期刊论文详细信息
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE 卷:38
Association between sperm DNA fragmentation and idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Review
Tan, Justin1,2,3  Taskin, Omur1,2,3  Albert, Arianne1,2,3  Bedaiwy, Mohamed A.1,2,3 
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Childrens & Womens Hosp, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Hlth Ctr British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词: Meta-analysis;    Recurrent pregnancy loss;    Sperm DNA fragmentation;   
DOI  :  10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.029
来源: Elsevier
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Sperm DNA fragmentation (sDF) has emerged as a valuable tool for evaluating male fertility, yet the relationship between DNA fragmentation in the male gamete and idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) remains a topic of ongoing debate. Hence, a meta-analysis was conducted of 12 prospective and 2 retrospective studies involving 530 men with a history of RPL who underwent sDF testing compared with 639 fertile control participants. The main outcome measures were sDF measured by comet assay, TdT (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase)-mediated dUDP nick-end labelling (TUNEL), sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) or sperm chromatin structure assay. Overall, couples with a history of idiopathic RPL demonstrated higher levels of sDF than fertile couples (average mean difference 11.98, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated a similar average mean difference between the RPL and control groups using SCD compared with TUNEL, while mean paternal age and mean sperm motility in the RPL groups tested by meta-regression demonstrated no significant effect on the mean differences in sDF (P > 0.10). These results support the diagnostic value of sDF over standard semen analysis, as well as a possible paternally derived genetic origin of unexplained RPL. Further prospective studies are required to further assess the predictive utility of sDF for assessing couples with unexplained RPL.

【 授权许可】

Free   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
10_1016_j_rbmo_2018_12_029.pdf 1139KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:4次 浏览次数:0次