Barriers to adherence with tuberculosis contact investigation in six provinces of Vietnam: a nested case–control study

BMC Infectious Diseases

Research Article

Dinh Ngoc Sy¹  Nguyen Viet Nhung¹  Warwick John Britton²  Le Phuong Loan³  Nguyen Thi Loi³  Guy Barrington Marks⁴  Gregory James Fox⁵ 

[1] National Lung Hospital, 463 Hoang Hoa Tham Street, Ba Dinh, Hanoi, Vietnam;Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, 2006, Sydney, Australia;Centenary Institute of Cancer Medicine and Cell Biology, University of Sydney, Missenden Road Camperdown, 2050, Sydney, Australia;Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, 431 Glebe Point Road, 2037, Glebe, Sydney, Australia;Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, 431 Glebe Point Road, 2037, Glebe, Sydney, Australia;South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, 2052, Sydney, Australia;Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, 431 Glebe Point Road, 2037, Glebe, Sydney, Australia;Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, 2006, Sydney, Australia;

关键词: Tuberculosis;    Contact tracing;    Screening;    Infectious Disease Contact Tracing;    Public health;    Tuberculosis;    Pulmonary;    Mycobacterium tuberculosis;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12879-015-0816-0

 received in 2014-09-26, accepted in 2015-02-10,  发布年份 2015

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundClose contacts of patients with tuberculosis (TB) have a substantial risk of developing the disease, particularly during the first year after exposure. Household contact investigation has recently been recommended as a strategy to enhance case detection in high-burden countries. However the barriers to its implementation in these settings remain poorly understood.MethodsA nested case–control study was conducted in Vietnam within the context of a large cluster randomised controlled trial of active screening for TB in household contacts of patients with pulmonary TB. The study population comprised contacts (and their index patients) from 12 Districts in six provinces throughout the country. Cases were contacts (and their index patients) that did not attend the scheduled screening appointment. Controls were those who did attend. We assessed relevant knowledge, attitudes and practices in cases and controls.ResultsThe acceptability of contact investigation was high among both cases (n = 109) and controls (n = 194). Both cases (47%) and controls (36%) commonly reported discrimination against people with TB. Cases were less likely than controls to understand that sharing sleeping quarters with a TB patient increased their risk of disease (OR 0.46, 0.27 – 0.78) or recognise TB as an infectious disease (OR 0.65, 0.39 – 1.08). A higher proportion of cases than controls held the mistaken traditional belief that a non-infectious form of TB caused the disease (OR 1.69, 1.02 – 2.78).ConclusionsThe knowledge, attitudes and practices of contacts and TB patients influence their ongoing participation in contact investigation. TB case detection policies in high-prevalence settings can be strengthened by systematically evaluating and addressing locally important barriers to attendance.Trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12610000600044.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Fox et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015