections on the new haven school of international law. Yale J Int Law 2007, 32:393.
• [69]Chayes A, Handler Chayes A: Compliance without enforcement: state behaviour under regulatory treaties. Negot J 1991, 7:311.
• [70]Goodman R, Jinks D: Incomplete internalization and compliance with human rights law. European J Int Law 2008, 19(4):725.
• [71]Cover RM: The Supreme Court, 1982 term-foreword: nomos and narrative. Harvard L Rev 1983, 97:4.
• [72]Van Damme W, Pirard M, Assefa Y, Van Olmen J: How can Disease Control Programmes Contribute to Health Systems Strengthening in Sub-Saharan Africa? Working Paper Series of the Studies in Health Services Organisation and Policy. Antwerp: ITM; 2010:1. http://www.itg.be/itg/Uploads/Volksgezondheid/wpshsop/SHSOP%20WP%201%20Van%20Damme%20DCP%20HSS.pdf webcite
• [73]Rajagopal B: International law and social movements: challenges of theorizing resistance. Columbia J Transnat Law 2003, 41:432-433.
• [74]Schrecker T, et al.: Advancing health equity in the global marketplace: how human rights can help. Soc Sci Med 2010, 71:1525.