| BMC Infectious Diseases | |
| Mortality and transmissibility patterns of the 1957 influenza pandemic in Maricopa County, Arizona | |
| Research Article | |
| Cécile Viboud1  Megan Jehn2  Gerardo Chowell3  Clinton G. Nelson4  April J. Cobos5  | |
| [1] Division of International Epidemiology and Population Studies, Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA;School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA;School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA;Division of International Epidemiology and Population Studies, Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA;School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA;School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA;School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA;School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA;School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA;Barrett, the Honors College, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA; | |
| 关键词: 1957 influenza; H2N2 virus; Asian influenza; Mathematical epidemiology; Mortality rates; Transmissibility; Reproduction number; Maricopa County; Arizona; | |
| DOI : 10.1186/s12879-016-1716-7 | |
| received in 2016-03-02, accepted in 2016-07-13, 发布年份 2016 | |
| 来源: Springer | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundWhile prior studies have quantified the mortality burden of the 1957 H2N2 influenza pandemic at broad geographic regions in the United States, little is known about the pandemic impact at a local level. Here we focus on analyzing the transmissibility and mortality burden of this pandemic in Arizona, a setting where the dry climate was promoted as reducing respiratory illness transmission yet tuberculosis prevalence was high.MethodsUsing archival death certificates from 1954 to 1961, we quantified the age-specific seasonal patterns, excess-mortality rates, and transmissibility patterns of the 1957 H2N2 pandemic in Maricopa County, Arizona. By applying cyclical Serfling linear regression models to weekly mortality rates, the excess-mortality rates due to respiratory and all-causes were estimated for each age group during the pandemic period. The reproduction number was quantified from weekly data using a simple growth rate method and assumed generation intervals of 3 and 4 days. Local newspaper articles published during 1957–1958 were also examined.ResultsExcess-mortality rates varied between waves, age groups, and causes of death, but overall remained low. From October 1959-June 1960, the most severe wave of the pandemic, the absolute excess-mortality rate based on respiratory deaths per 10,000 population was 16.59 in the elderly (≥65 years). All other age groups exhibit very low excess-mortality and the typical U-shaped age-pattern was absent. However, the standardized mortality ratio was greatest (4.06) among children and young adolescents (5–14 years) from October 1957-March 1958, based on mortality rates of respiratory deaths. Transmissibility was greatest during the same 1957–1958 period, when the mean reproduction number was estimated at 1.08–1.11, assuming 3- or 4-day generation intervals with exponential or fixed distributions.ConclusionsMaricopa County exhibited very low mortality impact associated with the 1957 influenza pandemic. Understanding the relatively low excess-mortality rates and transmissibility in Maricopa County during this historic pandemic may help public health officials prepare for and mitigate future outbreaks of influenza.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
© The Author(s). 2016
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO202311103995012ZK.pdf | 3614KB |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]
- [2]
- [3]
- [4]
- [5]
- [6]
- [7]
- [8]
- [9]
- [10]
- [11]
- [12]
- [13]
- [14]
- [15]
- [16]
- [17]
- [18]
- [19]
- [20]
- [21]
- [22]
- [23]
- [24]
- [25]
- [26]
- [27]
- [28]
- [29]
- [30]
- [31]
- [32]
- [33]
- [34]
- [35]
- [36]
- [37]
- [38]
- [39]
- [40]
- [41]
- [42]
- [43]
- [44]
- [45]
- [46]
- [47]
- [48]
- [49]
- [50]
- [51]
- [52]
- [53]
PDF