Methodology matters: IVF versus ICSI and embryonic gene expression

REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE

卷:23

Article

Bridges, Phillip J.¹  Jeoung, Myoungkun¹  Kim, Heyoung¹  Kim, Jung Ho²  Lee, Dong Ryul²  Ko, CheMyong¹  Baker, Doris J.¹ 

[1] Univ Kentucky, Div Clin & Reprod Sci, Lexington, KY 40536 USA

[2] CHA Univ, Fertil Ctr, CHA Gangnam Med Ctr, Seoul 135080, South Korea

关键词: activation;    blastocyst;    gene expression;    ICSI;    IVF;    mouse;   

DOI  :  10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.04.007

来源: Elsevier

【 摘 要 】

The use of assisted reproduction treatment, especially intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), is now linked to a range of adverse consequences, the aetiology of which remains largely undefined. Our objective of this study was to determine differences in gene expression of blastocysts generated by ICSI as well as ICSI with artificial oocyte activation (ICSI-A) versus the less manipulative IVF, providing fundamental genetic information that can be used to aid in the diagnosis or treatment of those adversely affected by assisted reproduction treatment, as well as stimulate research to further refine these techniques. Murine blastocysts were generated by ICSI, ICSI-A and IVF, and processed for a microarray-based analysis of gene expression. Ten blastocysts were pooled for each procedure and three independent replicates generated. The data were then processed to determine differential gene expression and to identify biological pathways affected by the procedures. In blastocysts derived by ICSI versus IVF, the expression of 197 genes differed (P < 0.01). In blastocysts derived by ICSI-A versus IVF and ICSI-A versus ICSI, the expression of 132 and 65 genes differed respectively (P < 0.01). Procedural-induced changes in genes regulating specific biological pathways revealed some consistency to known adverse consequences. Detailed investigation of procedure-specific dysfunction is therefore warranted. (C) 2011, Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

【 授权许可】

Free