期刊论文详细信息
OCEAN ENGINEERING 卷:211
Numerical cavitation noise prediction of a benchmark research vessel propeller
Article
Sezen, Savas1  Atlar, Mehmet1  Fitzsimmons, Patrick1  Sasaki, Noriyuki1  Tani, Giorgio2  Yilmaz, Naz3  Aktas, Batuhan4 
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Genoa, Genoa, Italy
[3] Tech Univ Bursa, Bursa, Turkey
[4] Fugro Struct Monitoring, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词: CFD;    Cavitation;    FW-H;    The princess royal research vessel;    Propeller underwater radiated noise (URN);    RANS;   
DOI  :  10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107549
来源: Elsevier
PDF
【 摘 要 】

This paper presents the preliminary results of a numerical study for noise prediction of a benchmark propeller in open water/uniform flow conditions. The experimental benchmark test data for the research vessel, The Princess Royal, were used for validation purposes. The numerical analyses were implemented by using a viscous solver based on the finite volume method while the experimental data were obtained from model tests conducted at the Genova University Cavitation Tunnel. The main aim of the study is to predict propeller hydro-acoustic performance under cavitating conditions. The hydrodynamic flow field was solved using a RANS (Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes) solver. The Schnerr-Sauer cavitation model based on a reduced Rayleigh-Plesset equation together with a VOF approach was used to model sheet cavitation on the propeller blades. The computed hydrodynamic characteristics and sheet cavity patterns were shown to be in good agreement with the Genoa experimental data, thus providing a firm basis for cavitating noise predictions. The hydro-acoustic performance of the model propeller was predicted by using a hybrid method. In the noise simulations, RANS equations were equipped with a porous FW-H (Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings) formulation. The different propeller operational conditions were simulated using this hybrid method. The numerical results were also validated with the experimental data for the propeller hydro-acoustic performance. Whereas such validations showed promising results by means of overall noise spectrum with the benchmark test cases in the low-frequency range, the numerical prediction overestimated the 1st BPF values (around 20 dB) in five loading conditions. Besides, in some loading conditions, especially between 200 and 800 Hz, the difference between numerical predictions and the experiment was found around 5-10 dB.

【 授权许可】

Free   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
10_1016_j_oceaneng_2020_107549.pdf 2793KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:8次 浏览次数:1次