JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY | 卷:556 |
Temporal transferability of soil moisture calibration equations | |
Article | |
Rowlandso, Tracy L.1  Berg, Aaron A.1  Bullock, Paul R.2  Hanis-Gervais, Krista2  Ojo, E. RoTimi3  Cosh, Michael H.4  Powers, Jarrett5  McNairn, Heather5  | |
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Geog, Guelph, ON, Canada | |
[2] Univ Manitoba, Dept Soil Sci, Winnipeg, MB, Canada | |
[3] Manitoba Agr Food & Rural Dev, Winnipeg, MB, Canada | |
[4] USDA ARS, Hydrol & Remote Sensing Lab, Washington, DC 20250 USA | |
[5] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Sci & Technol Branch, Ottawa, ON, Canada | |
关键词: Soil moisture; Calibration; Impedance probes; | |
DOI : 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.11.023 | |
来源: Elsevier | |
【 摘 要 】
Several large-scale field campaigns have been conducted over the last 20 years that require accurate measurements of soil moisture conditions. These measurements are manually conducted using soil moisture probes which require calibration. The calibration process involves the collection of hundreds of soil moisture cores, which is extremely labor intensive. In 2012, a field campaign was conducted in southern Manitoba in which 55 fields were sampled and calibration equations were derived for each field. The Soil Moisture Active Passive Experiment 2016 (SMAPVEX16) was conducted in this same region, and 21 of the same fields were resampled. This study examines the temporal transferability of calibration equations between these two field campaigns. It was found that the larger range in soil moisture over which samples were collected in 2012 (average range 0.11-0.41 m(3) m(-3)) generally resulted in lower errors when used in 2016 (average range 0.24-0.44 m(3) m(-3)) than the equations derived in 2016 when used with data collected in 2012. Combining the data collected in 2012 and 2016 did not improve the errors, overall. These results suggest that the transfer of calibration equations from one year to the next is not recommended. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
【 授权许可】
Free
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
10_1016_j_jhydrol_2017_11_023.pdf | 1651KB | download |