The ‘vicious cycle’ of personalised asthma action plan implementation in primary care: a qualitative study of patients and health professionals’ views

BMC Family Practice

Research Article

Hilary Pinnock¹  Aziz Sheikh¹  Gaylor Hoskins²  Nicola Ring³  Caroline Wilson³  Hazel Booth³  Ruth Jepson⁴ 

[1] Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK;Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Profession Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK;School of Health Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK;Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, West Richmond Street, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK;

关键词: Barriers;    Implementation;    Personalised asthma action plans;    Primary care;    Qualitative;    Self-management plans;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12875-015-0352-4

 received in 2015-06-11, accepted in 2015-10-04,  发布年份 2015

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundPersonal asthma action plans (PAAPs) have been guideline recommended for years, but consistently under-issued by health professionals and under-utilised by patients. Previous studies have investigated sub-optimal PAAP implementation but more insight is needed into barriers to their use from the perspective of professionals, patients and primary care teams.MethodsA maximum variation sample of professional and patient participants were recruited from five demographically diverse general practices and another group of primary care professionals in one Scottish region. Interviews were digitally recorded and data thematically analysed using NVivo.ResultsTwenty-nine semi-structured interviews were conducted (11 adults with asthma, seven general practitioners, ten practice nurses, one hospital respiratory nurse). Three over-arching themes emerged: 1) patients generally do not value PAAPs, 2) professionals do not fully value PAAPs and, 3) multiple barriers reduce the value of PAAPs in primary care. Six patients had a PAAP but these were outdated, not reflecting their needs and not used. Patients reported not wanting or needing PAAPs, yet identified circumstances when these could be useful. Fifteen professionals had selectively issued PAAPs with eight having reviewed one. Many professionals did not value PAAPs as they did not see patients using these and lacked awareness of times when patients could have benefited from one. Multi-level compounding barriers emerged. Individual barriers included poor patient awareness and professionals not reinforcing PAAP use. Organisational barriers included professionals having difficulty accessing PAAP templates and fragmented processes including patients not being asked to bring PAAPs to their asthma appointments.ConclusionsPrimary care PAAP implementation is in a vicious cycle. Professionals infrequently review/update PAAPs with patients; patients with out-dated PAAPs do not value or use these; professionals observing patients’ lack of interest in PAAPs do not discuss these. Patients observing this do not refer to their plans and perceive them to be of little value in asthma self-management. Twenty-five years after PAAPs were first recommended, primary care practices are still not ready to support their implementation. Breaking this vicious cycle to create a healthcare context more conducive to PAAP implementation requires a whole systems approach with multi-faceted interventions addressing patient, professional and organisational barriers.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Ring et al. 2015