Doing implementation research on health governance: a frontline researcher’s reflexive account of field-level challenges and their management

International Journal for Equity in Health

Research

Kerry Scott¹  Shinjini Mondal²  Surekha Garimella³  Kabir Sheikh³  Gupteswar Patel⁴  Asha George⁵ 

[1] Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 21205, Baltimore, USA;Public Health Foundation of India, 122002, Gurugram, Haryana, India;McGill University, H3A 0G4, Montreal, Canada;Public Health Foundation of India, 122002, Gurugram, Haryana, India;Public Health Foundation of India, 122002, Gurugram, Haryana, India;The University of Newcastle, 2308, Callaghan, NSW, Australia;Public Health Foundation of India, 122002, Gurugram, Haryana, India;University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X17, 7535, Bellville, South Africa;

关键词: Implementation research;    Frontline researcher;    Reflexivity;    Experiences;    Challenges;    Management;    Resilience;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12939-017-0695-7

 received in 2017-05-08, accepted in 2017-11-06,  发布年份 2017

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundImplementation Research (IR) in and around health systems comes with unique challenges for researchers including implementation, multi-layer governance, and ethical issues. Partnerships between researchers, implementers, policy makers and community members are central to IR and come with additional challenges. In this paper, we elaborate on the challenges faced by frontline field researchers, drawing from experience with an IR study on Village Health Sanitation and Nutrition Committees (VHSNCs).MethodsThe IR on VHSNC took place in one state/province in India over an 18-month research period. The IR study had twin components; intervention and in-depth research. The intervention sought to strengthen the VHSNC functioning, and concurrently the research arm sought to understand the contextual factors, pathways and mechanism affecting VHSNC functions. Frontline researchers were employed for data collection and a research assistant was living in the study sites. The frontline research assistant experienced a range of challenges, while collecting data from the study sites, which were documented as field memos and analysed using inductive content analysis approach.ResultsDue to the relational nature of IR, the challenges coalesced around two sets of relationships (a) between the community and frontline researchers and (b) between implementers and frontline researchers. In the community, the frontline researcher was viewed as the supervisor of the intervention and was perceived by the community to have power to bring about beneficial changes with public services and facilities. Implementers expected help from the frontline researcher in problem-solving in VHSNCs, and feedback on community mobilization to improve their approaches. A concerted effort was undertaken by the whole research team to clarify and dispel concerns among the community and implementers through careful and constant communication. The strategies employed were both managerial, relational and reflexive in nature.ConclusionFrontline researchers through their experiences shape the research process and its outcome and they play a central role in the research. It demonstrates that frontline researcher resilience is very crucial when conducting health policy and systems research.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2017