Characterization, Leaching, and Filtration Testing for Bismuth Phosphate Sludge (Group 1) and Bismuth Phosphate Saltcake (Group 2) Actual Waste Sample Composites

Lumetta, Gregg J. ; Buck, Edgar C. ; Daniel, Richard C. ; Draper, Kathryn ; Edwards, Matthew K. ; Fiskum, Sandra K. ; Hallen, Richard T. ; Jagoda, Lynette K. ; Jenson, Evan D. ; Kozelisky, Anne E. ; MacFarlan, Paul J. ; Peterson, Reid A. ; Shimskey, Rick W. ; Sinkov, Sergey I. ; Snow, Lanee A.

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (U.S.)

关键词: Leaching;    Sludges;    Radioactive Waste Processing;    Filtration;    Chemical Properties;   

DOI  :  10.2172/963596
RP-ID  :  PNNL-17992
RP-ID  :  AC05-76RL01830
RP-ID  :  963596

美国|英语

来源: UNT Digital Library

【 摘 要 】

A testing program evaluating actual tank waste was developed in response to Task 4 from the M-12 External Flowsheet Review Team (EFRT) issue response plan.() The test program was subdivided into logical increments. The bulk water-insoluble solid wastes that are anticipated to be delivered to the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) were identified according to type such that the actual waste testing could be targeted to the relevant categories. Eight broad waste groupings were defined. Samples available from the 222S archive were identified and obtained for testing. The actual waste-testing program included homogenizing the samples by group, characterizing the solids and aqueous phases, and performing parametric leaching tests. Two of the eight defined groups—bismuth phosphate sludge (Group 1) and bismuth phosphate saltcake (Group 2)—are the subjects of this report. The Group 1 waste was anticipated to be high in phosphorus and was implicitly assumed to be present as BiPO4 (however, results presented here indicate that the phosphate in Group 1 is actually present as amorphous iron(III) phosphate). The Group 2 waste was also anticipated to be high in phosphorus, but because of the relatively low bismuth content and higher aluminum content, it was anticipated that the Group 2 waste would contain a mixture of gibbsite, sodium phosphate, and aluminum phosphate. Thus, the focus of the Group 1 testing was on determining the behavior of P removal during caustic leaching, and the focus of the Group 2 testing was on the removal of both P and Al. The waste-type definition, archived sample conditions, homogenization activities, characterization (physical, chemical, radioisotope, and crystal habit), and caustic leaching behavior as functions of time, temperature, and hydroxide concentration are discussed in this report. Testing was conducted according to TP-RPP-WTP-467.