期刊论文详细信息
BMC Genetics
Reproductive mode and fine-scale population genetic structure of grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae) in a viticultural area in California
Hong Lin3  Jeffrey Granett2  Michael Andrew Walker1  Tamara L Roush2  Md Sajedul Islam3 
[1] Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA;Department of Entomology, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA;USDA, Agricultural Resarch Service, USDA-ARS, San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center, 9611 South Riverbend Avenue, Parlier, CA 93648-9757, USA
关键词: Reproductive mode;    Genetic structure;    Genetic diversity;    Microsatellite marker;    Grape phylloxera;    Daktulosphaira vitifoliae;   
Others  :  1086101
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2156-14-123
 received in 2012-12-04, accepted in 2013-12-11,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae) is one of the world’s most important viticultural pests. However, the reproductive mode, genetic structure and host adaptation of phylloxera in various viticultural environments remains unclear. We examined reproductive mode and genetic structure of phylloxera by analyzing microsatellite makers across the samples from four vineyard-sites in California.

Result

The phylloxera populations in California are believed to have predominantly parthenogenetic reproduction. Therefore, genetic diversity of phylloxera is expected to be limited. However, this study showed relatively high levels of diversity in Napa and Yolo county populations with a large number of unique genotypes, average number of alleles (2.1 to 2.9) and observed heterozygosities (0.330 to 0.388) per vineyard-sites. Reproduction diversity index (G: N—unique genotypes versus number of samples) ranged from 0.500 to 0.656 among vineyard-sites. Both significant and non-significant Psex (probability of sexual reproduction) were observed among different repeated genotypes within each vineyard. Moreover, high variation of FIS was observed among different loci in each vineyard-site. Genetic structure analysis (UPGMA) and various measures of population differentiations (FST, PCA, and gene flow estimates) consistently separated AXR#1 (Vitis vinifera x V. rupestris—widely planted in California during the 1960s and 1970s) associated populations from the populations associated with other different rootstocks.

Conclusion

Genetic diversity, G: N ratio, Psex and FIS consistently suggested the occurrence of both parthenogenetic and sexual reproduction in California populations. This study clearly identified two major groups of phylloxera obtained from various rootstocks, with one group exclusively associated with only AXR#1 rootstock, defined as “biotype B”, and another group associated with vinifera-based rootstocks, known as “biotype A”.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Islam et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150113183159375.pdf 858KB PDF download
Figure 2. 40KB Image download
Figure 1. 150KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Granett J, Walker MA, Kocsis L, Omer AD: Biology and management of grape phylloxera. Annu Rev Entomol 2001, 46:387-412.
  • [2]Wapshere AJ, Helm KF: Phylloxera and Vitis: an experimentally testable co-evolutionary hypothesis. Amer J Enol Viticult 1987, 38:16-22.
  • [3]Granett J, Fong G, Walker A, Lin H, De Benedictis J, Weber E: California grape phylloxera more variable than expected. Calif Agric 1996, 50:9-13.
  • [4]Granett J, Bisabri-Ershadi B, Carey J: Life tables of phylloxera on resistant and susceptible grape rootstocks. Entomol Exper Applic 1983, 34:13-19.
  • [5]Granett J, Limper P, Lider LA: phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae) (Homoptera: Phylloxeridae) biotypes in California. J Econ Entomol 1985, 78:1463-1467.
  • [6]Forneck A, Huber L: (A)sexual reproduction – a review of life cycles of grape phylloxera, Daktulosphaira vitifoliae. Entomol Exper Applic 2009, 131:1-10.
  • [7]Davidson WM, Nougaret RL: The grape phylloxera in California. Washington, DC, USA: United States Department of Agriculture; ; 1921. Bulletin 903
  • [8]Vorwerk S, Forneck A: Reproductive mode of grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae, Homoptera: Phylloxeridae) in Europe: molecular evidence for predominantly asexual populations and a lack of gene flow between them. Genome 2006, 49:678-687.
  • [9]Corrie AM, Crozier RH, Van Heeswijck R, Hoffmann AA: Clonal reproduction and population genetic structure of grape phylloxera, Daktulosphaira vitifoliae, in Australia. Heredity 2002, 88:203-211.
  • [10]Corrie AM, Hoffmann AA: Fine-scale genetic structure of grape phylloxera from the roots and leaves of Vitis. Heredity 2004, 92:118-127.
  • [11]Forneck A, Walker MA, Blaich R: Genetic structure of an introduced pest, grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae Fitch), in Europe. Genome 2000, 43:669-678.
  • [12]Lin H, Walker MA, Hu R, Granett J: New simple sequence repeat loci for the study of grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae) genetics and host adaptation. Amer J Enol Viticult 2006, 57:33-40.
  • [13]Downie DA: Locating the sources of an invasive pest, grape phylloxera, using a mitochondrial DNA gene genealogy. Mol Ecol 2002, 11:2013-2026.
  • [14]Fong G, Walker MA, Granett J: RAPD assessment of California phylloxera diversity. Mol Ecol 1995, 4:459-464.
  • [15]Downie DA, Granett J, Fisher JR: Distribution and abundance of leaf galling and foliar sexual morphs of grape phylloxera (Hemiptera: Phylloxeridae) and Vitis species in the central and eastern United States. Environ Entomol 2000, 29:979-986.
  • [16]Lin H, Downie DA, Walker MA, Granett J, English-Loeb G: Genetic structure in native populations of grape phylloxera (Homoptera: Phylloxeridae). Annal Entomol S Amer 1999, 92:376-381.
  • [17]Sunnucks P, De Barro PJ, Lushai G, Maclean N, Hales D: Genetic structure of an aphid studied using microsatellites: cyclic parthenogenesis, differentiated lineages and host specialization. Mol Ecol 1997, 6:1059-1073.
  • [18]Hales DH, Tomiuk J, Wöhrmann K, Sunnucks P: Evolutionary and genetic aspects of aphid biology: a review. Eur J Entomol 1997, 94:1-55.
  • [19]Sunnucks P, England PR, Taylor AC, Hales DF: Microsatellite and chromosome evolution of parthenogenetic Sitobion aphids in Australia. Genetics 1996, 144:747-756.
  • [20]Fuller SJ, Chavigny P, Lapchin L, Vanlerberghe-Masutti F: Variation in clonal diversity in glasshouse infestations of the aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover in southern France. Mol Ecol 1999, 8:1867-1877.
  • [21]Simon JC, Baumann S, Sunnucks P, Hebert PD, Pierre JS, Le Gallic JF, Dedryver CA: Reproductive mode and population genetic structure of the cereal aphid Sitobion avenae studied using phenotypic and microsatellite markers. Mol Ecol 1999, 8:531-545.
  • [22]Wilson AC, Sunnucks P, Hales DF: Microevolution, low clonal diversity and genetic affinities of parthenogenetic sitobion aphids in New Zealand. Mol Ecol 1999, 8:1655-1666.
  • [23]Wilson GA, Rannala B: Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 2003, 163:1177-1191.
  • [24]Halkett F, Simon JC, Balloux F: Tackling the population genetics of clonal and partially clonal organisms. Trends Ecol Evol 2005, 20:194-201.
  • [25]Ivens AB, Kronauer DJ, Pen I, Weissing FJ, Boomsma JJ: Reproduction and dispersal in an ant-associated root aphid community. Mol Ecol 2012, 21:4257-4269.
  • [26]de Meeus T, Balloux F: Clonal reproduction and linkage disequilibrium in diploids: a simulation study. Infect Genet Evol 2004, 4:345-351.
  • [27]Balloux F: Heterozygote excess in small populations and the heterozygote-excess effective population size. Evolution 2004, 58:1891-1900.
  • [28]Stellwaag-Kittler F: Das Auftreten der geflügelten Reblaus. Der Deutsche Weinbau, 24 1954, 24:737-738.
  • [29]Downie DA, Granett J: A life cycle variation in grape phylloxera. Southwest Entomol 1998, 23:11-16.
  • [30]Downie DA: Effects of short-term spontaneous mutation accumulation for life history traits in grape phylloxera, Daktulosphaira vitifoliae. Genetica 2003, 119:237-251.
  • [31]Kimberling DN, Price PW: Competition, leaf morphology, and host clone effects on leaf-galling grape phylloxera (Homoptera: Phylloxeridae). Environ Entomol 1996, 25:1147-1153.
  • [32]Kocsis L, Granett J, Walker MA, Lin H, Omer AD: Grape phylloxera populations adapted to Vitis berlandieri x V.riparia rootstocks. Amer J Enol Viticult 1999, 50:101-106.
  • [33]Forneck A, Walker MA, Blaich R: An in vitro assessment of phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae Fitch) life cycle. J Appl Entomol 2001, 125:1052-1054.
  • [34]Corrie AM, van Heeswijck R, Hoffmann AA: Evidence for host-associated clones of grape phylloxera Daktulosphaira vitifoliae (Hemiptera: Phylloxeridae) in Australia. Bull Entomol Res 2003, 93:193-201.
  • [35]Downie DA: Patterns of genetic variation in native grape phylloxera on two sympatric host species. Mol Ecol 2000, 9:505-514.
  • [36]Qing-Hua S, Ying-Chun C, Hai-Bo W, Downie DA, Heng Z: Origin and genetic diversity of grape phylloxera in China. Acta Entomol Sin 2009, 52:885-894.
  • [37]Lin H, Walker MA: Extraction of DNA from a single egg of grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae Fitch) for use in RAPD testing. Vitis 1996, 35:87-89.
  • [38]Stenberg P, Lundmark M, Saura A: MLGsim: a program for detecting clones using a simulation approach. Mol Ecol Notes 2003, 2:329-331.
  • [39]Ivey CT, Richards JH: Genetic diversity of everglades sawgrass, Cladium jamaicense (Cyperaceae). Internat J Plant Sci 2001, 162:817-825.
  • [40]Peakall R, Smouse P: GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 2006, 6:288-295.
  • [41]Nei M: Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 1978, 89:583-590.
  • [42]Goudet J: FSTAT (Version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 1995, 86:485-486.
  • [43]Wright S: Evolution and the genetics of populations. Variability within and among natural populations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1978.
  • [44]Raymond M, Rousset F: GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 1995, 86:248-249.
  • [45]Guo SW, Thompson EA: Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics 1992, 48:361-372.
  • [46]Nei M, Tajima F, Tateno Y: Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data. J Mol Evol 1983, 19:153-170.
  • [47]Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol and Evol 2007, 24:1596-1599.
  • [48]Pearse DE, Crandall KA: Beyond FST: analysis of population genetic data for conservation. Conserv Genet 2004, 5:585-602.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:14次 浏览次数:17次