期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Translational Medicine
Biomarkers of inflammation and innate immunity in atrophic nonunion fracture
Research
Pierre Leprince1  Marianne Fillet2  Myrielle Mathieu3  Valérie Gangji4  Charlotte Collin5  Dominique de Seny5  Jean-Philippe Hauzeur5  Michel G. Malaise5  Gaël Cobraiville6 
[1] GIGA-Neurosciences, University of Liège, 4000, Liège, Belgium;Laboratory for the Analysis of Medicines, Department of Pharmacy, CIRM, University of Liège, 4000, Liège, Belgium;Laboratory of Bone and Metabolic Biochemistry, Department of Rheumatology, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000, Brussels, Belgium;Laboratory of Bone and Metabolic Biochemistry, Department of Rheumatology, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000, Brussels, Belgium;Department of Rheumatology and Physical Medicine, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000, Brussels, Belgium;Laboratory of Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, GIGA Research, University of Liège, Tour GIGA, +2, CHU, 4000, Liège, Belgium;Laboratory of Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, GIGA Research, University of Liège, Tour GIGA, +2, CHU, 4000, Liège, Belgium;Laboratory for the Analysis of Medicines, Department of Pharmacy, CIRM, University of Liège, 4000, Liège, Belgium;
关键词: Proteomics;    Biomarkers;    2D-DIGE;    SELDI;    Nonunion;    Innate immunity;    Hepcidin;    Complement;    Apolipoprotein;    S100A8;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12967-016-1019-1
 received in 2016-04-26, accepted in 2016-08-22,  发布年份 2016
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundNonunion is a failure of healing following a bone fracture. Its physiopathology remains partially unclear and the discovery of new mediators could promote the understanding of bone healing.MethodsThirty-three atrophic nonunion (NU) patients that failed to demonstrate any radiographic improvement for 6 consecutive months were recruited for providing serum samples. Thirty-five healthy volunteers (HV) served as the control group. Proteomics studies were performed using SELDI-TOF–MS and 2D-DIGE approaches, associated or not with Proteominer® preprocessing, to highlight biomarkers specific to atrophic nonunion pathology. Peak intensities were analyzed by two statistical approaches, a nonparametric Mann–Whitney U tests (univariate approach) and a machine-learning algorithm called extra-trees (multivariate approach). Validation of highlighted biomarkers was performed by alternative approaches such as microfluidic LC–MS/MS, nephelometry, western blotting or ELISA assays.ResultsFrom the 35 HV and 33 NU crude serum samples and Proteominer® eluates, 136 spectra were collected by SELDI-TOF–MS using CM10 and IMAC-Cu2+ ProteinChip arrays, and 665 peaks were integrated for extra-trees multivariate analysis. Accordingly, seven biomarkers and several variants were identified as potential NU biomarkers. Their levels of expression were found to be down- or up-regulated in serum of HV vs NU. These biomarkers are inter-α-trypsin inhibitor H4, hepcidin, S100A8, S100A9, glycated hemoglobin β subunit, PACAP related peptide, complement C3 α-chain. 2D-DIGE experiment allowed to detect 14 biomarkers as being down- or up-regulated in serum of HV vs NU including a cleaved fragment of apolipoprotein A-IV, apolipoprotein E, complement C3 and C6. Several biomarkers such as hepcidin, complement C6, S100A9, apolipoprotein E, complement C3 and C4 were confirmed by an alternative approach as being up-regulated in serum of NU patients compared to HV controls.ConclusionTwo proteomics approaches were used to identify new biomarkers up- or down-regulated in the nonunion pathology, which are involved in bone turn-over, inflammation, innate immunity, glycation and lipid metabolisms. High expression of hepcidin or S100A8/S100A9 by myeloid cells and the presence of advanced glycation end products and complement factors could be the result of a longstanding inflammatory process. Blocking macrophage activation and/or TLR4 receptor could accelerate healing of fractured bone in at-risk patients.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2016

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311107647161ZK.pdf 2134KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:1次