Critical examination of knowledge to action models and implications for promoting health equity

International Journal for Equity in Health

Research

Colleen M. Davison¹  Sume Ndumbe-Eyoh²  Connie Clement² 

[1] Department Public Health Sciences, Queen’s University, 63 Fifth Field Company Lane, K7L 3N6, Kingston, ON, Canada;National Collaborating Centre for Determinants of Health, St Francis Xavier University, P.O. Box 5000, B2G 2WG, Antigonish, NS, Canada;

关键词: Health equity;    Knowledge translation;    Public health interventions;    Health inequalities;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12939-015-0178-7

 received in 2014-09-26, accepted in 2015-05-22,  发布年份 2015

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

IntroductionKnowledge and effective interventions exist to address many current global health inequities. However, there is limited awareness, uptake, and use of knowledge to inform action to improve the health of disadvantaged populations. The gap between knowledge and action to improve health equity is of concern to health researchers and practitioners. This study identifies and critically examines the usefulness of existing knowledge to action models or frameworks for promoting health equity.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review of existing literature to identify knowledge to action (KTA) models or frameworks and critiqued the models using a health equity support rubric.ResultsWe identified forty-eight knowledge to action models or frameworks. Six models scored between eight and ten of a maximum 12 points on the health equity support rubric. These high scoring models or frameworks all mentioned equity-related concepts. Attention to multisectoral approaches was the factor most often lacking in the low scoring models. The concepts of knowledge brokering, integrative processes, such as those in some indigenous health research, and Ecohealth applied to KTA all emerged as promising areas.ConclusionsExisting knowledge to action models or frameworks can help guide knowledge translation to support action on the social determinants of health and health equity. There is a need to further test existing models or frameworks. This process should be informed by participatory and integrative research. There is room to develop more robust equity supporting models.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Davison et al. 2015