期刊论文详细信息
BMC Oral Health
Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm in experimental primary and secondary endodontic infections
Markus J Altenburger2  Elmar Hellwig2  Karl-Thomas Wrbas2  Marie Follo1  Ali Al-Ahmad2  Edwina Haamann2  Katharina Feldmann2  Christian Tennert2 
[1] Department of Hematology and Oncology, Core Facility, University of Freiburg – Medical Center, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Freiburg – Medical Center, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
关键词: Enterococcus faecalis;    Endodontic infection;    Root canal disinfection;    Laser;    Phototherapy;    Photoactivated chemotherapy;    PDT;    Photodynamic therapy;   
Others  :  1091353
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6831-14-132
 received in 2014-06-13, accepted in 2014-10-18,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

To determine the antibacterial effect of photodynamic Therapy on Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) biofilms in experimentally infected human root canals in primary infections and endodontic retreatments.

Methods

One hundred and sixty single-rooted extracted teeth with one root canal were prepared using ProTaper instruments. Seventy specimens were left without root canal filling and autoclaved. The root canals of another 70 specimens were filled with Thermafil and AH Plus and the root canal fillings were removed after 24 hours using ProTaper D files and plasma sterilized. The specimens were infected with a clinical isolate of E. faecalis for 72 hours. Samples were taken using sterile paper points to determine the presence of E. faecalis in the root canals. The specimens were randomly divided into groups according to their treatment with 20 teeth each and a control. In the PDT group the teeth were treated using PDT, consisting of the photosensitizer toluidine blue and the PDT light source at 635 nm. In the NaOCl (sodium hypochlorite) group the root canals were rinsed with 10 mL of 3% NaOCl. In the NaOCl-PDT group the root canals were rinsed with 10 mL of 3% of sodium hypochlorite and then treated with PDT. Samples were taken after treatments using sterile paper points. Additionally, remaining root canal filling material was recovered from the root canal walls. Survival fractions of the samples were calculated by counting colony-forming units. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to the data to assess the effect of different treatment techniques.

Results

Antimicrobial treatment of root canals caused a significant reduction of bacterial load in all groups. NaOCl irrigation eliminated E. faecalis most effectively. PDT alone was less effective compared to NaOCl irrigation and the combination of NaOCl irrigation and PDT. CFU levels recovered from the filling material after NaOCl irrigation of the root canals were 10fold higher compared to PDT and the combination of NaOCl irrigation and PDT.

Conclusions

Photodynamic therapy killed E. faecalis in experimental primary endodontic infections and retreated human root canals. PDT is an effective supplement in root canal disinfection, especially in endodontic retreatments.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Tennert et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150128171240918.pdf 1375KB PDF download
Figure 1. 155KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Bystrom A, Sundqvist G: Bacteriologic evaluation of the effect of 0.5 percent sodium hypochlorite in endodontic therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1983, 55:307-312.
  • [2]Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K: Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature – part 2. Influence of clinical factors. Int Endod J 2008, 41:6-31.
  • [3]Nair PN, Henry S, Cano V, Vera J: Microbial status of apical root canal system of human mandibular first molars with primary apical periodontitis after “one-visit” endodontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005, 99:231-252.
  • [4]Hancock HH 3rd, Sigurdsson A, Trope M, Moiseiwitsch J: Bacteria isolated after unsuccessful endodontic treatment in a North American population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001, 91:579-586.
  • [5]Heling I, Gorfil C, Slutzky H, Kopolovic K, Zalkind M, Slutzky-Goldberg I: Endodontic failure caused by inadequate restorative procedures: review and treatment recommendations. J Prosthet Dent 2002, 87:674-678.
  • [6]Sjogren U, Figdor D, Persson S, Sundqvist G: Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 1997, 30:297-306.
  • [7]Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjogren U: Microbiologic analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative re-treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998, 85:86-93.
  • [8]Patel S, Barnes JJ: Contemporary endodontics - part 2. Br Dent J 2011, 211:517-524.
  • [9]Rodig T, Hausdorfer T, Konietschke F, Dullin C, Hahn W, Hulsmann M: Efficacy of D-RaCe and ProTaper Universal Retreatment NiTi instruments and hand files in removing gutta-percha from curved root canals - a micro-computed tomography study. Int Endod J 2012, 45:580-589.
  • [10]Roggendorf MJ, Legner M, Ebert J, Fillery E, Frankenberger R, Friedman S: Micro-CT evaluation of residual material in canals filled with Activ GP or GuttaFlow following removal with NiTi instruments. Int Endod J 2010, 43:200-209.
  • [11]Schirrmeister JF, Wrbas KT, Meyer KM, Altenburger MJ, Hellwig E: Efficacy of different rotary instruments for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment. J Endod 2006, 32:469-472.
  • [12]Bonsor SJ, Nichol R, Reid TM, Pearson GJ: An alternative regimen for root canal disinfection. Br Dent J 2006, 201:101-105. discussion 198; quiz 120
  • [13]Violich DR, Chandler NP: The smear layer in endodontics - a review. Int Endod J 2010, 43:2-15.
  • [14]Basrani BR, Manek S, Sodhi RN, Fillery E, Manzur A: Interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate. J Endod 2007, 33:966-969.
  • [15]Siqueira JF Jr: Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J 2001, 34:1-10.
  • [16]Peciuliene V, Balciuniene I, Eriksen HM, Haapasalo M: Isolation of Enterococcus faecalis in previously root-filled canals in a Lithuanian population. J Endod 2000, 26:593-595.
  • [17]Konopka K, Goslinski T: Photodynamic therapy in dentistry. J Dent Res 2007, 86:694-707.
  • [18]Meisel P, Kocher T: Photodynamic therapy for periodontal diseases: state of the art. J Photochem Photobiol B 2005, 79:159-170.
  • [19]Pinheiro SL, Schenka AA, Neto AA, de Souza CP, Rodriguez HM, Ribeiro MC: Photodynamic therapy in endodontic treatment of deciduous teeth. Lasers Med Sci 2009, 24:521-526.
  • [20]Sigusch BW, Pfitzner A, Albrecht V, Glockmann E: Efficacy of photodynamic therapy on inflammatory signs and two selected periodontopathogenic species in a beagle dog model. J Periodontol 2005, 76:1100-1105.
  • [21]Garcez AS, Fregnani ER, Rodriguez HM, Nunez SC, Sabino CP, Suzuki H, Ribeiro MS: The use of optical fiber in endodontic photodynamic therapy. Is it really relevant? Lasers Med Sci 2013, 28:79-85.
  • [22]Seal GJ, Ng YL, Spratt D, Bhatti M, Gulabivala K: An in vitro comparison of the bactericidal efficacy of lethal photosensitization or sodium hyphochlorite irrigation on Streptococcus intermedius biofilms in root canals. Int Endod J 2002, 35:268-274.
  • [23]Garcez AS, Nunez SC, Hamblin MR, Ribeiro MS: Antimicrobial effects of photodynamic therapy on patients with necrotic pulps and periapical lesion. J Endod 2008, 34:138-142.
  • [24]Garcez AS, Nunez SC, Hamblim MR, Suzuki H, Ribeiro MS: Photodynamic therapy associated with conventional endodontic treatment in patients with antibiotic-resistant microflora: a preliminary report. J Endod 2010, 36:1463-1466.
  • [25]Foschi F, Nucci C, Montebugnoli L, Marchionni S, Breschi L, Malagnino VA, Prati C: SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2004, 37:832-839.
  • [26]Gomes BP, Vianna ME, Matsumoto CU, Rossi Vde P, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC, Souza Filho FJ: Disinfection of gutta-percha cones with chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005, 100:512-517.
  • [27]Narayanan LL, Vaishnavi C: Endodontic microbiology. J Conserv Dent 2010, 13:233-239.
  • [28]Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante CM, Garcia RB, de Andrade FB, Bernardineli N, de Moraes IG, Duarte MA: The antimicrobial effect of new and conventional endodontic irrigants on intra-orally infected dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 2013, 71:424-431.
  • [29]Souza LC, Brito PR, de Oliveira JC, Alves FR, Moreira EJ, Sampaio-Filho HR, Rocas IN, Siqueira JF Jr: Photodynamic therapy with two different photosensitizers as a supplement to instrumentation/irrigation procedures in promoting intracanal reduction of Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod 2010, 36:292-296.
  • [30]Garcez AS, Ribeiro MS, Tegos GP, Nunez SC, Jorge AO, Hamblin MR: Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy combined with conventional endodontic treatment to eliminate root canal biofilm infection. Lasers Surg Med 2007, 39:59-66.
  • [31]Foley JW, Song X, Demidova TN, Jalil F, Hamblin MR: Synthesis and properties of benzo[a]phenoxazinium chalcogen analogues as novel broad-spectrum antimicrobial photosensitizers. J Med Chem 2006, 49:5291-5299.
  • [32]Sun J, Song X, Kristiansen BE, Kjaereng A, Willems RJ, Eriksen HM, Sundsfjord A, Sollid JE: Occurrence, population structure, and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci in marginal and apical periodontitis. J Clin Microbiol 2009, 47:2218-2225.
  • [33]Zoletti GO, Siqueira JF Jr, Santos KR: Identification of Enterococcus faecalis in root-filled teeth with or without periradicular lesions by culture-dependent and-independent approaches. J Endod 2006, 32:722-726.
  • [34]Love RM: Enterococcus faecalis–a mechanism for its role in endodontic failure. Int Endod J 2001, 34:399-405.
  • [35]Sedgley CM, Lennan SL, Appelbe OK: Survival of Enterococcus faecalis in root canals ex vivo. Int Endod J 2005, 38:735-742.
  • [36]George S, Kishen A, Song KP: The role of environmental changes on monospecies biofilm formation on root canal wall by Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod 2005, 31:867-872.
  • [37]Schirrmeister JF, Liebenow AL, Pelz K, Wittmer A, Serr A, Hellwig E, Al-Ahmad A: New bacterial compositions in root-filled teeth with periradicular lesions. J Endod 2009, 35:169-174.
  • [38]Tennert C, Fuhrmann M, Wittmer A, Karygianni L, Altenburger MJ, Pelz K, Hellwig E, Al-Ahmad A: New bacterial composition in primary and persistent/secondary endodontic infections with respect to clinical and radiographic findings. J Endod 2014, 40:670-677.
  • [39]Gorduysus M, Nagas E, Torun OY, Gorduysus O: A comparison of three rotary systems and hand instrumentation technique for the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from the root canal. Aust Endod J 2011, 37:128-133.
  • [40]Machado ME, Sapia LA, Cai S, Martins GH, Nabeshima CK: Comparison of two rotary systems in root canal preparation regarding disinfection. J Endod 2010, 36:1238-1240.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:13次 浏览次数:14次