期刊论文详细信息
BMC Immunology
Validation of T-Track® CMV to assess the functionality of cytomegalovirus-reactive cell-mediated immunity in hemodialysis patients
Research Article
Bernhard K. Krämer1  Bernd Krüger1  Bernhard Banas2  Carsten A. Böger2  Gerhard Lückhoff3  Joachim Leicht4  Josef Köstler5  Ralf Wagner5  Ludwig Deml6  Sascha Barabas6  Julia Batzilla6  Anne Rascle6  Hanna Bendfeldt6  Mathias Schemmerer7 
[1] 5th Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany;Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany;Dialysis Center Landshut, Landshut, Germany;Dialysis Center Schwandorf, Schwandorf, Germany;Institute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany;Lophius Biosciences GmbH, Regensburg, Germany;Lophius Biosciences GmbH, Regensburg, Germany;Institute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany;
关键词: Cytomegalovirus;    CMV;    IE-1;    pp65;    Cell-mediated immunity;    IFN-γ ELISpot;    T-Track® CMV;    QuantiFERON®-CMV;    iTAg™ MHC Tetramers;    Hemodialysis;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12865-017-0194-z
 received in 2016-08-13, accepted in 2017-02-10,  发布年份 2017
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundUncontrolled cytomegalovirus (CMV) replication in immunocompromised solid-organ transplant recipients is a clinically relevant issue and an indication of impaired CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMI). Primary aim of this study was to assess the suitability of the immune monitoring tool T-Track® CMV to determine CMV-reactive CMI in a cohort of hemodialysis patients representative of patients eligible for renal transplantation. Positive and negative agreement of T-Track® CMV with CMV serology was examined in 124 hemodialysis patients, of whom 67 (54%) revealed a positive CMV serostatus. Secondary aim of the study was to evaluate T-Track® CMV performance against two unrelated CMV-specific CMI monitoring assays, QuantiFERON®-CMV and a cocktail of six class I iTAg™ MHC Tetramers.ResultsPositive T-Track® CMV results were obtained in 90% (60/67) of CMV-seropositive hemodialysis patients. In comparison, 73% (45/62) and 77% (40/52) positive agreement with CMV serology was achieved using QuantiFERON®-CMV and iTAg™ MHC Tetramer. Positive T-Track® CMV responses in CMV-seropositive patients were dominated by pp65-reactive cells (58/67 [87%]), while IE-1-responsive cells contributed to an improved (87% to 90%) positive agreement of T-Track® CMV with CMV serology. Interestingly, T-Track® CMV, QuantiFERON®-CMV and iTAg™ MHC Tetramers showed 79% (45/57), 87% (48/55) and 93% (42/45) negative agreement with serology, respectively, and a strong inter-assay variability. Notably, T-Track® CMV was able to detect IE-1-reactive cells in blood samples of patients with a negative CMV serology, suggesting either a previous exposure to CMV that yielded a cellular but no humoral immune response, or TCR cross-reactivity with foreign antigens, both suggesting a possible protective immunity against CMV in these patients.ConclusionT-Track® CMV is a highly sensitive assay, enabling the functional assessment of CMV-responsive cells in hemodialysis patients prior to renal transplantation. T-Track® CMV thus represents a valuable immune monitoring tool to identify candidate transplant recipients potentially at increased risk for CMV-related clinical complications.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2017

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311109393641ZK.pdf 531KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  • [65]
  • [66]
  • [67]
  • [68]
  • [69]
  • [70]
  • [71]
  • [72]
  • [73]
  • [74]
  • [75]
  • [76]
  • [77]
  • [78]
  • [79]
  • [80]
  • [81]
  • [82]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:6次 浏览次数:0次