BMC Medical Education | |
The use of clinical guidelines highlights ongoing educational gaps in physicians’ knowledge and decision making related to diabetes | |
Rita Rastogi Kalyani2  Frederick L Brancati1  Stephen D Sisson1  Laura B Minang2  Mark D Corriere2  | |
[1] Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA;Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, & Metabolism, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1830 East Monument Street, Suite 333, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA | |
关键词: Education; Clinical Guidelines; Diabetes; | |
Others : 1091480 DOI : 10.1186/1472-6920-14-186 |
|
received in 2014-05-14, accepted in 2014-09-02, 发布年份 2014 | |
【 摘 要 】
Background
Clinical guidelines for type 2 diabetes are a resource for providers to manage their patients and may help highlight specific areas in need of further education and training. We sought to determine how often guidelines are used and the relationship to physicians’ diabetes-related knowledge and decision making.
Methods
Existing users of electronic clinical support tools were invited to complete an online questionnaire. A knowledge score was calculated for five questions related to prevention of diabetes and treatment of its complications. We explored the association of clinical guideline use with diabetes-related knowledge and self-reported decision making using logistic regression models, adjusted for key covariates.
Results
Of 383 physicians completing the questionnaire, 53% reported using diabetes guidelines routinely. Mean diabetes knowledge score for guideline users (GU) was significantly higher than non-guideline users (NGU) (3.37 ± 0.072 vs. 2.76 ± 0.084; p < 0.001). GU were significantly more likely to report a good understanding of type 2 diabetes medications (OR = 2.99, 95% CI 1.95-4.61; p < 0.001). GU were less likely to report their unfamiliarity with insulin as an important barrier to early insulin use (OR = 0.41, 0.21-0.80; p = 0.007) and with pharmacologic options as a barrier to prescribing intensive multifactorial interventions (OR = 0.32, 0.17-0.58; p < 0.001). Associations remained significant after adjusting for physician specialty, practice volume and frequency diagnosing or treating diabetes patients.
Conclusions
Significant gaps exist in diabetes-related knowledge and decision making among practicing physicians, as highlighted by clinical guideline use. The development of educational and training strategies to address these needs may ultimately improve outcomes for patients with diabetes and should be investigated in the future.
【 授权许可】
2014 Corriere et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
20150128172308301.pdf | 179KB | download |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: National Diabetes Statistics Report. Estimates of Diabetes and its Burden in the United States, 2014. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.
- [2]Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Gregg EW, Barker LE, Williamson DF: Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: Dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and prediabetes prevalence. Popul Health Metr 2010, 8:29-7954-8-29.
- [3]Huang ES, Basu A, O’Grady M, Capretta JC: Projecting the future diabetes population size and related costs for the U.S. Diabetes Care 2009, 32(12):2225-2229.
- [4]Sisson SD, Bertram A: Changes in knowledge of diabetes guidelines during internal medicine residency training. Prim Care Diabetes 2010, 4(3):193-195.
- [5]George JT, Warriner D, McGrane DJ, Rozario KS, Price HC, Wilmot EG, Kar P, Stratton IM, Jude EB, McKay GA, TOPDOC Diabetes Study Team: Lack of confidence among trainee doctors in the management of diabetes: The trainees own perception of delivery of care (TOPDOC) diabetes study. QJM 2011, 104(9):761-766.
- [6]George JT, Warriner DA, Anthony J, Rozario KS, Xavier S, Jude EB, McKay GA: Training tomorrow’s doctors in diabetes: Self-reported confidence levels, practice and perceived training needs of post-graduate trainee doctors in the UK. A multi-centre survey. BMC Med Educ 2008, 8:22-6920-8-22.
- [7]Rodbard HW, Jellinger PS, Davidson JA, Einhorn D, Garber AJ, Grunberger G, Handelsman Y, Horton ES, Lebovitz H, Levy P, Moghissi ES, Schwartz SS: Statement by an american association of clinical Endocrinologists/American college of endocrinology consensus panel on type 2 diabetes mellitus: an algorithm for glycemic control. Endocr Pract 2009, 15(6):540-559.
- [8]Perez CM, Febo-Vazquez I, Guzman M, Ortiz AP, Suarez E: Are adults diagnosed with diabetes achieving the American diabetes association clinical practice recommendations? P R Health Sci J 2012, 31(1):18-23.
- [9]American Diabetes Association: Standards of medical care in diabetes--2014. Diabetes Care 2014, 37(Suppl 1):S14-80.
- [10]Stark Casagrande S, Fradkin JE, Saydah SH, Rust KF, Cowie CC: The prevalence of meeting A1C, blood pressure, and LDL goals among people with diabetes, 1988–2010. Diabetes Care 2013, 36(8):2271-2279.
- [11]Seidu S, Khunti K: Non-adherence to diabetes guidelines in primary care - the enemy of evidence-based practice. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012, 95(3):301-302.
- [12]Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, Ferrannini E, Holman RR, Sherwin R, Zinman B, American Diabetes Association: Medical management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009, 32(1):193-203.
- [13]Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, Diamant M, Ferrannini E, Nauck M, Peters AL, Tsapas A, Wender R, Matthews DR, American Diabetes Association (ADA), European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD): Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: Position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2012, 35(6):1364-1379.
- [14]Garber AJ, Abrahamson MJ, Barzilay JI, Blonde L, Bloomgarden ZT, Bush MA, Dagogo-Jack S, Davidson MB, Einhorn D, Garvey WT, Grunberger G, Handelsman Y, Hirsch IB, Jellinger PS, McGill JB, Mechanick JI, Rosenblit PD, Umpierrez G, Davidson MH, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists: AACE comprehensive diabetes management algorithm 2013. Endocr Pract 2013, 19(2):327-336.
- [15]Brown JB, Harris SB, Webster-Bogaert S, Wetmore S, Faulds C, Stewart M: The role of patient, physician and systemic factors in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Fam Pract 2002, 19(4):344-349.
- [16]Furthauer J, Flamm M, Sonnichsen A: Patient and physician related factors of adherence to evidence based guidelines in diabetes mellitus type 2, cardiovascular disease and prevention: a cross sectional study. BMC Fam Pract 2013, 14:47-2296-14-47.
- [17]Grimshaw JM, Russell IT: Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 1993, 342(8883):1317-1322.
- [18]Cortes-Sanabria L, Cabrera-Pivaral CE, Cueto-Manzano AM, Rojas-Campos E, Barragan G, Hernandez-Anaya M, Martinez-Ramirez HR: Improving care of patients with diabetes and CKD: a pilot study for a cluster-randomized trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2008, 51(5):777-788.
- [19]Vidal-Pardo JI, Perez-Castro TR, Lopez-Alvarez XL, Santiago-Perez MI, Garcia-Soidan FJ, Muniz J: Effect of an educational intervention in primary care physicians on the compliance of indicators of good clinical practice in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus [OBTEDIGA project. Int J Clin Pract 2013, 67(8):750-758.
- [20]Vinicor F, Cohen SJ, Mazzuca SA, Moorman N, Wheeler M, Kuebler T, Swanson S, Ours P, Fineberg SE, Gordon EE: DIABEDS: a randomized trial of the effects of physician and/or patient education on diabetes patient outcomes. J Chronic Dis 1987, 40(4):345-356.
- [21]Deichmann RE, Castello E, Horswell R, Friday KE: Improvements in diabetic care as measured by HbA1c after a physician education project. Diabetes Care 1999, 22(10):1612-1616.
- [22]Sammer CE, Lykens K, Singh KP: Physician characteristics and the reported effect of evidence-based practice guidelines. Health Serv Res 2008, 43(2):569-581.
- [23]Salinas GD, Williamson JC, Kalhan R, Thomashow B, Scheckermann JL, Walsh J, Abdolrasulnia M, Foster JA: Barriers to adherence to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease guidelines by primary care physicians. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2011, 6:171-179.
- [24]Casey DE: Why don’t physicians (and patients) consistently follow clinical practice guidelines?: Comment on “worsening trends in the management and treatment of back pain”. JAMA Intern Med 2013, 173(17):1581-3.
- [25]Zwolsman S, te Pas E, Hooft L, Wieringa-de Waard M, van Dijk N: Barriers to GPs’ use of evidence-based medicine: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 2012, 62(600):e511-21.