期刊论文详细信息
Heritage Science
Damage function for historic paper. Part III: Isochrones and demography of collections
Matija Strlič4  Carlota M. Grossi4  Catherine Dillon4  Nancy Bell5  Kalliopi Fouseki4  Peter Brimblecombe6  Eva Menart4  Kostas Ntanos5  William Lindsay5  David Thickett3  Fenella France2  Gerrit De Bruin1 
[1] Nationaal Archief, The Hague, The Netherlands
[2] Library of Congress, Washington DC, USA
[3] English Heritage, London, UK
[4] Institute for Sustainable Heritage, University College London, London, UK
[5] The National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, UK
[6] University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
关键词: Libraries and archives;    Wear and tear;    Fitness for use;    Collection modelling;    Preventive conservation;   
Others  :  1234993
DOI  :  10.1186/s40494-015-0069-7
 received in 2015-10-10, accepted in 2015-12-08,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

In the context of evidence-based management of historic collections, a damage function combines aspects of material degradation, use, and consideration of material attributes that are important for satisfactory extraction of benefits from user interaction with heritage. In libraries and archives, it has been shown that users (readers and visitors) are mainly concerned with loss of textual information, which could lead to degradation being described as unacceptable, at which an object might become unfit for use and therefore damaged. The contribution explores the development of the damage function for historic paper based on data available in the literature.

Results

We have modelled the dose–response function taking into account 121 paper degradation experiments with known T, RH of the environment, and pH of paper. The function is based on the Arrhenius equation and published water absorption isotherm functions for paper. New isoperm plots have been calculated and isochrones have been developed. These are plots linking points of equal expected ‘lifetime’, i.e. time until an object is expected to reach the state of threshold fitness-for-use. We also modelled demographic curves for a well-characterised research collection of historic papers, exploring the loss of fitness for use with time.

Conclusions

The new tools enable us to evaluate scenarios of management of the storage environment as well as levels of access, for different types of library and archival paper. In addition, the costs and benefits of conservation interventions can be evaluated. The limitations of the function are the context of use (dark storage and reading), exclusive focus on the properties of an average paper type, and de-prioritised effect of pollutants; however, the latter can be considered separately. This work also demonstrates that transparent and publically accountable collection management decisions can be informed, and challenged by, effective interaction with a variety of stakeholders including the lay public.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Strlič et al.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20151227010545504.pdf 2581KB PDF download
Fig.6. 65KB Image download
Fig.5. 56KB Image download
Fig.4. 32KB Image download
Fig.3. 75KB Image download
Fig.2. 19KB Image download
Fig.1. 18KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig.1.

Fig.2.

Fig.3.

Fig.4.

Fig.5.

Fig.6.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Strlič M, Grossi-Sampedro C, Dillon C, Bell N, Fouseki K, Brimblecombe P, Menart E, Ntanos K, Lindsay W, Thickett D, France F, De Bruin G. Damage function for historic paper. Part I: fitness for use. Her Sci. 2015; 3:33. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [2]Strlič M, Grossi-Sampedro C, Dillon C, Bell N, Fouseki K, Brimblecombe P, Menart E, Ntanos K, Lindsay W, Thickett D, France F, De Bruin G. Damage function for historic paper. Part II: wear and tear. Her Sci. 2015; 3:36. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [3]Strlič M, Thickett D, Taylor J, Cassar M. Damage functions in heritage science. Stud Conserv. 2013; 58:80-87.
  • [4]Zervos S. Natural and accelerated ageing of cellulose and paper: a literature review. In: Cellulose structure and properties, derivatives and industrial uses. Lejeune A, Deprez T, editors. Nova Science Publishers, Happauge NY; 2010: p.155-203.
  • [5]Menart E, De Bruin G, Strlič M. Dose-response functions for historic paper. Polym Degrad Stab. 2011; 96:2029-2039.
  • [6]Strlic M, Kolar J. Ageing and stabilisation of paper. National and University Library, Ljubljana; 2005.
  • [7]Ekenstam A: Über das Verhalten der Cellulose in Mineralsäure-lösungen, II. Mitteil: Kinetisches Studium des abbaus der Cellulose in Säure-lösungen. Ber Dtsch Chem Ges. 1936; 69:553–559.
  • [8]Emsley AM, Stevens GC. Kinetics and mechanisms of the low-temperature degradation of cellulose. Cellulose. 1994; 1:26-56.
  • [9]Zou X, Uesaka T, Gurnagul N. Prediction of paper permanence by accelerated aging I. Kinetic analysis of the aging process. Cellulose. 1996; 3:243-267.
  • [10]Strlič M, Kolar J, Kočar D, Drnovsek T, Selih VS, Susic R, Pihlar B. What is the pH of alkaline paper? e-Preservation Sci. 2004; 1:35-47.
  • [11]Sebera DK. Isoperms. An environmental management tool, http://cool-palimpsest.stanford.edu/byauth/sebera/isoperm/index.html. Accessed 3 Aug 2015.
  • [12]Strang T, Grattan D. Temperature and humidity considerations for the preservation of organic collections—the isoperm revisited. e-Preservation Sci. 2009; 6:122-128.
  • [13]Parker ME, Bronlund JE, Mawson AJ. Moisture sorption isotherms for paper and paperboard in food chain conditions. Packag Technol Sci. 2006; 19:193-209.
  • [14]eClimateNotebook: https://www.imagepermanenceinstitute.org/environmental-management/eclimatenotebook. Accessed 3 Aug 2015.
  • [15]Paltakari JT, Karlsson MA: Determination of specific heat for dry fibre material. 82nd Annual meeting, Technical Section, CPPA, 1996, B117-B120.
  • [16]Menart E, De Bruin G, Strlič M. Effects of NO 2 and acetic acid on the stability of historic paper. Cellulose. 2014; 21:3701-3713.
  • [17]Sedlbauer K. Prediction of mould growth by hygrothermal calculation. J Build Phys. 2002; 25:321-336.
  • [18]Zou X, Uesaka T, Gurnagul N. Prediction of paper permanence by accelerated aging. 2. Comparison of the predictions with natural aging results. Cellulose. 1996; 3:269-279.
  • [19]Baranski A, Lagan JM, Lojewski T. Acid-catalysed degradation. In: Ageing and stabilisation of paper. Strlic M, Kolar J, editors. National and University Library, Ljubljana; 2005: p.85-100.
  • [20]Kolar J, Strlič M: Enhancing the lifespan of paper-based collections. In: 35th AIC Annual Meeting Richmond VA, 16–20 April 2007.
  • [21]Strlič M, Kolar J, Zigon M, Pihlar B. Evaluation of size-exclusion chromatography and viscometry for the determination of molecular masses of oxidised cellulose. J Chromatogr A. 1998; 805:93-99.
  • [22]Evans R, Wallis A. Comparison of cellulose molecular weights determined by high performance size exclusion chromatography and viscometry. Proc Fourth Int Symp Wood Pulping Chem Paris. 1987; 1:201-205.
  • [23]Hong SH, Strlič M, Ridley I, Ntanos K, Bell N, Cassar M. Climate change mitigation strategies for mechanically controlled repositories: the case of The National Archives, Kew. Atm Env. 2012; 49:163-170.
  • [24]Fenech A, Dillon C, Ntanos K, Bell N, Barrett M, Strlič M. Modelling the lifetime of colour photographs in archival collections. Stud Conserv. 2013; 58:107-116.
  • [25]Kolar J, Štolfa A, Strlič M, Pompe M, Pihlar B, Budnar M, Simčič J, Reissland B. Historical iron gall ink containing documents—properties affecting their condition. Anal Chim Acta. 2006; 555:167-174.
  • [26]Lichtblau DA, Strlič M, Trafela T, Kolar J, Anders M. Determination of mechanical properties of historical paper based on NIR spectroscopy and chemometrics—a new instrument. Appl Phys A. 2008; 92:191-195.
  • [27]Trafela T, Strlič M, Kolar J, Lichtblau DA, Anders M, Pucko Mencigar D, Pihlar B. Non-destructive analysis and dating of historical paper based on IR spectroscopy and chemometric data evaluation. Anal Chem. 2007; 79:6319-6323.
  • [28]SurveNIR website, http://www.science4heritage.org/survenir/collection (accessed 3 August 2015).
  • [29]Barański A, Konieczna-Molenda A, Łagan JM, Proniewicz LM. Catastrophic room temperature degradation of cotton cellulose. Restaurator. 2003; 24:36-45.
  • [30]PAS198:2012. Specification for managing environmental conditions for cultural collections. The British Standards Institution, 2012.
  • [31]Oriola M, Campo G, Ruiz-Recasens C, Pedragosa N, Strlič M. Conservation management scenario appraisal for painting canvases at Museu Nacional d’Art de Catalunya. Stud Conserv. 2015; 60:S193-S199.
  • [32]Fouseki K, Sakka N. Valuing an ancient palaestra in the centre of Athens: The public, the experts, and Aristotle. Conserv Manag Archaeol Sites. 2013; 15:30-44.
  • [33]McDonald H. Understanding the antecedents to public interest and engagement with heritage. Eur J Marketing. 2011; 45:780-804.
  • [34]Fouseki K. Community voices, curatorial choices: community consultation for the 1807 exhibitions. Mus Soc. 2010; 8:180-192.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:98次 浏览次数:62次