Measuring group function in problem-based learning: development of a reflection tool

BMC Medical Education

Research

Matthew Sibbald¹  Athena Li²  Amy Keuhl³  Matthew Mellon⁴ 

[1] Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada;Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada;McMaster Education Research, Innovation & Theory (MERIT) Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada;Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada;

关键词: Curriculum design;    Problem-based learning;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12909-023-04726-y

 received in 2023-07-06, accepted in 2023-09-26,  发布年份 2023

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundProblem-based learning (PBL) is a pedagogy involving self-directed learning in small groups around case problems. Group function is important to PBL outcomes, but there is currently poor scaffolding around key self-reflective practices that necessarily precedes students’ and tutors’ attempts to improve group function. This study aims to create a structured, literature-based and stakeholder-informed tool to help anchor reflective practices on group function. This article reports on the development process and perceived utility of this tool.MethodsTool development unfolded in four steps: 1) a literature review was conducted to identify existent evaluation tools for group function in PBL, 2) literature findings informed the development of this new tool, 3) a group of PBL experts were consulted for engagement with and feedback of the tool, 4) four focus groups of stakeholders (medical students and tutors with lived PBL experiences) commented on the tool’s constructs, language, and perceived utility. The tool underwent two rounds of revisions, informed by the feedback from experts and stakeholders.ResultsNineteen scales relating to group function assessment were identified in the literature, lending 18 constructs that mapped into four dimensions: Learning Climate, Facilitation and Process, Engagement and Interactivity, and Evaluation and Group Improvement. Feedback from experts informed the addition of missing items. Focus group discussions allowed further fine-tuning of the organization and language of the tool. The final tool contains 17 descriptive items under the four dimensions. Users are asked to rate each dimension holistically on a 7-point Likert scale and provide open comments.Researchers, faculty, and students highlighted three functions the tool could perform: (1) create space, structure, and language for feedback processes, (2) act as a reference, resource, or memory aid, and (3) serve as a written record for longitudinal benchmarking. They commented that the tool may be particularly helpful for inexperienced and poor-functioning groups, and indicated some practical implementation considerations.ConclusionA four-dimension tool to assist group function reflection in PBL was produced. Its constructs were well supported by literature and experts. Faculty and student stakeholders acknowledged the utility of this tool in addressing an acknowledged gap in group function reflection in PBL.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1

Fig. 3

Fig. 8

Fig. 2

Fig. 4

Fig. 4

Fig. 3

Fig. 2

13690_2023_1196_Figb_HTML.png