Summary of IAEA intercomparison of IBA software

NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS

卷:266

Article; Proceedings Paper

Barradas, N. P.^2,3  Arstila, K.⁴  Battistig, G.⁵  Bianconi, M.⁶  Dytlewski, N.⁷  Jeynes, C.¹  Kotai, E.⁸  Lulli, G.⁶  Mayer, M.⁹  Rauhala, E.¹⁰  Szilagyi, E.⁸  Thompson, M.¹¹ 

[1] Univ Surrey, Ion Beam Ctr, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England

[2] Inst Tecnol & Nucl, P-2686953 Sacavem, Portugal

[3] Univ Lisbon, Ctr Fis Nucl, P-1649003 Lisbon, Portugal

[4] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Inst Kern & Stralingsfys, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium

[5] MFA Res Inst Tech Phys & Mat Sci, H-1525 Budapest, Hungary

[6] CNR, IMM Sez Bologna, I-40129 Bologna, Italy

[7] IAEA, A-1400 Vienna, Austria

[8] KFKI Res Inst Particle & Nucl Phys, H-1525 Budapest, Hungary

[9] Max Planck Inst Plasma Phys, EURATOM Assoc, D-85748 Garching, Germany

[10] Univ Helsinki, Accelerator Lab, Dept Phys, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland

[11] Cornell Univ, Dept MS&E, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA

关键词: computer software;    data analysis;    simulation;    ion beam analysis;    silicon;    stopping power;    channelling;    RBS;    EBS;    ERDA;    NRA;    glancing geometry;    Monte Carlo;    NDF;    straggling;    roughness;    multiple scattering;    resonance;   

DOI  :  10.1016/j.nimb.2007.10.043

来源: Elsevier

【 摘 要 】

The International Atomic Energy Agency has sponsored a formal intercomparison exercise for the seven depth profiling ion beam analysis codes, which are: GISA, RUMP, RBX, DEPTH, DataFurnace, SIMNRA and MCERD. This intercomparison is published in Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B [N.P. Barradas, K. Arstila, G. Battistig, M. Bianconi, N. Dytlewski, C. Jeynes, E. Kotai, G. Lulli, M. Mayer, E. Rauhala, E. Szilagyi, M. Thompson, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 262 (2007) 281-303] and summarised here. The codes implement all known physical effects and they are all evaluated. We demonstrate that there is agreement between codes often better than 0.1%; and also detailed agreement with real spectra, showing in particular that the SRIM 2003 stopping powers for Si are correct to 0.6% for 1.5 MeV He. For the case of heavy ion elastic recoil detection (HI-ERD) the single scattering codes performed poorly for scattered particles, although recoiled particles were calculated correctly. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

【 授权许可】

Free