Analysis of different model-based approaches for estimating dFRC for real-time application

BioMedical Engineering OnLine

Erwin J van Drunen³  J Geoffrey Chase³  Yeong Shiong Chiew³  Geoffrey M Shaw¹  Thomas Desaive² 

[1] Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, 8011, New Zealand

[2] University of Liège, Liège, Belgium

[3] University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 8041, New Zealand

关键词: ICU;    Intensive care;    ARDS;    Model-based methods;    Pulmonary;    PEEP;    dFRC;    FRC;    Functional residual capacity;    Mechanical ventilation;   

Others  :  797949
DOI  :  10.1186/1475-925X-12-9

 received in 2012-10-18, accepted in 2013-01-25,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by inflammation, filling of the lung with fluid and the collapse of lung units. Mechanical ventilation (MV) is used to treat ARDS using positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) to recruit and retain lung units, thus increasing pulmonary volume and dynamic functional residual capacity (dFRC) at the end of expiration. However, simple, non-invasive methods to estimate dFRC do not exist.

Methods

Four model-based methods for estimating dFRC are compared based on their performance on two separate clinical data cohorts. The methods are derived from either stress-strain theory or a single compartment lung model, and use commonly controlled or measured parameters (lung compliance, plateau airway pressure, pressure-volume (PV) data). Population constants are determined for the stress-strain approach, which is implemented using data at both single and multiple PEEP levels. Estimated values are compared to clinically measured values to assess the reliability of each method for each cohort individually and combined.

Results

The stress-strain multiple breath (at multiple PEEP levels) method produced an overall correlation coefficient R² = 0.966. The stress-strain single breath method produced R² = 0.530. The single compartment single breath method produced R² = 0.415. A combined method at single and multiple PEEP levels produced R² = 0.963.

Conclusions

The results suggest that model-based, single breath and non-invasive approaches to estimating dFRC may be viable in a clinical scenario, ensuring no interruption to MV. The models provide a means of estimating dFRC at any PEEP level. However, model limitations and large estimation errors limit the use of the methods at very low PEEP.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 van Drunen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]The ADTF: Acute respiratory distress syndrome: The berlin definition. JAMA: J Am Med Assoc 2012, 307(23):2526-2533.
• [2]Gattinoni L, Pesenti A: The concept of "baby lung". Intensive Care Med 2005, 31(6):776-784.
• [3]Bersten AD, Edibam C, Hunt T, Moran J, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group: Incidence and mortality of acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome in three Australian states. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002, 165(4):443-448.
• [4]Ware LB, Matthay MA: The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000, 342(18):1334-1349.
• [5]Amato MB, Barbas CS, Medeiros DM, Magaldi RB, Schettino GP, Lorenzi-Filho G, Kairalla RA, Deheinzelin D, Munoz C, Oliveira R, Takagaki TY, Carvalho CR: Effect of a Protective-Ventilation Strategy on Mortality in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N Engl J Med 1998, 338(6):347-354.
• [6]The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000, 342(18):1301-1308.
• [7]McCann UG, Schiller HJ, Carney DE, Gatto LA, Steinberg JM, Nieman GF: Visual validation of the mechanical stabilizing effects of positive end-expiratory pressure at the alveolar level. J Surg Res 2001, 99(2):335-342.
• [8]Halter JM, Steinberg JM, Schiller HJ, DaSilva M, Gatto LA, Landas S, Nieman GF: Positive end-expiratory pressure after a recruitment maneuver prevents both alveolar collapse and recruitment/derecruitment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003, 167(12):1620-1626.
• [9]Bersten AD: Measurement of overinflation by multiple linear regression analysis in patients with acute lung injury. Eur Respir J 1998, 12(3):526-532.
• [10]Dasta JF, McLaughlin TP, Mody SH, Piech CT: Daily cost of an intensive care unit day: the contribution to mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 2005, 33:1141-1143.
• [11]Heinze H, Schaaf B, Grefer J, Klotz K, Eichler W: The Accuracy of the oxygen washout technique for functional residual capacity assessment during spontaneous breathing. Anesth Analg 2007, 104(3):598-604.
• [12]Malbouisson LM, Muller J-C, Constantin J-M, Lu QIN, Puybasset L, Rouby J-J, the CTSASG: Computed tomography assessment of positive end-expiratory pressure-induced alveolar recruitment in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001, 163(6):1444-1450.
• [13]Zhao Z, Steinmann D, Muller-Zivkovic D, Martin J, Frerichs I, Guttmann J, Moller K: A lung area estimation method for analysis of ventilation inhomogeneity based on electrical impedance tomography. J Xray Sci Technol 2010, 18:171-182.
• [14]Zhao Z, Moller K, Steinmann D, Frerichs I, Guttmann J: Evaluation of an electrical impedance tomography-based global inhomogeneity index for pulmonary ventilation distribution. Intensive Care Med 2009, 35:1900-1906.
• [15]Sundaresan A, Chase JG, Hann CE, Shaw GM: Dynamic functional residual capacity can be estimated using a stress-strain approach. Comput Meth Programs Biomed 2011, 101(2):135-143.
• [16]Mishra A, Chiew YS, Shaw GM, Chase JG: Model-Based Approach to Estimate dFRC in the ICU Using Measured Lung Dynamics. 8th IFAC Symposium on Biological and Medical Systems; 2012:8.
• [17]Chiumello D, Carlesso E, Cadringher P, Caironi P, Valenza F, Polli F, Tallarini F, Cozzi P, Cressoni M, Colombo A, Marini JJ, Gattinoni L: Lung stress and strain during mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008, 178(4):346-355.
• [18]Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Carlesso E, Valenza F: Bench-to-bedside review: chest wall elastance in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. Crit Care 2004, 8(5):350-355. BioMed Central Full Text
• [19]Bates JH: Lung Mechanics: An inverse Modelling Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009:37-44.
• [20]Carvalho ARS, Jandre FC, Pino AV, Bozza FA, Salluh J, Rodrigues R, Ascoli FO, Giannella-Neto A: Positive end-expiratory pressure at minimal respiratory elastance represents the best compromise between mechanical stress and lung aeration in oleic acid induced lung injury. Crit Care 2007, 11(4):R86. BioMed Central Full Text
• [21]Eberhard L, Guttmann J, Wolff G, Bertschmann W, Minzer A, Kohl HJ, Zeravik J, Adolph M, Eckart J: Intrinsic PEEP monitored in the ventilated ARDS patient with a mathematical method. J Appl Physiol 1992, 73(2):479-485.
• [22]Stenqvist O, Grivans C, Andersson B, Lundin S: Lung elastance and transpulmonary pressure can be determined without using oesophageal pressure measurements. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012, 56(6):738-747.
• [23]Hann CE, Chase JG, Lin J, Lotz T, Doran CV, Shaw GM: Integral-based parameter identification for long-term dynamic verification of a glucose-insulin system model. Comput Meth Programs Biomed 2005, 77(3):259-270.
• [24]Sundaresan A, Chase J, Shaw G, Chiew YS, Desaive T: Model-based optimal PEEP in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients in the Intensive Care Unit. Biomed Eng Online 2011, 10(1):64. BioMed Central Full Text
• [25]Rees SE, Kjærgaard S, Thorgaard P, Malczynski J, Toft E, Andreassen S: The Automatic Lung Parameter Estimator (ALPE) System: non-invasive estimation of pulmonary gas exchange parameters in 10-15 minutes. J Clin Monit Comput 2002, 17(1):43-52.