科技报告详细信息
Estimating the greenhouse gas benefits of forestry projects: A Costa Rican Case Study
Busch, Christopher ; Sathaye, Jayant ; Sanchez Azofeifa, G. Arturo
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
关键词: Climatic Change;    Forests;    Revegetation;    Sensitivity Analysis;    Land Use;   
DOI  :  10.2172/764328
RP-ID  :  LBNL--42289
RP-ID  :  AC03-76SF00098
RP-ID  :  764328
美国|英语
来源: UNT Digital Library
PDF
【 摘 要 】

If the Clean Development Mechanism proposed under the Kyoto Protocol is to serve as an effective means for combating global climate change, it will depend upon reliable estimates of greenhouse gas benefits. This paper sketches the theoretical basis for estimating the greenhouse gas benefits of forestry projects and suggests lessons learned based on a case study of Costa Rica's Protected Areas Project, which is a 500,000 hectare effort to reduce deforestation and enhance reforestation. The Protected Areas Project in many senses advances the state of the art for Clean Development Mechanism-type forestry projects, as does the third-party verification work of SGS International Certification Services on the project. Nonetheless, sensitivity analysis shows that carbon benefit estimates for the project vary widely based on the imputed deforestation rate in the baseline scenario, e.g. the deforestation rate expected if the project were not implemented. This, along with a newly available national dataset that confirms other research showing a slower rate of deforestation in Costa Rica, suggests that the use of the 1979--1992 forest cover data originally as the basis for estimating carbon savings should be reconsidered. When the newly available data is substituted, carbon savings amount to 8.9 Mt (million tones) of carbon, down from the original estimate of 15.7 Mt. The primary general conclusion is that project developers should give more attention to the forecasting land use and land cover change scenarios underlying estimates of greenhouse gas benefits.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
764328.pdf 528KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:7次 浏览次数:3次