Regulatory Assistance, Stakeholder Outreach, and Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Activities In Support Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Deployment: Task 2.1.7 Permitting and Planning Fiscal Year 2012 Year-End Report

Geerlofs, Simon H. ; Hanna, Luke A. ; Judd, Chaeli R. ; Blake, Kara M.

关键词: Marine Hydrokinetic;    Marine Spatial Planning;    Energy Permitting;    Education and Outreach;   

DOI  :  10.2172/1118121
RP-ID  :  PNNL-21876
PID  :  OSTI ID: 1118121
Others  :  Other: EB4500000

美国|英语

来源: SciTech Connect

【 摘 要 】

This fiscal year 2012 year-end report summarizes activities carried out under DOE Water Power task 2.1.7, Permitting and Planning. Activities under Task 2.1.7 address the concerns of a wide range of stakeholders with an interest in the development of the MHK industry, including regulatory and resource management agencies, tribes, NGOs, and industry. Objectives for 2.1.7 are the following: ??? To work with stakeholders to streamline the MHK regulatory permitting process. ??? To work with stakeholders to gather information on needs and priorities for environmental assessment of MHK development. ??? To communicate research findings and directions to the MHK industry and stakeholders. ??? To engage in spatial planning processes in order to further the development of the MHK industry. These objectives are met through three subtasks, each of which are described in this report: ??? 2.1.7.1???Regulatory Assistance ??? 2.1.7.2???Stakeholder Outreach ??? 2.1.7.3???Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning As the MHK industry works with the regulatory community and stakeholders to plan, site, permit and license MHK technologies they have an interest in a predictable, efficient, and transparent process. Stakeholders and regulators have an interest in processes that result in sustainable use of ocean space with minimal effects to existing ocean users. Both stakeholders and regulators have an interest in avoiding legal challenges by meeting the intent of federal, state, and local laws that govern siting and operation of MHK technologies. The intention of work under 2.1.7 is to understand these varied interests, explore mechanisms to reduce conflict, identify efficiencies, and ultimately identify pathways to reduce the regulatory costs, time, and potential environmental impacts associated with developing, siting, permitting, and deploying MHK systems.