Laser Research and Development Studies for Laser Guide Star Systems

Pennington, D. ; Beach, R. ; Ebbers, C. ; Erbert, G. ; Nguyen, H. ; Page, R. ; Payne, S. ; Perry, M.

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

关键词: Testing;    Wavelengths;    Resonators;    70 Plasma Physics And Fusion Technology;    Amplifiers;   

DOI  :  10.2172/793459
RP-ID  :  UCRL-ID-137684
RP-ID  :  W-7405-Eng-48
RP-ID  :  793459

美国|英语

来源: UNT Digital Library

【 摘 要 】

In this paper we consider two CW solid state laser approaches to a 589 nm LGS system. Both are based on the technique of sum-frequency generation, but differ in the cavity architecture. Both technologies are very promising and are worth of further consideration. This preliminary proposal is intended to encompass both designs. A down select shall be performed early in the project execution to focus on the most promising option. The two design options consist of: (1) A dual-frequency resonator with intra-cavity doubling in LB0 offers the promise of a simple architecture and may scale more easily to high power. This design has been shown to be highly reliable, efficient and high power when used in frequency-doubled Nd:YAG lasers for programs at LLNL and in commercial products. The challenge in this design is the demonstration of a high power13 18 nm oscillator with adequate suppression of the 1064 nm line. (2) A MOPA based design uses commercial low power oscillators to produce both wavelengths, then amplifies the wavelengths before doubling. This design requires the demonstration of a 1318 nm amplifier, though the design is scaled from a kW CW amplifier already delivered to a customer at a different wavelength. The design must also demonstrate high power scaling of sum-frequency generation in the relatively new nonlinear material, PPLN. The first step in the process would be to further evaluate the two conceptual options for technical feasibility, cost and constructability. Then a down selection to one design would be conducted. Finally, R&D on that design would then proceed. Minimal testing should be required for this selection. The majority of the funding received would be allocated to development of the design selected.