Clinical identification of patients readmitted to hospitals: why patients return

BMC Research Notes

Mary Luziani²  Diane Nanno³  Ronald J Lagoe¹ 

[1] Hospital Executive Council, PO Box 35089, Syracuse, NY 13235, USA;Care Management, St. Joseph’s Hospital Health Center, Syracuse, NY 13203, USA;Transition Care Services, Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA

关键词: Pneumonia;    Heart failure;    Hospital outcomes;    Hospital readmissions;   

Others  :  1141328
DOI  :  10.1186/1756-0500-6-419

 received in 2013-04-25, accepted in 2013-10-11,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Increased interest in hospital outcomes has supported the need for clear and useful identification of patients who are readmitted. These patients have frequently been identified by the principal diagnosis of the initial admission.

Findings

In order to evaluate the effectiveness of identifying patients who were subsequently readmitted, those with two frequently encountered conditions, principal diagnoses of congestive heart failure and pneumonia, in the hospitals of Syracuse New York were evaluated. Both populations had large proportions of readmissions involved with principal diagnoses other than pneumonia. For patients with heart failure, a majority of readmitted patients had other diagnoses for two of the hospitals. For patients with pneumonia, a majority of patients had other diagnoses for all of the hospitals.

Conclusions

The data suggested that many patients who were subsequently readmitted are best identified as medicine patients with multiple diagnoses, rather than a single one. This approach addresses the need to manage a wide range of conditions for hospital readmissions, rather than a narrow approach on individual diagnosis.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Lagoe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Dentzer S: Urgent measures for an old problem. Health Aff 2011, 30(9):1626.
• [2]Stabile M, Thomson S, Allin S, Boyle S, Busse R, Chevreaul K, Marchildon G, Mossialos E: Health care cost containment strategies used in four other high-income countries hold lessons for the United States. Health Aff 2013, 32(4):643-652.
• [3]Hoonhout LH, de Bruijne MC, Wagner C, Zegers W, Waajman R, Spreeuwenberg P, Asscheman H, van der Wal G, van MW T: Direct medical costs of adverse events in Dutch hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res 2009, 9:27. BioMed Central Full Text
• [4]Ashton CM, et al.: The association between quality of inpatient care and early readmission: meta-analysis of the evidence. Med Care 1997, 35(10):1044-1059.
• [5]Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA: Rehospitalizations among patients in the medicare fee for service program. N Engl J Med 2011, 364(16):1582.
• [6]Zegers M, de Bruijne MC, Wagner C, Hoonhout LHF, Waaijman R, Smits M: Adverse events and potentially preventable deaths in Dutch hospitals: results of a retrospective review study. Qual Health Care 2009, 18(4):297-302.
• [7]Gianino MM, Vallino A, Minniti D, Abbona F, Mineccia C, Silvaplana P, Zotti CM: A model for calculating costs of hospital-acquired infections: an Italian experience. J Health Organ Manag 2007, 21(1):39-53.
• [8]Krumholz H, Lin Z, Keenan P, Chen J, Ross J: Relationship between hospital readmission and mortality rates for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, or pneumonia. JAMA 2013, 309(6):587-593.
• [9]Rau J: Medicare to penalize 2,211 hospitals for excess readmissions. Menlo Park, California: Kaiser Health News; 2012.
• [10]Hospital Case Management: Include all diagnoses, payers in readmissions projects. Hosp Case Manag 2012, 20:97-112.
• [11]Goldfield NI, McCullough EC, Hughes JS, Tang AM, Eastman B, Rawlins LK, Averill RF: Identifying potentially preventable readmissions. Health Care Financ Rev 2008, 30(1):75-92.
• [12]Lagoe R, Pasinski T, Kronenberg P, Quinn T, Schaengold P: Linking health services at the community level. Can Healthc Q 2006, 9(3):60-65.
• [13]Lagoe R, Nanno S, Luziani M: Quantitative tools for addressing hospital readmissions. BMC Res Notes 2012, 5:620-627. BioMed Central Full Text
• [14]U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Hospital readmissions measures. Washington, D.C: Department of Health and Human Services; 2012.
• [15]Berenson RA, Paulus RA, Kalman NS: Medicare’s readmission reduction program – A positive alternative. N Engl J Med 2012, 366(15):1364-1366.