科技报告详细信息
The role of opacity and transparency in achieving strategic stability in South Asia.
Rajain, Arpit (New Delhi, India) ; Ashraf, Tariq Mahmud (Islamabad, Pakistan)
Sandia National Laboratories
关键词: Pakistan;    Security;    99 General And Miscellaneous//Mathematics, Computing, And Information Science;    Monitoring;    Deterrence (Strategy);   
DOI  :  10.2172/974409
RP-ID  :  SAND2005-4957
RP-ID  :  AC04-94AL85000
RP-ID  :  974409
美国|英语
来源: UNT Digital Library
PDF
【 摘 要 】

According to international relations theory, deterrence can be used as a tool to achieve stability between potentially hostile nations. India and Pakistan's long history of periodic crises raises the question of how they can achieve deterrence stability. 'Transparency' describes the flow of information between parties and plays a key role in establishing a deterrence relationship. This paper studies the balance needed between opacity and transparency in nuclear topics for the maintenance of deterrence stability between India and Pakistan. States with nuclear weapons are postulated to implement transparency in four categories: potential, capability, intent, and resolve. The study applies these categories to the nuclear components of the ongoing India-Pakistan Composite Dialogue Working Group for Peace and Security including CBMs. To focus our efforts, we defined four scenarios to characterize representative strategic/military/political conditions. The scenarios are combinations of these two sets of opposite poles: competition - cooperation; extremism - moderation (to be understood primarily in a religious/nationalistic sense). We describe each scenario in terms of select focal areas (nuclear doctrine, nuclear command and control, nuclear stockpile, nuclear delivery/defensive systems, and conventional force posture). The scenarios help frame the realm of possibilities, and have been described in terms of expected conditions for the focal areas. We then use the conditions in each scenario to prescribe a range of information-sharing actions that the two countries could take to increase stability. We also highlight the information that should not be shared. These actions can be political (e.g., declarations), procedural (e.g., advance notice of certain military activities), or technologically based (e.g., seismic monitoring of the nuclear test moratorium).

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
974409.pdf 217KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:14次 浏览次数:15次