期刊论文详细信息
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE 卷:19
Comparison of methods to determine the assigned value in an external quality control programme for embryo evaluation
Article
Ruiz de Assin, R.1  Clavero, A.1  Gonzalvo, M. C.1  Ramirez, J. P.2,3  Zamora, S.1  Fernandez, A.1  Martinez, L.1  Castilla, J. A.1,2,3 
[1] Virgen de las Nieves Univ Hosp, Human Reprod Unit, E-18014 Granada, Spain
[2] Perm Bank CEIFER, Granada, Spain
[3] Assoc Study Reprod Biol ASEBIR, External Qual Control Programme, Human Reprod Lab, Madrid, Spain
关键词: assigned value;    embryo quality;    external quality control;    interobserver;   
DOI  :  10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.09.026
来源: Elsevier
PDF
【 摘 要 】

This Study set Out to establish adequate assigned values for a National External Quality Control Programme of embryo evaluation. The results obtained by Spanish laboratories in this programme are compared with those of a group of national experts in embryo quality. Image-based embryo evaluation consists not only of classifying embryos as being of optimal, moderate or poor quality, but also of specifying the clinical decision to be taken regarding each embryo (transfer, cryopreservation or rejection). The proportion of embryos for which there was a high degree of agreement among the experts was 98.3% for embryo classification and 93.3% for clinical decision; for the laboratories, the respective values were 44.2 and 42.5%. With respect to the interobserver agreement among laboratories and experts, kappa coefficients were lower than 0.6 both for classification and for clinical decision. The experts recommended cryopreservation of a higher percentage of embryos classified as poor quality than did the laboratories (28 versus 4%, P = 0.05). The data obtained show that the agreement among laboratories is lower than among experts, and that the concordance among experts and laboratories is moderate. Therefore, it is recommended that an assigned value from external quality control programmes is established based on the consensus values obtained from experts.

【 授权许可】

Free   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
10_1016_j_rbmo_2009_09_026.pdf 396KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:0次