JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES | 卷:395 |
Towards practical sulfolane based electrolytes: Choice of Li salt for graphite electrode operation | |
Article | |
Zhang, Tong1  Porcher, Willy2  Paillard, Elie1  | |
[1] Forschungszentrum Julich, Helmholtz Inst Munster, IEK 12, Correnstr 80, D-48149 Munster, Germany | |
[2] Univ Grenoble Alpes, CEA Liten, 17 Rue Martyrs, F-38054 Grenoble, France | |
关键词: Sulfolane; Electrolyte; Lithium-ion; Graphite; LiFSI; LiTDI; LiDFOB; | |
DOI : 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.05.077 | |
来源: Elsevier | |
【 摘 要 】
Sulfolane (tetramethylene sulfone, SL) is known for leading to Li-ion electrolytes with high anodic stability. However, the operation of graphite electrodes in alternative electrolytes is usually challenging, especially when ethylene carbonate (EC) is not used as co-solvent. Thus, we study here the influence of the lithium salt on the physico-chemical and electrochemical properties of EC-free SL-based electrolytes and on the performance of graphite electrodes based on carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC). SL mixed with dimethyl carbonate (DMC) leads to electrolytes as conductive as state-of-the-art alkyl carbonate-based electrolytes with wide electrochemical stability windows. The compatibility with graphite electrodes depends on the Li salt used and, even though cycling is possible with most salts, lithium difluoro-oxalato borate (LiDFOB) is especially interesting for graphite operation. LiDFOB electrolytes are conductive at room temperature (ca. 6 mS cm(-1)) with an anodic stability slightly below 5 V vs. Li/Li+ on particulate carbon black electrodes. In addition, it allows cycling graphite electrodes with steady capacity and high coulombic efficiency without any additive. The testing of graphite electrodes in half-cells is, however, problematic with SL:DMC mixtures and, by switching the Li metal counter electrode for LiFePO4, the graphite electrode achieves better practical performance in terms of rate capability.
【 授权许可】
Free
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
10_1016_j_jpowsour_2018_05_077.pdf | 3130KB | download |