期刊论文详细信息
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Health-related quality of life and the predictive role of sense of coherence, spirituality and religious coping in a sample of Iranian women with breast cancer: a prospective study with comparative design
Research
Camelia Rohani1  Ann Langius-Eklöf2  Heidar-Ali Abedi3  Ramesh Omranipour4 
[1] Department of Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences School of Nursing and Midwifery, Valiasr st., Niayesh Crossroad, 1985717443, Tehran, Iran;Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Alle’ 23, 14183, Huddinge, Sweden;Department of Nursing, Islamic Azad University Nursing and Midwifery School, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, 8153653791, Isfahan, Iran;Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 1419733141, Tehran, Iran;
关键词: Health-related quality of life;    Breast cancer;    Sense of coherence;    Spirituality;    Religious coping;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12955-015-0229-1
 received in 2014-06-27, accepted in 2015-03-03,  发布年份 2015
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThere is disagreement among studies of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) changes in breast cancer patients over time. Reportedly, assessment of HRQoL prior to diagnosis may be crucial to provide a clear point of comparison for later measurements. The aims of this study were (1) to investigate changes in HRQoL, sense of coherence (SOC), spirituality and religious coping in a group of women with breast cancer from the pre-diagnosis phase to 6 months later in comparison with a control group, and (2) to explore the predictor role of SOC, spirituality, and religious coping within the breast cancer group at the 6-month follow-up.MethodsA sample of women with breast cancer (n = 162) and a matched control group (n = 210) responded to the following instruments on both occasions: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30, the SOC Scale, the Spiritual Perspective Scale and the Brief Religious Coping Scale. A series of General Linear Model (GLM) Repeated Measures was used to determine changes between the groups over time. Also, Multiple Linear Regression analyses were applied to each of the HRQoL dimensions, as dependent variable at the 6 months follow-up.ResultsPhysical and role function, fatigue, and financial difficulties were rated worse by the women with breast cancer during the first 6 months in comparison to the controls, which was both a statistically (p < 0.001) and clinically significant difference. Women had better scores for global quality of life (p < 0.001), and emotional functioning (p < 0.01) during the same period of time. The degree of SOC (p < 0.01) and baseline ratings of several dimensions of HRQoL (p < 0.05) were the most important predictors of HRQoL changes.ConclusionsCollecting HRQoL data before a final diagnosis of breast cancer is important to identify women at risk of deterioration in HRQoL during and after treatment. Special attention should be paid to physical and role functioning impairment, fatigue, and financial difficulties experienced by these women. These results underscore that the degree of SOC may be more important as a predictor for HRQoL changes in this sample than spirituality and religious coping.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Rohani et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311108641995ZK.pdf 499KB PDF download
Fig. 8 80KB Image download
MediaObjects/12888_2023_5278_MOESM1_ESM.docx 20KB Other download
MediaObjects/12888_2023_5278_MOESM2_ESM.docx 20KB Other download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 8

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  • [65]
  • [66]
  • [67]
  • [68]
  • [69]
  • [70]
  • [71]
  • [72]
  • [73]
  • [74]
  • [75]
  • [76]
  • [77]
  • [78]
  • [79]
  • [80]
  • [81]
  • [82]
  • [83]
  • [84]
  • [85]
  • [86]
  • [87]
  • [88]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:5次 浏览次数:1次