Coincident Aerosol and H2O Retrievals versus HSI Imager Field Campaign ReportH2O Retrievals versus HSI Imager Field Campaign Report

Anderson, Gail P.²  Cipar, John³  Armstrong, Peter S.³  van den Bosch, J.³ 

[1] Pacific Northwest National Laboratory;National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Washington, DC (United States);Air Force Research Lab. (AFRL), Wright-Patterson AFB, OH (United States)

关键词: Surface albedo;    aerosols;    shortwave radiation;    satellite spectrometer;   

DOI  :  10.2172/1254294
RP-ID  :  DOE/SC--ARM-14-041
PID  :  OSTI ID: 1254294

学科分类：环境科学（综合）

美国|英语

来源: SciTech Connect

【 摘 要 】

Two spectrally calibrated tarpaulins (tarps) were co-located at a fixed Global Positioning System (GPS) position on the gravel antenna field at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Climate Research Facility???s Southern Great Plains (SGP) site. Their placement was timed to coincide with the overflight of a new hyperspectral imaging satellite. The intention was to provide an analysis of the data obtained, including the measured and retrieved spectral albedos for the calibration tarps. Subsequently, a full suite of retrieved values of H2O column, and the aerosol overburden, were to be compared to those determined by alternate SGP ground truth assets. To the extent possible, the down-looking cloud images would be assessed against the all-sky images. Because cloud contamination above a certain level precludes the inversion processing of the satellite data, coupled with infrequent targeting opportunities, clear-sky conditions were imposed. The SGP site was chosen not only as a target of opportunity for satellite validation, but as perhaps the best coincident field measurement site, as established by DOE???s ARM Facility. The satellite team had every expectation of using the information obtained from the SGP to improve the inversion products for all subsequent satellite images, including the cloud and radiative models and parameterizations and, thereby, the performance assessment for subsequent and historic image collections. Coordinating with the SGP onsite team, four visits, all in 2009, to the Central Facility occurred: ??? June 6-8 (successful exploratory visit to plan tarp placements, etc.) ??? July 18-24 (canceled because of forecast for heavy clouds) ??? Sep 9-12 (ground tarps placed, onset of clouds) ??? Nov 7-9 (visit ultimately canceled because of weather predictions). As noted, in each instance, any significant overcast prediction precluded image collection from the satellite. Given the long task-scheduling procedures (which were in place for each time period), coupled with other priorities and the satellite lifetime, no alternate SGP images could be obtained.