期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
Comparative in vitro toxicity of a graphene oxide-silver nanocomposite and the pristine counterparts toward macrophages
Research
Solange Cadore1  Catarinie Diniz Pereira1  Sílvio Roberto Consonni2  Selma Giorgio3  Oswaldo Luiz Alves4  Ana Carolina Mazarin de Moraes4  Luis Augusto Visani de Luna5 
[1] Atomic Spectrometry Group (GEAtom), Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil;Brazilian Biosciences National Laboratory (LNBio), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, Brazil;Laboratory of Cytochemistry and Immunocytochemistry (LCI), Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil;Laboratory of Leishmaniasis (Lableish), Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil;Laboratory of Solid State Chemistry (LQES), Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil;Laboratory of Solid State Chemistry (LQES), Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil;Laboratory of Leishmaniasis (Lableish), Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil;
关键词: Graphene oxide-silver nanocomposite;    Macrophage;    Internalization;    Reactive oxygen species;    Synergism;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12951-016-0165-1
 received in 2015-12-18, accepted in 2016-02-12,  发布年份 2016
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundGraphene oxide (GO) is a highly oxidized graphene form with oxygen functional groups on its surface. GO is an excellent platform to support and stabilize silver nanoparticles (AgNP), which gives rise to the graphene oxide-silver nanoparticle (GOAg) nanocomposite. Understanding how this nanocomposite interacts with cells is a toxicological challenge of great importance for future biomedical applications, and macrophage cells can provide information concerning the biocompatibility of these nanomaterials. The cytotoxicity of the GOAg nanocomposite, pristine GO, and pristine AgNP was compared toward two representative murine macrophages: a tumoral lineage (J774) and peritoneal macrophages collected from Balb/c mouse. The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by J774 macrophages was also monitored. We investigated the internalization of nanomaterials by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The quantification of internalized silver was carried out by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Nanomaterial stability in the cell media was investigated overtime by visual observation, inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP OES), and dynamic light scattering (DLS).ResultsThe GOAg nanocomposite was more toxic than pristine GO and pristine AgNP for both macrophages, and it significantly induced more ROS production compared to pristine AgNP. TEM analysis showed that GOAg was internalized by tumoral J774 macrophages. However, macrophages internalized approximately 60 % less GOAg than did pristine AgNP. The images also showed the degradation of nanocomposite inside cells.ConclusionsAlthough the GOAg nanocomposite was less internalized by the macrophage cells, it was more toxic than the pristine counterparts and induced remarkable oxidative stress. Our findings strongly reveal a synergistic toxicity effect of the GOAg nanocomposite. The toxicity and fate of nanocomposites in cells are some of the major concerns in the development of novel biocompatible materials and must be carefully evaluated.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© de Luna et al. 2016

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311107804320ZK.pdf 3735KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  • [65]
  • [66]
  • [67]
  • [68]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:2次 浏览次数:0次