Using program evaluation to support knowledge translation in an interprofessional primary care team: a case study

BMC Family Practice

Research Article

Don Klinger¹  Lyn Shulha¹  Lori Letts²  Catherine Donnelly³ 

[1] Faculty of Education, Queen’s University, Duncan McArthur Hall, 511 Union Street, K7M 5R7, Kingston, ON, Canada;School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Room 403, 1400 Main St. W., L8S 1C7, Hamilton, ON, Canada;School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen’s University, 31 George Street, K7L 4B4, Kingston, ON, Canada;

关键词: Interdisciplinary health team;    Primary health care;    Knowledge translation;    Integrated knowledge translation;    Program evaluation;    Case study;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12875-016-0538-4

 received in 2016-01-06, accepted in 2016-09-23,  发布年份 2016

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundEvaluation is a fundamental component in building quality primary care and is ideally situated to support individual, team and organizational learning by offering an accessible form of participatory inquiry. The evaluation literature has begun to recognize the unique features of KT evaluations and has described attributes to consider when evaluating KT activities. While both disciplines have focused on the evaluation of KT activities neither has explored the role of evaluation in KT. The purpose of the paper is to examine how participation in program evaluation can support KT in a primary care setting.MethodsA mixed methods case study design was used, where evaluation was conceptualized as a change process and intervention. A Memory Clinic at an interprofessional primary care clinic was the setting in which the study was conducted. An evaluation framework, Pathways of Influence provided the theoretical foundation to understand how program evaluation can facilitate the translation of knowledge at the level of the individual, inter-personal (Memory Clinic team) and the organization. Data collection included questionnaires, interviews, evaluation log and document analysis. Questionnaires and interviews were administered both before and after the evaluation: Pattern matching was used to analyze the data based on predetermined propositions.ResultsIndividuals gained program knowledge that resulted in changes to both individual and program practices. One of the key themes was the importance clinicians placed on local, program based knowledge. The evaluation had less influence on the broader health organization.ConclusionsProgram evaluation facilitated individual, team and organizational learning. The use of evaluation to support KT is ideally suited to a primary care setting by offering relevant and applicable knowledge to primary care team members while being sensitive to local context.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2016