Journal of Translational Medicine | |
Biomarkers of inflammation and innate immunity in atrophic nonunion fracture | |
Research | |
Pierre Leprince1  Marianne Fillet2  Myrielle Mathieu3  Valérie Gangji4  Charlotte Collin5  Dominique de Seny5  Jean-Philippe Hauzeur5  Michel G. Malaise5  Gaël Cobraiville6  | |
[1] GIGA-Neurosciences, University of Liège, 4000, Liège, Belgium;Laboratory for the Analysis of Medicines, Department of Pharmacy, CIRM, University of Liège, 4000, Liège, Belgium;Laboratory of Bone and Metabolic Biochemistry, Department of Rheumatology, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000, Brussels, Belgium;Laboratory of Bone and Metabolic Biochemistry, Department of Rheumatology, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000, Brussels, Belgium;Department of Rheumatology and Physical Medicine, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1000, Brussels, Belgium;Laboratory of Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, GIGA Research, University of Liège, Tour GIGA, +2, CHU, 4000, Liège, Belgium;Laboratory of Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, GIGA Research, University of Liège, Tour GIGA, +2, CHU, 4000, Liège, Belgium;Laboratory for the Analysis of Medicines, Department of Pharmacy, CIRM, University of Liège, 4000, Liège, Belgium; | |
关键词: Proteomics; Biomarkers; 2D-DIGE; SELDI; Nonunion; Innate immunity; Hepcidin; Complement; Apolipoprotein; S100A8; | |
DOI : 10.1186/s12967-016-1019-1 | |
received in 2016-04-26, accepted in 2016-08-22, 发布年份 2016 | |
来源: Springer | |
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundNonunion is a failure of healing following a bone fracture. Its physiopathology remains partially unclear and the discovery of new mediators could promote the understanding of bone healing.MethodsThirty-three atrophic nonunion (NU) patients that failed to demonstrate any radiographic improvement for 6 consecutive months were recruited for providing serum samples. Thirty-five healthy volunteers (HV) served as the control group. Proteomics studies were performed using SELDI-TOF–MS and 2D-DIGE approaches, associated or not with Proteominer® preprocessing, to highlight biomarkers specific to atrophic nonunion pathology. Peak intensities were analyzed by two statistical approaches, a nonparametric Mann–Whitney U tests (univariate approach) and a machine-learning algorithm called extra-trees (multivariate approach). Validation of highlighted biomarkers was performed by alternative approaches such as microfluidic LC–MS/MS, nephelometry, western blotting or ELISA assays.ResultsFrom the 35 HV and 33 NU crude serum samples and Proteominer® eluates, 136 spectra were collected by SELDI-TOF–MS using CM10 and IMAC-Cu2+ ProteinChip arrays, and 665 peaks were integrated for extra-trees multivariate analysis. Accordingly, seven biomarkers and several variants were identified as potential NU biomarkers. Their levels of expression were found to be down- or up-regulated in serum of HV vs NU. These biomarkers are inter-α-trypsin inhibitor H4, hepcidin, S100A8, S100A9, glycated hemoglobin β subunit, PACAP related peptide, complement C3 α-chain. 2D-DIGE experiment allowed to detect 14 biomarkers as being down- or up-regulated in serum of HV vs NU including a cleaved fragment of apolipoprotein A-IV, apolipoprotein E, complement C3 and C6. Several biomarkers such as hepcidin, complement C6, S100A9, apolipoprotein E, complement C3 and C4 were confirmed by an alternative approach as being up-regulated in serum of NU patients compared to HV controls.ConclusionTwo proteomics approaches were used to identify new biomarkers up- or down-regulated in the nonunion pathology, which are involved in bone turn-over, inflammation, innate immunity, glycation and lipid metabolisms. High expression of hepcidin or S100A8/S100A9 by myeloid cells and the presence of advanced glycation end products and complement factors could be the result of a longstanding inflammatory process. Blocking macrophage activation and/or TLR4 receptor could accelerate healing of fractured bone in at-risk patients.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
© The Author(s) 2016
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO202311107647161ZK.pdf | 2134KB | download |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]
- [2]
- [3]
- [4]
- [5]
- [6]
- [7]
- [8]
- [9]
- [10]
- [11]
- [12]
- [13]
- [14]
- [15]
- [16]
- [17]
- [18]
- [19]
- [20]
- [21]
- [22]
- [23]
- [24]
- [25]
- [26]
- [27]
- [28]
- [29]
- [30]
- [31]
- [32]
- [33]
- [34]
- [35]
- [36]
- [37]
- [38]
- [39]
- [40]
- [41]
- [42]
- [43]
- [44]
- [45]
- [46]
- [47]
- [48]
- [49]
- [50]
- [51]
- [52]
- [53]
- [54]
- [55]
- [56]
- [57]
- [58]
- [59]
- [60]
- [61]
- [62]
- [63]