期刊论文详细信息
BMC Genetics
Improving accuracy of genomic prediction by genetic architecture based priors in a Bayesian model
Methodology Article
Hao Zhang1  Jiaqi Li1  Guang Xiao1  Jinlong He1  Zanmou Chen1  Yuanyu Luo1  Ning Gao2  Zhe Zhang2 
[1] National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, 510642, Guangzhou, China;National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, 510642, Guangzhou, China;Department of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 37075, Göttingen, Germany;
关键词: Genomic selection;    Bayesian approaches;    Priors;    Genetic Architecture;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12863-015-0278-9
 received in 2015-05-23, accepted in 2015-10-08,  发布年份 2015
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundIn recent years, with the development of high-throughput sequencing technology and the commercial availability of genotyping bead chips, more attention is being directed towards the utilization of abundant genetic markers in animal and plant breeding programs, human disease risk prediction and personal medicine. Several useful approaches to accomplish genomic prediction have been developed and used widely, but still have room for improvement to gain more accuracy. In this study, an improved Bayesian approach, termed BayesBπ, which differs from the original BayesB in priors assigning, is proposed. An effective method for calculating the locus-specific π by converting p-values from association between SNPs and traits’ phenotypes is given and systemically validated using a German Holstein dairy cattle population. Furthermore, the new method is applied to a loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) dataset.ResultsCompared with the original BayesB, BayesBπ can improve the accuracy of genomic prediction up to 7.62 % for milk fat percentage, a trait which shows a large effect of quantitative trait loci (QTL). For milk yield, which is controlled by small to moderate effect genes, the accuracy of genomic prediction can be improved up to 4.94 %. For somatic cell score, of which no large effect QTL has been reported, GBLUP performs better than Bayesian methods. BayesBπ outperforms BayesCπ in 10 out of 12 scenarios in the dairy cattle population, especially in small to moderate population sizes where accuracy of BayesCπ are dramatically low. Results of the loblolly pine dataset show that BayesBπ outperforms BayesB in 14 out of 17 traits and BayesCπ in 8 out of 17 traits, respectively.ConclusionsFor traits controlled by large effect genes, BayesBπ can improve the accuracy of genomic prediction and unbiasedness of BayesB in moderate size populations. Knowledge of traits’ genetic architectures can be integrated into practices of genomic prediction by assigning locus-specific priors to markers, which will help Bayesian approaches perform better in variable selection and marker effects shrinkage.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Gao et al. 2015

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311101165252ZK.pdf 925KB PDF download
Fig. 1 151KB Image download
Fig. 7 467KB Image download
42004_2023_1020_Article_IEq12.gif 1KB Image download
12951_2017_270_Article_IEq7.gif 1KB Image download
42004_2023_1020_Article_IEq18.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 5 115KB Image download
MediaObjects/12974_2023_2896_MOESM2_ESM.tif 1653KB Other download
Fig. 2 1482KB Image download
13100_2023_302_Article_IEq7.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 1 192KB Image download
Fig. 1 50KB Image download
12951_2017_270_Article_IEq8.gif 1KB Image download
MediaObjects/13690_2023_1195_MOESM2_ESM.docx 146KB Other download
Fig. 6 196KB Image download
Fig. 5 50KB Image download
MediaObjects/12888_2023_5201_MOESM3_ESM.pdf 221KB PDF download
Fig. 1 132KB Image download
12951_2015_111_Article_IEq5.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 7 198KB Image download
Fig. 3 3571KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 3

Fig. 7

12951_2015_111_Article_IEq5.gif

Fig. 1

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

12951_2017_270_Article_IEq8.gif

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

13100_2023_302_Article_IEq7.gif

Fig. 2

Fig. 5

42004_2023_1020_Article_IEq18.gif

12951_2017_270_Article_IEq7.gif

42004_2023_1020_Article_IEq12.gif

Fig. 7

Fig. 1

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:11次 浏览次数:4次