期刊论文详细信息
BMC Infectious Diseases
Surgical site infections following coronary artery bypass graft procedures: 10 years of surveillance data
David Paterson2  Christopher Coulter3  John Marquess1  Prabha Lakhan1  Mohana Rajmokan1  Damin Si1 
[1]Centre for Healthcare Related Infection Surveillance and Prevention, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia
[2]University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Australia
[3]The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
关键词: Risk factors;    Pathogens;    Surgical site infections;    Coronary artery bypass graft surgery;   
Others  :  1127577
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2334-14-318
 received in 2014-02-05, accepted in 2014-05-30,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Surgical site infections following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedures pose substantial burden on patients and healthcare systems. This study aims to describe the incidence of surgical site infections and causative pathogens following CABG surgery over the period 2003–2012, and to identify risk factors for complex sternal site infections.

Methods

Routine computerised surveillance data were collected from three public hospitals in Queensland, Australia in which CABG surgery was performed between 2003 and 2012. Surgical site infection rates were calculated by types of infection (superficial/complex) and incision sites (sternal/harvest sites). Patient and procedural characteristics were evaluated as risk factors for complex sternal site infections using a logistic regression model.

Results

There were 1,702 surgical site infections (518 at sternal sites and 1,184 at harvest sites) following 14,546 CABG procedures performed. Among 732 pathogens isolated, Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus accounted for 28.3% of the isolates, Pseudomonas aeruginosa 18.3%, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus 14.6%, and Enterobacter species 6.7%. Proportions of Gram-negative bacteria elevated from 37.8% in 2003 to 61.8% in 2009, followed by a reduction to 42.4% in 2012. Crude rates of complex sternal site infections increased over the reporting period, ranging from 0.7% in 2004 to 2.6% in 2011. Two factors associated with increased risk of complex sternal site infections were identified: patients with an ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) score of 4 or 5 (reference score of 3, OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.36-2.47) and absence of documentation of antibiotic prophylaxis (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.12-3.69).

Conclusions

Compared with previous studies, our data indicate the importance of Gram-negative organisms as causative agents for surgical site infections following CABG surgery. An increase in complex sternal site infection rates can be partially explained by the increasing proportion of patients with more severe underlying disease.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Si et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150221012211850.pdf 639KB PDF download
Figure 2. 38KB Image download
Figure 1. 67KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Cristofolini M, Worlitzsch D, Wienke A, Silber RE, Borneff-Lipp M: Surgical site infections after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: incidence, perioperative hospital stay, readmissions, and revision surgeries. Infection 2012, 40:397-404.
  • [2]Hollenbeak CS, Murphy DM, Koenig S, Woodward RS, Dunagan WC, Fraser VJ: The clinical and economic impact of deep chest surgical site infections following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Chest 2000, 118:397-402.
  • [3]Jenney AW, Harrington GA, Russo PL, Spelman DW: Cost of surgical site infections following coronary artery bypass surgery. ANZ J Surg 2001, 71:662-664.
  • [4]Mayhall CG: Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control. 3rd edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004.
  • [5]Cruickshank M, Ferguson J: Reducing Harm to Patients from Health Care Associated Infection: The Role of Surveillance. Canberra: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care; 2008.
  • [6]Harrington G, Russo P, Spelman D, Borrell S, Watson K, Barr W, Martin R, Edmonds D, Cocks J, Greenbough J, Lowe J, Randle L, Castell J, Browne E, Bellis K, Aberline M: Surgical-site infection rates and risk factor analysis in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004, 25:472-476.
  • [7]Haley VB, Van Antwerpen C, Tsivitis M, Doughty D, Gase KA, Hazamy P, Tserenpuntsag B, Racz M, Yucel MR, McNutt LA, Stricof RL: Risk factors for coronary artery bypass graft chest surgical site infections in New York State, 2008. Am J Infect Control 2012, 40:22-28.
  • [8]Mannien J, Wille JC, Kloek JJ, van Benthem BH: Surveillance and epidemiology of surgical site infections after cardiothoracic surgery in The Netherlands, 2002–2007. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011, 141:899-904.
  • [9]Jarvis WR: Bennett & Brachman’s hospital infections. 5th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
  • [10]Richards MJ, Russo PL: Surveillance of hospital-acquired infections in Australia–One Nation, Many States. J Hosp Infect 2007, 65(Suppl 2):174-181.
  • [11]Clements AC, Tong EN, Morton AP, Whitby M: Risk stratification for surgical site infections in Australia: evaluation of the US National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance risk index. J Hosp Infect 2007, 66:148-155.
  • [12]Morton AP, Clements AC, Doidge SR, Stackelroth J, Curtis M, Whitby M: Surveillance of healthcare-acquired infections in Queensland, Australia: data and lessons from the first 5 years. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008, 29:695-701.
  • [13]National Centre for Classification in Health (NCCH): The Australian Classification of Health Interventions (ACHI). 6th edition. Sydney: NCCH, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney; 2007.
  • [14]Berrios-Torres SI, Mu Y, Edwards JR, Horan TC, Fridkin SK: Improved risk adjustment in public reporting: coronary artery bypass graft surgical site infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012, 33:463-469.
  • [15]Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG: CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992, 13:606-608.
  • [16]Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR: Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999, 20:250-278.
  • [17]Health Care Associated Infections Advisory Committee: Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Definition. Canberra: Australian Council on Safety and Quality in Health Care and Australian Infection Control Association; 2004.
  • [18]American Society of Anesthesiologists: New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 1963, 24:111.
  • [19]Berg TC, Kjorstad KE, Akselsen PE, Seim BE, Lower HL, Stenvik MN, Sorknes NK, Eriksen HM: National surveillance of surgical site infections after coronary artery bypass grafting in Norway: incidence and risk factors. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011, 40:1291-1297.
  • [20]Berrios-Torres SI, Yi SH, Bratzler DW, Ma A, Mu Y, Zhu L, Jernigan JA: Activity of commonly used antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens against pathogens causing coronary artery bypass graft and arthroplasty surgical site infections in the United States, 2006–2009. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014, 35:231-239.
  • [21]Fakih MG, Sharma M, Khatib R, Berriel-Cass D, Meisner S, Harrington S, Saravolatz L: Increase in the rate of sternal surgical site infection after coronary artery bypass graft: a marker of higher severity of illness. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007, 28:655-660.
  • [22]Gilbert DN, Moellering RC, Eliopoulos GM, Chambers HF, Saag MS: The Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy 2013. 43rd edition. Sperryville: Antimicrobial Therapy, Incorporated; 2013.
  • [23]Therapeutic Guidelines Limited: Prophylaxis: Cardiac Surgery. In eTG Complete [Internet]. Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Limited; 2013.
  • [24]Caparrelli DJ, Ghazoul M, Diethrich EB: Indications for coronary artery bypass grafting in 2009: what is left to surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2009, 50:19-28.
  • [25]Batista R, Kaye K, Yokoe DS: Admission-specific chronic disease scores as alternative predictors of surgical site infection for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006, 27:802-808.
  • [26]Paul M, Raz A, Leibovici L, Madar H, Holinger R, Rubinovitch B: Sternal wound infection after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: validation of existing risk scores. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007, 133:397-403.
  • [27]Friedman ND, Bull AL, Russo PL, Leder K, Reid C, Billah B, Marasco S, McBryde E, Richards MJ: An alternative scoring system to predict risk for surgical site infection complicating coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007, 28:1162-1168.
  • [28]Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Coronary Revascularisation in Australia, 2000. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2003.
  • [29]Whitby M, McLaws ML, Collopy B, Looke DF, Doidge S, Henderson B, Selvey L, Gardner G, Stackelroth J, Sartor A: Post-discharge surveillance: can patients reliably diagnose surgical wound infections? J Hosp Infect 2002, 52:155-160.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:19次 浏览次数:23次