In this thesis, I study various issues about the 『περὶ τρόπων』(De Tropis) of the Alexandrian grammarian Tryphon. First of all, the authorship problem of the work is which I specifically review. The next thing is resources and attributes of the work itself. And I extract the novum stemma textuum from various editions written by several authors including Tryphon, and the novum stemma codicum applied by a new manuscript. Finally I furnish the critica editio, i.e. ancient greek text, together with apparatus criticus and loci similes.There are currently seven works in ancient and medieval Greek, which are handed down under the name of 『περὶ τρόπων』 or 『περὶ τρόπων ποιητικῶν』. Among them, four works had trasmitted with author names except three works, and the most ancient work is originally written by Tryphon in 1st century BC. The authorship issue between Tryphon and Gregory of Corinth(12c) was happened by two co-existed edition of 『περὶ τρόπων』 under the Tryphon’s name. On the on hand, the first half of both works has similarity, even litterally, but on the other hand, they have the dissimilar order and some different texts and examples. So, several scholars and editors have attributed the second version of 『περὶ τρόπων』 to Gregory. On the contrary, other scholars have argued that opinion, and suggested that both editions, so-called Tryphon 1 and Tryphon 2, separately derived from original Tryphon.For this reason, it is primarily neccessary to research the process of the authorship issue between Tryphon and Gregory. The origin of the attribution to Gregory of Corinth was the statement by the philologist in 17c, who reported an edition of 『περὶ τρόπων』 without author’s name to assign to Gregory. Afterward, the critical edition under the name of Gregory have published by several philologists and editors. However, the evidences which support the authorship of Tryphon are more concrete and specific. This crucial turning point was originated from the AD 4-5c papyrus, which preserve partial texts of Tryphon2’s edition and support the Tryphon authorship as the earlier proof than Gregory’s period. Nevertheless some scholars still refuse the attribution to Tryphon without particular evidences for Gregory. However, the proof for that fact that Tryphon is genuine author is widely based on not only papyrus, but also many manuscripts and medieval literatures, even definitive difference between works by Gregory and 『περὶ τρόπων』 of Tryphon. Therefore, it is certain that the author of this edition is not Gregory of Corinth, but Tryphon.In next section, I analyze resources concerning the 『περὶ τρόπων』 and the structure of itself. Its resources are based on Aristotle who have a strong influence on the Alexandrian scholarship, Dionysius Thrax who is the first author of systematic theory on the ancient grammar. This work also is the mutual and interactive relation to other Alexandrian scholars at the same and after period with Tryphon. The continuity between 『περὶ τρόπων』 and the Alexandrian scholarship tradition is drew from abundant vestiges remained in 『Scholia Homerica』, although many works written by the Alexandrian scholars is lost. For the structure of 『περὶ τρόπων』, it is constituted by the definition of each tropes and example statements, namely it has the technical modus, which was typically adopted during the ancient period. Then, just as rhetoric textbooks, it were used as the educational book to read poetry such like 『Ilias』 or 『Odysseia』 for students.Thirdly, it is examined how the seven works are transmitted specifically among them, despite of the same entitled as 『περὶ τρόπων』. So I compare all of them to find parallel texts. As a result, It is certain that the whole editions of 『περὶ τρόπων』 is originally dependent to the Tryphon tradition, and later editions is divided between the ancient tradition and the Christianized tradition. Therefore, I extract the Novum Stemma Textuum from the analysis about correlations among individual editions.To deduce a more faithful reconstruction, I reflect the new found manuscript, Venice gr. Z. 512(13c) on it. This manuscript is belongs to the oldest period, even the earlier thing than other manuscripts from 15c and even maintains distinguished variants and exclusive texts. By reflecting this venice manuscript and examining transmission of all, it is able to draw Novum Stemma Codicum.Finally, I offer the nova critica editio, based on Venice gr. Z. 512 including apparatus criticus, corrected and reflected by the new manuscript. This critical edition is inserted loci similes, that is not only 『Scholia Homerica』 and Quintilian’s 『Institutio Oratoria』 and various ancient texts, but also parallel texts excerpted from other 『περὶ τρόπων』.
PDF
download
878987797
028-85220240
