A case study of nurse practitioner role implementation in primary care: what happens when new roles are introduced?

BMC Nursing

Fred Burge³  Ruth Martin-Misener¹  Esther Sangster-Gormley² 

[1] Dalhousie University School of Nursing, Box 15000, 5869 University Ave.Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4R2, Canada;School of Nursing, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, British Columbia, V8W 2Y2, Canada;Dalhousie University Dalhousie Family Medicine, AJLB 8 QEII HSC, 5909 Veteran's Memorial Lane, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2E2, Canada

关键词: Primary care;    Role implementation;    Facilitators;    Barriers;    Role;    Implementation;    Nurse practitioner;   

Others  :  1092127
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6955-12-1

 received in 2012-08-01, accepted in 2013-01-18,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

At the time of this study (2009) the role of the nurse practitioner was new to the province of British Columbia. The provincial government gave the responsibility for implementing the role to health authorities. Managers of health authorities, many of whom were unfamiliar with the role, were responsible for identifying the need for the NP role, determining how the NP would function, and gaining team members’ acceptance for the new role.

Method

The purpose of the study was to explain the process of nurse practitioner role implementation as it was occurring and to identify factors that could enhance the implementation process. An explanatory, single case study with embedded units of analysis was used. The technique of explanation building was used in data analysis. Three primary health care settings in one health authority in British Columbia were purposively selected. Data sources included semi-structured interviews with participants (n=16) and key documents.

Results

The results demonstrate the complexity of implementing a new role in settings unfamiliar with it. The findings suggest that early in the implementation process and after the nurse practitioner was hired, team members needed to clarify intentions for the role and they looked to senior health authority managers for assistance. Acceptance of the nurse practitioner was facilitated by team members’ prior knowledge of either the role or the individual nurse practitioner. Community health care providers needed to be involved in the implementation process and their acceptance developed as they gained knowledge and understanding of the role.

Conclusion

The findings suggest that the interconnectedness of the concepts of intention, involvement and acceptance influences the implementation process and how the nurse practitioner is able to function in the setting. Without any one of the three concepts not only is implementation difficult, but it is also challenging for the nurse practitioner to fulfill role expectations. Implications for research, policy, practice and education are discussed.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Sangster-Gormley et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Canadian Nurses Association: Advanced nursing practice a national framework. Ottawa, ON; Author; 2008. http://www.cna-aiic.ca/CNA/documents/pdf/publications/ANP_National_Framework_e.pdf webcite
• [2]Delamaire M, Lafortune G: Nurses in advanced roles: A description and evaluation of experiences in 12 developed countries. Organization for Economic and Co-operation and Development Working Papers Number 54, Paris, France; 2010. http://www.oecd.org webcite
• [3]Donato A: Nurse practitioners in Holland: Definition, preparation, and prescriptive authority. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2009, 21(11):585-587.
• [4]Driscoll A, Worrall-Carter L, O’Reilly J, Stewart S: A historical review of the nurse practitioner role in Australia. Clin Excell Nurse Pract 2005, 9(3):141-152.
• [5]Schober M, Affara F: International Council of Nurses advanced nursing practice. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA; 2006.
• [6]Srivastava N, Tucker J, Draper E, Miller M, on behalf of the UK PICU Staffing Study: A literature review of principles, policies, and practice in extended nursing roles relating to the UK intensive care settings. J Clin Nurs 2008, 17(20):2671-2680.
• [7]Bryant-Lukosius D, DiCenso A, Browne G, Pinelli J: Advanced practice nursing roles: Development, implementation and evaluation. J Adv Nurs 2004, 48(5):519-529.
• [8]Sheer B, Wong FK: The development of advanced nursing practice globally. J Nurs Scholarsh 2008, 40(3):204-211.
• [9]International Council of Nurses-Nurse Practitioner/Advanced Nursing Network: Definition and characteristics of the role. http://icn-apnetwork.org webcite
• [10]DiCenso A, Paech G, IBM Corporation: Report on the integration of primary health care nurse practitioners into the province of Ontario. Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Toronto, ON; 2003. http://health.gov.on.ca/en/common/ministry/publications/reports/nurseprac03/np_report.pdf webcite
• [11]Goss Gilroy Inc: Report on the evaluation of implementation of the role of nurse practitioner-primary health care in Newfoundland and Labrador. Health and Community Services, St. John’s, NL; 2001.
• [12]CRNBC: Statistics. 2010. https://www.crnbc.ca/CRNBC/Statistics/Pages/Default.aspx webcite
• [13]Health Canada: About primary health care. 2006. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hcs-sss/prim/res-eng.php webcite
• [14]Health Council of Canada: Health care renewal in Canada: Accelerating change. 2005. http://healthcouncilcanada.ca/tree/2.48-Accelerating_Change_HCC_2005.pdf webcite
• [15]Hutchison B, Abelson J, Lavis J: Primary care in Canada: So much innovation, so little changes. Health Aff 2001, 20(3):116-31.
• [16]Lewis S: A thousand points of light? Moving forward in primary health care. Primary Care Framework, Winnipeg, MB; 2004.
• [17]Romanow R: Building on values: The future of health care in Canada: Final report. Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada, Saskatoon, SK; 2002.
• [18]Health Canada: Intersectoral action. Towards population health. Ottawa, ON; Author; 1999. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hppb/phdd/resource.htm webcite
• [19]Rachlis M: The federal government can and should lead the renewal of Canada’s health policy. Caledon Institute of Social Policy; 2003. http://www.michaelrachlis.con/pubs/Federal%20Role%20in%20Health%20Polich%20Feb%202003.pdf
• [20]Kaasalainen S, Martin-Misener R, Kilpatrick K, Harbman P, Bryant-Lukosius D, Donald F, et al.: A historical overview of the development of advanced practice nursing roles in Canada. Can J Nurs Leadersh 2010, 23(Special Issue):35-68.
• [21]Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada: Tri-Council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Ottawa, ON; 1998 with 2000, 2002, and 2005 amendments.http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/archives/tcps-eptc/docs/TCPS%20October%202005_E.pdf webcite
• [22]King J, Morris L, Fitz-Gibbon C: How to assess program implementation. Sage, Newbury Park, CA; 1987.
• [23]MacDonald M: Reconciling concept and context: A grounded theory study of implementing school-based health promotion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia; 1998.
• [24]Palumbo D, Oliverio A: Implementation theory and the theory-driven approach to validity. Eval Program Plann 1989, 12:337-344.
• [25]Shadish W, Cook T, Leviton L: Foundations of program evaluation. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA; 1991.
• [26]van Soeren M, Micevski V: Success indicators and barriers to acute nurse practitioner role implementation in four Ontario hospitals. Am Assoc Crit Care Nurs 2001, 12(3):424-437.
• [27]Cummings G, Fraser K, Tarlier D: Implementing advanced nurse practitioner roles in acute care: An evaluation of organizational change. J Nurs Adm 2003, 33(3):139-145.
• [28]Stolee P, Hillier L, Esbaugh J, Griffiths N, Borrie M: Examining the nurse practitioner role in long-term care. J Gerontol Nurs 2006, 32(10):28-36.
• [29]Thrasher C, Purc-Stephenson R: Integrating nurse practitioners into Canadian emergency departments: a qualitative study of barriers and recommendations. Can J Emerg Med 2007, 9(4):275-281.
• [30]Martin-Misener R, Downe-Wamboldt B, Cain E, Girouard M: Cost effectiveness and outcomes of a nurse practitioner-paramedic-family physician model of care: the Long and Brier Islands study. Prim Health Care Re Dev 2009, 10:14-25.
• [31]Van Soeren M, Hurlock-Chorostecki C, Goodwin S, Baker E: The primary healthcare nurse practitioner in Ontario: A workforce study. Nurs Leadersh 2009, 22(2):58-72.
• [32]Reay T, Patterson E, Halma L, Steed W: Introducing a nurse practitioner: experiences in a rural Alberta family practice clinic. Can J Rural Med 2006, 11(2):101-107.
• [33]Sangster-Gormley E, Martin-Misener R, Downe-Wamboldt B, DiCenso A: Factors affecting nurse practitioner role implementation in Canadian practice settings: an integrative review. J Adv Nurs 2011, 67(6):1178-1190.
• [34]Yin R: Case study research: Design and methods. 4th edition. Sage Publication, Los Angeles, CA; 2009.
• [35]Lincoln Y, Guba E: Naturalistic inquiry. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA; 1985.
• [36]Boyatzis R: Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA; 1998.
• [37]Richards L, Morse J: Readme first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods. 2nd edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA; 2007.
• [38]Richards L: Handling qualitative data a practical guide. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA; 2005.
• [39]McDonnell A, Jones M, Read S: Practical considerations in case study research: The relationship between methodology and process. J Adv Nurs 2000, 32(2):383-390.
• [40]Health Canada: Primary Health Care Transition Fund. Ottawa, ON; Author; 2007. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hcs-sss/prim/phctf-fassp/index-eng.php webcite
• [41]Helfrich C, Weiner B, McKinney M, Minasian L: Determinants of implementation effectiveness. Med Care Res Rev 2007, 64(3):279-303.
• [42]Arnstein SR: A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann 1969, 35(4):216-224. http://lithgow-schmidt.dk/sherry-arnstein/ladder-of-citizen-participation.html webcite