科技报告详细信息
Who Wins and Who Loses from Staple Food Price Spikes? : Welfare Implications for Mozambique
Baez, Javier E. ; Caruso, German ; Pullabhotla, Hemant
World Bank, Washington, DC
关键词: FOOD PRICES;    HOUSEHOLD WELFARE;    CONSUMPTION;    POVERTY;    FOOD SECURITY;   
RP-ID  :  137631
学科分类:社会科学、人文和艺术(综合)
来源: World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Changes in food prices – triggeredfrequently by natural disasters, macroeconomic shocks orregional market disruptions– can lead to large householdwelfare effects. At over 60 and 40 percent, food budgetshares remain high in rural and urban Mozambique,respectively. Furthermore, nearly 70 percent of thepopulation depends on agriculture for their livelihoods. Todetermine the net impact of food price changes onconsumption and poverty, we performed incidence analysiscombining household and farmer survey data withdisaggregated, market-level price data on major staples(maize, rice, and cassava). Overall, we find evidence for alarge net negative welfare effect of price rises in ruralareas, and a small, negative effect in the urban areas. Forinstance, A 10 percent increase in maize prices isassociated with an average reduction of 1.2 percent inconsumption per capita in rural areas and 0.2 percent inurban areas. Not all households are affected equally.Overall, the negative impacts are larger for the bottom halfof the distribution. As a result, the sharp food price spikeobserved in 2016–17 may have translated into a povertyincrease of 4-6 percentage points, with some of the poorestprovinces bearing much of the brunt. These findingsunderscore the importance of improving the functioning ofagricultural input and output markets, developing early foodsecurity warning systems, and increasing the availability ofrapidly scalable safety nets.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
Who-Wins-and-Who-Loses-from-Staple-Food-Price-Spikes-Welfare-Implications-for-Mozambique.pdf 422KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:9次 浏览次数:7次