Excited Utterances, "Testimonial" Statements, and the Confrontation Clause

Yeh, Brian T

Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.

关键词: Constitution;    Supreme Court;    Constitutional amendments - U.S. - 6;    Law;   

RP-ID  :  RL33195
RP-ID  :  RL33195 2005-12-14

美国|英语

来源: UNT Digital Library

【 摘 要 】

The United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument this term in appeals from two state supreme court cases, Hammon v. Indiana and Davis v. Washington, concerning the admissibility of “excited utterance” statements made by non-testifying witnesses at criminal trials. In the landmark Crawford v. Washington case in 2004, the Court held that the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause forbids hearsay “testimonial” evidence from being introduced against the accused unless the witness is unavailable to testify and the defendant has had a prior opportunity to crossexamine the witness. However, the Crawford Court declined to provide a comprehensive definition of “testimonial,” leaving such task “for another day.”