Thresholds for clinical importance for four key domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30: physical functioning, emotional functioning, fatigue and pain

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Research

Krzysztof A. Tomaszewski¹  August Zabernigg²  Bernhard Holzner³  Wilma Kuijpers⁴  Neil K. Aaronson⁴  Johannes M. Giesinger⁴  Elizabeth Friend⁵  Teresa Young⁶ 

[1] Department of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland;Department of Internal Medicine, Kufstein County Hospital, Endach 27, A-6330, Kufstein, Austria;Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstr. 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria;Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, Amsterdam, CX, The Netherlands;Hepatobiliary Research, The Ark Centre, Basingstoke & North Hampshire Hospital, Aldermaston Road, RG24 9NA, Basingstoke, UK;Lynda Jackson Macmillan Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Rickmansworth Rd, HA62RN, Northwood, UK;

关键词: Threshold for clinical importance;    EORTC QLQ-C30;    Patient-reported outcomes;    Quality of life;    Cancer;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12955-016-0489-4

 received in 2015-11-27, accepted in 2016-05-27,  发布年份 2016

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe EORTC QLQ-C30 is one of the most widely used quality of life questionnaires in cancer research. Availability of thresholds for clinical importance for the individual questionnaire domains could help to increase its interpretability. The aim of our study was to identify thresholds for clinical importance for four EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: Physical Functioning (PF), Emotional Functioning (EF), Pain (PA) and Fatigue (FA).MethodsWe recruited adult cancer patients from Austria, the Netherlands, Poland and the UK. No restrictions were placed on diagnosis or type or stage of treatment. Patients completed the QLQ-C30 and three anchor items reflecting potential attributes of clinically important levels of PF, EF, PA and FA. We merged the anchor items assessing perceived burden, limitations in daily activities and need for help into a dichotomous external criterion to estimate thresholds for clinical importance using Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) analysis.ResultsIn our sample of 548 cancer patients (mean age 60.6 years; 54 % female), the QLQ-C30 scales showed high diagnostic accuracy in identifying patients reporting burden, limitations and/or need for help related to PF, EF, PA and FA. All areas under the curve were above 0.86.ConclusionsWe were able to estimate thresholds for clinical importance for four QLQ-C30 scales. When used in daily clinical practice, these thresholds can help to identify patients with clinically important problems requiring further exploration and possibly intervention by health care professionals.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2016