An assessment of the relevance of the home neighbourhood for understanding environmental influences on physical activity: how far from home do people roam?

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Research

Pippa Griew¹  Melvyn Hillsdon¹  Emma Coombes²  Andy Jones² 

[1]College of Life and Environmental Studies, Exeter University, Richards Building, St Lukes, Heavitree Road, EX1 2LU, Exeter, UK

[2]Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, NR4 7TJ, Norwich, UK

[3]UKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), Box 296, Institute of Public Health, Forvie Street, Robinson Way, CB2 0SR, Cambridge, UK

关键词: Physical activity;    Environment;    Neighbourhood;    Accelerometer;    Global Positioning Systems;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12966-015-0260-y

 received in 2014-12-11, accepted in 2015-07-27,  发布年份 2015

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe choice of geographical unit of analysis in studies of the built environment and physical activity has typically been restricted to the home neighbourhood where only a small proportion of physical activity may actually be undertaken. This study aimed to examine the distance from home at which physical activity takes place and how this varies by personal and neighbourhood characteristics.MethodsA cross-sectional, population based study of 195 people in the North West region of England, aged 18 to 91 years, clustered in 60 localities (small geographical areas of ~125 households). Individual socio-demographic data were collected by computer-aided personal interviews and physical activity was characterised by accelerometer and Global Positioning System (GPS) data. The locations of periods of light, moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity (LMVPA) undertaken outdoors were linked to measures of the neighbourhood around the home and distance from home.ResultsSixty per cent of outdoors LMVPA took place outside of the proximal home neighbourhood (800 m buffer). Distances from home where median levels of LMVPA were undertaken varied by gender (p < 0.05), home location, area deprivation, and car ownership (all p < 0.001).ConclusionsObjectively measured physical activity appears to vary appreciably by participant characteristics and home location, although for many settings a large proportion is undertaken outside of the home neighbourhood, suggesting the characterisation of neighbourhoods close to home will fail to properly capture the environmental influences on physical activity.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Hillsdon et al. 2015