期刊论文详细信息
Heritage Science
Damage function for historic paper. Part I: Fitness for use
Matija Strlič4  Carlota M. Grossi4  Catherine Dillon4  Nancy Bell5  Kalliopi Fouseki4  Peter Brimblecombe6  Eva Menart4  Kostas Ntanos5  William Lindsay5  David Thickett3  Fenella France2  Gerrit De Bruin1 
[1] Nationaal Archief, The Hague, The Netherlands
[2] Library of Congress, Washington DC, USA
[3] English Heritage, London, UK
[4] Institute for Sustainable Heritage, University College London, London, UK
[5] The National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, UK
[6] University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
关键词: Statistical experimental design (DOE);    Psychometrics;    Fitness for use;    Heritage values;    Conservation;    Heritage management;   
Others  :  1231825
DOI  :  10.1186/s40494-015-0062-1
 received in 2015-07-06, accepted in 2015-10-19,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

In heritage science literature and in preventive conservation practice, damage functions are used to model material behaviour and specifically damage (unacceptable change), as a result of the presence of a stressor over time. For such functions to be of use in the context of collection management, it is important to define a range of parameters, such as who the stakeholders are (e.g. the public, curators, researchers), the mode of use (e.g. display, storage, manual handling), the long-term planning horizon (i.e. when in the future it is deemed acceptable for an item to become damaged or unfit for use), and what the threshold of damage is, i.e. extent of physical change assessed as damage.

Results

In this paper, we explore the threshold of fitness for use for archival and library paper documents used for display or reading in the context of access in reading rooms by the general public. Change is considered in the context of discolouration and mechanical deterioration such as tears and missing pieces: forms of physical deterioration that accumulate with time in libraries and archives. We also explore whether the threshold fitness for use is defined differently for objects perceived to be of different value, and for different modes of use. The data were collected in a series of fitness-for-use workshops carried out with readers/visitors in heritage institutions using principles of Design of Experiments.

Conclusions

The results show that when no particular value is pre-assigned to an archival or library document, missing pieces influenced readers/visitors’ subjective judgements of fitness-for-use to a greater extent than did discolouration and tears (which had little or no influence). This finding was most apparent in the display context in comparison to the reading room context. The finding also best applied when readers/visitors were not given a value scenario (in comparison to when they were asked to think about the document having personal or historic value). It can be estimated that, in general, items become unfit when text is evidently missing. However, if the visitor/reader is prompted to think of a document in terms of its historic value, then change in a document has little impact on fitness for use.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Strlič et al.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20151111012930477.pdf 1769KB PDF download
Fig.8. 17KB Image download
Fig.7. 30KB Image download
Fig.6. 36KB Image download
Fig.5. 35KB Image download
Fig.4. 25KB Image download
Fig.3. 43KB Image download
Fig.2. 65KB Image download
Fig.1. 59KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig.1.

Fig.2.

Fig.3.

Fig.4.

Fig.5.

Fig.6.

Fig.7.

Fig.8.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Strlič M, Thickett D, Taylor J, Cassar M. Damage functions in heritage science. Stud Conserv. 2013; 58:80-87.
  • [2]Dillon C, Lindsay W, Taylor J, Fouseki K, Bell N, Strlič M. Collections demography: stakeholders’ views on the lifetime of collections. In: Climate for collections conference, Munich, Doerner Institut, 7–9 November 2012, Postprints. Ashley-Smith J, Burmester A, Eibl M, editors. Archetype, London; 2013: p.45-58.
  • [3]Robb JE. Quantitative assessment of stakeholder attitudes to geological collections for improved collections management, MRes Thesis, UCL Centre for Sustainable Heritage. 2012.
  • [4]Lindsay W. Time perspectives: what ‘the future’ means to museum professionals in collections-care. The Conservator. 2005; 29:51-61.
  • [5]Jones S, Holden J. It is a material world: caring for the public realm. DEMOS, London; 2008.
  • [6]Clark K. From significance to sustainability. In: Capturing the public value of heritage—the proceedings of the London conference, 25–26 January 2006. Clark K, editor. English Heritage, Swindon; 2006: p.59-60.
  • [7]Mason R. Assessing values in conservation planning: methodological issues and choices. In: Assessing the values of cultural heritage. Torre M, editor. J. Paul Getty Trust, Los Angeles; 2002: p.5-30.
  • [8]Cossons N. Capturing the values of places—opening remarks. In: Capturing the public value of heritage—the proceedings of the london conference, 25–26 January 2006. Clark K, editor. English Heritage, Swindon; 2006: p.70.
  • [9]Throsby D. The value of cultural heritage: what can economics tell us? In: Capturing the public value of heritage—the proceedings of the London conference, 25–26 January 2006. Clark K, editor. English Heritage, Swindon; 2006: p.40-43.
  • [10]Jowell T. From consultation to conversation: the challenge of better places to live. In: Capturing the public value of heritage—the proceedings of the London conference, 25–26 January 2006. Clark K, editor. English Heritage, Swindon; 2006: p.7-13.
  • [11]Langford M. Colour and conventions. In: European colour photography. London: The Photographer’s Gallery Ltd. 1978.
  • [12]Engeldrum PG. A theory of image quality: the image quality circle. J Imaging Sci Technol. 2003; 48:447-457.
  • [13]Baird JC, Noma E. Fundamentals of scaling and psychophysics. Wiley Series in Behavior. Wiley, New York; 1978.
  • [14]Ehrenstein WH, Ehrenstein A. Pyschophysical methods. Modern techniques in neuroscience research. Windhorst U, Johansson H, editors. Springer, Berlin; 1999.
  • [15]British Standards Institution. BS ISO 20462-1:2005(E) Photography—psychophysical experimental methods for estimating image quality. 2006.
  • [16]Bradley JS, Reich R, Norcross SG. A just noticeable difference in c-50 for speech. Appl Acoustics. 1999; 58:99-108.
  • [17]Ashley-Smith J, Derbyshire A, Pretzel B. The continuing development of a practical lighting policy for works of art on paper and other object types at the Victoria and Albert museum. In: ICOM-CC 13th Triennial meeting, Rio de Janeiro. Bridgland J, editor. James & James Ltd., London; 2002: p.3-8.
  • [18]Crawford BH. Just perceptible colour difference in relation to level of illumination. Stud Conserv. 1973; 18:159-166.
  • [19]Michalski S. The lighting decision. In: Fabric of an exhibition, preprints of textile symposium. Ottawa: Canadian Conservation Institute. 1997. pp. 97–104.
  • [20]Brokerhof AW, Reuss M, MacKinnon F, Ligterink F, Neevel H, Fekrsanati F, Scott G. Optimum access at minimum risk: the dilemma of displaying Japanese woodblock prints. In: Conservation and Access: 2008 IIC Congress, London. 2008.
  • [21]Derbyshire A, Ashley-Smith J. A proposed practical lighting policy for works of art on paper at the V&A. In: ICOM Committee for Conservation 12th Triennial Meeting, volume 1, Lyon. Bridgland J, editor. James & James Ltd., London; 1999: p.38-41.
  • [22]Richardson C, Saunders D. Acceptable light damage: a preliminary investigation. Stud Conserv. 2007; 52:177-187.
  • [23]Ehrenstein WH, Ehrenstein A. Pyschophysical methods. Modern techniques in neuroscience research. Windhorst U, Johansson H, editors. Springer, Berlin; 1999.
  • [24]British Standards Institution: BS ISO 20462-1:2005(E) Photography—psychophysical experimental methods for estimating image quality. 2006.
  • [25]British Standards Institution: BS ISO 20462-2:2005(E) Photography—psychophysical experimental methods for estimating image quality. 2006.
  • [26]Box GEP, Hunter JS, Hunter WG. Statistics for experimenters : design, innovation, and discovery. 2nd ed. Wiley, Hoboken NJ; 2005.
  • [27]Yamini Y, Saleh A, Khajeh M. Orthogonal array design for the optimization of supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of platinum(IV) and rhenium(VII) from a solid matrix using cyanex 301. Separ Purif Technol. 2008; 61:109-114.
  • [28]Vanaja K, Shobha Rani RH. Design of experiments: concept and applications of Plackett Burman design. Clin Res Regul Aff. 2007; 24:1-23.
  • [29]Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992; 112:155-159.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:95次 浏览次数:26次