期刊论文详细信息
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Using hybridization networks to retrace the evolution of Indo-European languages
Research Article
François-Joseph Lapointe1  Matthieu Willems2  Louise Laforest2  Vladimir Makarenkov2  Etienne Lord3  Anna Maria Di Sciullo4  Gilbert Labelle5 
[1] Department of Biological Sciences, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128 succ. Centre-Ville, H3C 3J7, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;Department of Computer Science, Université du Québec à Montréal, Case postale 8888, succursale Centre-ville, H3C 3P8, Montréal, Québec, Canada;Department of Computer Science, Université du Québec à Montréal, Case postale 8888, succursale Centre-ville, H3C 3P8, Montréal, Québec, Canada;Department of Biological Sciences, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128 succ. Centre-Ville, H3C 3J7, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;Department of Linguistics, Université du Québec à Montréal, Case postale 8888, succursale Centre-ville, H3C 3P8, Montréal, Québec, Canada;Department of Mathematics, Université du Québec à Montréal, Case postale 8888, succursale Centre-ville, H3C 3P8, Montréal, Québec, Canada;
关键词: Historical linguistics;    Phylogenetic trees;    Phylogenetic networks;    Reticulate evolution;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12862-016-0745-6
 received in 2016-03-30, accepted in 2016-08-17,  发布年份 2016
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundCurious parallels between the processes of species and language evolution have been observed by many researchers. Retracing the evolution of Indo-European (IE) languages remains one of the most intriguing intellectual challenges in historical linguistics. Most of the IE language studies use the traditional phylogenetic tree model to represent the evolution of natural languages, thus not taking into account reticulate evolutionary events, such as language hybridization and word borrowing which can be associated with species hybridization and horizontal gene transfer, respectively. More recently, implicit evolutionary networks, such as split graphs and minimal lateral networks, have been used to account for reticulate evolution in linguistics.ResultsStriking parallels existing between the evolution of species and natural languages allowed us to apply three computational biology methods for reconstruction of phylogenetic networks to model the evolution of IE languages. We show how the transfer of methods between the two disciplines can be achieved, making necessary methodological adaptations. Considering basic vocabulary data from the well-known Dyen’s lexical database, which contains word forms in 84 IE languages for the meanings of a 200-meaning Swadesh list, we adapt a recently developed computational biology algorithm for building explicit hybridization networks to study the evolution of IE languages and compare our findings to the results provided by the split graph and galled network methods.ConclusionWe conclude that explicit phylogenetic networks can be successfully used to identify donors and recipients of lexical material as well as the degree of influence of each donor language on the corresponding recipient languages. We show that our algorithm is well suited to detect reticulate relationships among languages, and present some historical and linguistic justification for the results obtained. Our findings could be further refined if relevant syntactic, phonological and morphological data could be analyzed along with the available lexical data.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2016

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311104177209ZK.pdf 1665KB PDF download
Fig. 3 461KB Image download
Fig. 7 4263KB Image download
MediaObjects/40560_2023_693_MOESM6_ESM.docx 52KB Other download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 7

Fig. 3

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  • [65]
  • [66]
  • [67]
  • [68]
  • [69]
  • [70]
  • [71]
  • [72]
  • [73]
  • [74]
  • [75]
  • [76]
  • [77]
  • [78]
  • [79]
  • [80]
  • [81]
  • [82]
  • [83]
  • [84]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次