Assessment of an integrated knowledge translation intervention to improve nutrition intakes among patients undergoing elective bowel surgery: a mixed-method process evaluation

BMC Health Services Research

Michael von Papen¹  Megan Rattray²  Shelley Roberts³  Ben Desbrow⁴  Andrea P. Marshall⁵ 

[1] Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, 1 Hospital Boulevard Southport Qld, 4215, Gold Coast, Australia;School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, 4222, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia;School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, 4222, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia;Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, 1 Hospital Boulevard Southport Qld, 4215, Gold Coast, Australia;School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, 4222, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia;School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, 4222, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia;School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, 4222, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia;Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia;Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, 1 Hospital Boulevard Southport Qld, 4215, Gold Coast, Australia;

关键词: Integrated knowledge translation;    Early oral feeding;    Knowledge translation;    Process evaluation;    Clinical nutrition;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12913-021-06493-2

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundA large evidence-practice gap exists regarding provision of nutrition to patients following surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the processes supporting the implementation of an intervention designed to improve the timing and adequacy of nutrition following bowel surgery.MethodsA mixed-method pilot study, using an integrated knowledge translation (iKT) approach, was undertaken at a tertiary teaching hospital in Australia. A tailored, multifaceted intervention including ten strategies targeted at staff or patients were co-developed with knowledge users at the hospital and implemented in practice. Process evaluation outcomes included reach, intervention delivery and staffs’ responses to the intervention. Quantitative data, including patient demographics and surgical characteristics, intervention reach, and intervention delivery were collected via chart review and direct observation. Qualitative data (responses to the intervention) were sequentially collected from staff during one-on-one, semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were summarized using median (IQR), mean (SD) or frequency(%), while qualitative data were analysed using content analysis.ResultsThe intervention reached 34 patients. Eighty-four percent of nursing staff received an awareness and education session, while 0% of medical staff received a formal orientation or awareness and education session, despite the original intention to deliver these sessions. Several strategies targeted at patients had high fidelity, including delivery of nutrition education (92%); and prescription of oral nutrition supplements (100%) and free fluids immediately post-surgery (79%). Prescription of a high energy high protein diet on postoperative day one (0%) and oral nutrition supplements on postoperative day zero (62%); and delivery of preoperative nutrition handout (74%) and meal ordering education (50%) were not as well implemented. Interview data indicated that staff regard nutrition-related messages as important, however, their acceptance, awareness and perceptions of the intervention were mixed.ConclusionsApproximately half the patient-related strategies were implemented well, which is likely attributed to the medical and nursing staff involved in intervention design championing these strategies. However, some strategies had low delivery, which was likely due to the varied awareness and acceptance of the intervention among staff on the ward. These findings suggest the importance of having buy-in from all staff when using an iKT approach to design and implement interventions.

【 授权许可】

CC BY