Efficacy and safety of sublingual ramelteon as an adjunctive therapy in the maintenance treatment of bipolar I disorder in adults: A phase 3, randomized controlled trial

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS

卷:221

Article

Mahableshwarkar, Atul R.¹  Calabrese, Joseph R.²  Macek, Thomas A.¹  Budur, Kumar³  Adefuye, Adedeji⁵  Dong, Xinxin¹  Hanson, Elizabeth¹  Sachs, Gary S.⁴ 

[1] Takeda Dev Ctr Amer Inc, One Takeda Pkwy, Deerfield, IL 60015 USA

[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Mood Disorders Program,Univ Hosp,Case Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA

[3] AbbVie Inc, N Chicago, IL USA

[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA

[5] Baxalta, Chicago, IL USA

关键词: Bipolar disorder;    Maintenance;    Melatonin receptor agonist;    Relapse;   

DOI  :  10.1016/j.jad.2017.06.044

来源: Elsevier

【 摘 要 】

Background: The optimal long-term management strategy for bipolar I disorder patients is not yet established. Evidence supports the rationale for circadian rhythm regulation to prevent mood episode relapse in bipolar patients. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a new sublingual formulation of the melatonin receptor agonist ramelteon (ramelteon SL) as adjunctive therapy in the maintenance treatment of bipolar I patients. Methods: In a double-blinded trial in the United States and Latin America, adult bipolar I disorder patients stable for >= 8 weeks before baseline and with a mood episode 8 weeks to 9 months before screening, were randomized to once-daily ramelteon SL 0.1 mg (n = 164), 0.4 mg (n = 160), or 0.8 mg (n = 154), or placebo (n = 164), in addition to their existing treatment. The primary endpoint was time from randomization to relapse of symptoms. The prespecified futility criterion in a planned, unblinded, independent interim analysis was the failure of all ramelteon SL doses to achieve a conditional power >= 30% compared with placebo. Results: No significant differences between any dose of ramelteon SL and placebo were observed. The study was terminated after meeting the futility criteria. Ramelteon SL was well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with that for oral ramelteon. Limitations: A low rate of relapse events precluded detection of any statistically significant difference between groups. Conclusions: The study failed to demonstrate the efficacy of ramelteon SL as adjunctive maintenance therapy for bipolar disorder. Interim analyses for futility in clinical studies are valuable in preventing unnecessary exposure of subjects to interventions.

【 授权许可】

Free