期刊论文详细信息
Genetics Selection Evolution
A predictive assessment of genetic correlations between traits in chickens using markers
Research Article
Ahmad Ayatollahi Mehrgardi1  Mehdi Momen1  Masood Asadi Fozi1  Ali Esmailizadeh2  Bruno D. Valente3  Guilherme J. M. Rosa4  Daniel Gianola5  Ayoub Sheikhy6  Andreas Kranis7 
[1] Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman (SBUK), Kerman, Iran;Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman (SBUK), Kerman, Iran;State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 650223, Kunming, China;Department of Animal Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA;Department of Animal Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA;Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA;Department of Animal Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA;Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA;Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA;Department of Statistical, Faculty of Mathematic and Computer Science, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman (SBUK), Kerman, Iran;Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK;
关键词: Quantitative Trait Locus;    Genetic Correlation;    Genomic Selection;    Genomic Prediction;    Genomic Relationship;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12711-017-0290-9
 received in 2016-07-16, accepted in 2017-01-16,  发布年份 2017
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundGenomic selection has been successfully implemented in plant and animal breeding programs to shorten generation intervals and accelerate genetic progress per unit of time. In practice, genomic selection can be used to improve several correlated traits simultaneously via multiple-trait prediction, which exploits correlations between traits. However, few studies have explored multiple-trait genomic selection. Our aim was to infer genetic correlations between three traits measured in broiler chickens by exploring kinship matrices based on a linear combination of measures of pedigree and marker-based relatedness. A predictive assessment was used to gauge genetic correlations.MethodsA multivariate genomic best linear unbiased prediction model was designed to combine information from pedigree and genome-wide markers in order to assess genetic correlations between three complex traits in chickens, i.e. body weight at 35 days of age (BW), ultrasound area of breast meat (BM) and hen-house egg production (HHP). A dataset with 1351 birds that were genotyped with the 600 K Affymetrix platform was used. A kinship kernel (K) was constructed as K = λG + (1 − λ)A, where A is the numerator relationship matrix, measuring pedigree-based relatedness, and G is a genomic relationship matrix. The weight (λ) assigned to each source of information varied over the grid λ = (0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1). Maximum likelihood estimates of heritability and genetic correlations were obtained at each λ, and the “optimum” λ was determined using cross-validation.ResultsEstimates of genetic correlations were affected by the weight placed on the source of information used to build K. For example, the genetic correlation between BW–HHP and BM–HHP changed markedly when λ varied from 0 (only A used for measuring relatedness) to 1 (only genomic information used). As λ increased, predictive correlations (correlation between observed phenotypes and predicted breeding values) increased and mean-squared predictive error decreased. However, the improvement in predictive ability was not monotonic, with an optimum found at some 0 < λ < 1, i.e., when both sources of information were used together.ConclusionsOur findings indicate that multiple-trait prediction may benefit from combining pedigree and marker information. Also, it appeared that expected correlated responses to selection computed from standard theory may differ from realized responses. The predictive assessment provided a metric for performance evaluation as well as a means for expressing uncertainty of outcomes of multiple-trait selection.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2017

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311104326520ZK.pdf 1971KB PDF download
Fig. 18 701KB Image download
12951_2015_155_Article_IEq69.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 4 431KB Image download
Fig. 6 993KB Image download
Fig. 3 257KB Image download
MediaObjects/13049_2023_1131_MOESM3_ESM.mp4 884KB Other download
12951_2017_255_Article_IEq45.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 19 120KB Image download
Fig. 1 4104KB Image download
MediaObjects/41408_2023_927_MOESM4_ESM.tif 7017KB Other download
Fig. 5 4247KB Image download
Fig. 7 3820KB Image download
MediaObjects/41021_2023_284_MOESM1_ESM.pdf 242KB PDF download
Fig. 2 2313KB Image download
Fig. 10 58KB Image download
12951_2015_155_Article_IEq70.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 3 603KB Image download
Fig. 1 410KB Image download
Fig. 1 801KB Image download
MediaObjects/40798_2023_647_MOESM1_ESM.docx 181KB Other download
12947_2017_100_Article_IEq1.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 3 2370KB Image download
Fig. 3 131KB Image download
Fig. 1 103KB Image download
Fig. 4 2772KB Image download
Fig. 2 640KB Image download
Fig. 2 522KB Image download
Fig. 1 127KB Image download
Fig. 2 105KB Image download
Fig. 2 654KB Image download
Fig. 1 1293KB Image download
Fig. 3 1367KB Image download
Fig. 3 360KB Image download
12951_2015_155_Article_IEq72.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 6 1635KB Image download
12951_2015_155_Article_IEq73.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 7 38KB Image download
Fig. 6 578KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

12951_2015_155_Article_IEq73.gif

Fig. 6

12951_2015_155_Article_IEq72.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 4

Fig. 1

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

12947_2017_100_Article_IEq1.gif

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 3

12951_2015_155_Article_IEq70.gif

Fig. 10

Fig. 2

Fig. 7

Fig. 5

Fig. 1

Fig. 19

12951_2017_255_Article_IEq45.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 6

Fig. 4

12951_2015_155_Article_IEq69.gif

Fig. 18

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:5次 浏览次数:2次