Subgrade soil stabilization using the Quicklime: a case study from Modjo- Hawassa highway, Central Ethiopia

International Journal of Geo-Engineering

Original Research

Hailu Regasa¹  Yonas Oyda¹  Muralitharan Jothimani¹ 

[1] Department of Geology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Arba Minch University, Po Box- 21, Arba Minch, Ethiopia;

关键词: Expansive soil stabilization;    California bearing ratio;    Maximum dry density;    Quicklime;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s40703-023-00197-8

 received in 2022-09-22, accepted in 2023-10-03,  发布年份 2023

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

This study examined the index properties, strength, and swelling pressure by mixing the Quicklime with five soil samples taken from the Meki-Abossa road section part of the Modjo- Hawassa highway. The main goal of this study was to provide more insight into the effects of Quicklime stabilization on the Atterberg limit like (LL, LP, and PI), OMC, MDD, CBR, and CBR swell percent of subgrade soil along the selected route alignment. Five disturbed samples were collected from the Meki-Abossa Road section to achieve the objectives. The samples were collected using the open pit sampling method with an average 1-1.5 m depth. Laboratory works were carried out for natural sub-grade soil and soil mixed with Quicklime. The natural sub-grade soil was classed as A-7-5 (38) by AASHTO and MH & CH by USCS, with a maximum LL of 75, PI of 41.6, MDD of 1.59, and OMC of 28, with CBR values less than five and CBR swell > 2%. The recommended lime (4%, 6%, and 8%) was mixed with the subgrade material. The result shows that the soil treated with Quicklime 4%, 6%, and 8% improved or lowered the untreated expansive soil plasticity index by 18.5%, 28.9%, and 23.8%, respectively, and increased OMC by 15.2% and reduced MDD by 18.23%. On the other hand, CBR values of the treated soil were increased by an average of 56.9%, with lower swelling potential decreases by 93.3%, higher workability, and stabilized soils were feasible to be used as subgrade material.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Korean Geotechnical Society 2023

【 图 表 】

12936_2023_4742_Article_IEq70.gif

Fig. 2

13731_2023_319_Article_IEq3.gif

12951_2015_155_Article_IEq86.gif

Fig. 2

12951_2016_171_Article_IEq1.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 5

12888_2023_5283_Article_IEq2.gif